 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 - [+ D4 T' E2 p) b r7 ~
) G ^8 q" K% b0 I
0 |2 r. a; i3 X( }1 f! L8 f1 K$ tIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ' q0 Q: w" n% ^' N( H
, M: G: }" w* J) ?Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
5 @+ H7 a! |+ \" e( d* q% ^# D7 {: m1 o3 v( j+ y8 O+ d& w
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
) n( q. N0 y: V1 ^; n+ t R. w" G* L4 _* ^3 K
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) . i" T/ R( k6 g0 j9 L
|
|