 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 - _! _" Q* X; C# R# E2 {7 t
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
& C7 |; q1 M! D- z1 K! F0 q9 T; tOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... 6 y) u# o0 D" S4 U' j! m; V- T
: X4 A; H+ @9 N- d j4 mIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. " E% _5 T4 p' D' p! V+ J$ F- O$ d
1 s- z9 }0 W [1 D) [' V
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.033 m, a2 i/ c3 Y' K7 j8 |* u
3 I' ^, x$ d' w
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
6 R& N5 O& K; T; b! h+ A' ~ D
+ w; Y0 s' Y$ N( a+ N& t, [Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
( c0 K! q* N4 T0 c8 O& u |
|