 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
' d# i; c3 l# e3 v% {1 B/ t% H, b# T/ @/ g, y. n* @* _0 n& U
5 z$ b7 A7 F; C% i) FIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
2 l. g) k" y; x, |6 x6 n. I$ p+ C8 `: ]6 L" b8 F Q% I1 V
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.033 W& `) w# {7 u5 q
( @" d( n' S1 E2 ~% C7 }* T* M7 @4 o
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
) Q+ D' O) Q0 v
! G) o0 n) N& s9 ~: sNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) , r/ C7 E X8 U- z
|
|