埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2284|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 H5 B- N6 t8 w2 L# n0 t8 d# q
4 r) I0 ^6 r- a% e# @- q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ x6 f1 s! y! v
7 O* q. {% q$ P, k3 E0 y+ u* U5 l    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market. h1 z, j% B7 B, d1 C
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
/ v% |/ M1 C7 s9 \+ N6 ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
5 O( ]" i# E; Ain the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% y: T# o  t$ K$ L4 @price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ k4 X5 H4 n* [9 n& ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario," ^% _/ ]4 o3 t' ^6 l$ N5 W# d( l
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal6 u4 i  E7 I" S4 m& D: o
LePage Real Estate Services.
: q9 ?8 i+ Z" ^+ q% L, ^: H  h& d  i# G- L# c* b1 g3 P- q. q: r
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! y% y8 y" }4 p3 P% B$ r* `4 p3 lare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 c; E; {: Z/ F% }) ~( m' M( ]conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) Y2 N- _9 Q' Usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the: c% D( c& F5 J5 F1 T* `
residential real estate sector." @7 Q! P, y/ d: K

6 I: y7 o2 ?) Y2 w    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ {9 _5 T( D/ s9 @
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
, `+ b+ H% ~2 n/ e# ]) |9 p* Ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
& q" ~* R* d- |  n2 {(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ ^. ~2 _  s; e; F  l! _) H- t# f" ?6 P(+13.2%).- j% w0 [' f' I  |
9 {1 A0 a: D3 d7 ?/ M1 Z
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth4 G1 i9 s/ }2 ^& z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the1 O7 b  s' ~4 m* X2 ~- Y
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
8 ]1 e9 i" @; H' gpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ s/ x4 q, i. K2 i  ?, ?0 G$ V, ^# Opresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 o! H& z/ Y" m" x/ y) R' l4 ]
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We2 f4 `% m1 M. D* u% I  V7 S
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  S7 i1 s4 D$ @% E; M6 D* \balanced market."
( F. T0 X6 @' m* |4 b3 S
0 `& q$ h5 L5 _" i, P+ R- K& A    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& k  }( ^2 _( {$ J% }
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 m8 ^' Q6 i8 q
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* e' x+ g4 r% u# E# h
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 R' ~$ p  K& S5 _' Z! A8 F, m8 w
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) e! J+ [, m+ }9 R' O" D
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record8 l+ \. l# M! U2 m( g) e* {% d
breaking price appreciations.
6 V+ W9 w4 }; n& U: L" A# L+ m
$ M  J8 V( Z! ~9 E( M    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: B+ A' o& ^% r9 l$ R6 i5 }8 ~economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! l  V% j! m3 Y2 T. `$ a
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.$ ^5 S9 P, T. f

# J. t% Z3 t- K" H    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid3 K2 Y& F" R: \. f
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; v, q0 [# N& Gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off& _" J% ?: x% G# S5 N3 e1 o
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 @9 w6 D! a& l, e
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; D5 ?0 H! r% N1 P
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of/ G; h$ F0 a. v2 M
price appreciation when compared with 2005.* [% O5 l- q" _5 J0 g9 H, W% b* f

, {2 l0 h. z* r% H4 _1 }    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 w: O' q- b1 v; c% K6 X  emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% N6 h( x6 Z3 u, R( {8 g2 H5 U& j0 d
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada1 P; c6 X- {3 x1 J8 o# n* f  l
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 T1 A4 K# _3 H; V9 z) ]% [
- _, p6 ]+ o  I" _, O8 ~    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the) o- u6 `7 G5 ~7 f' h
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's# T$ D! W2 D. ^: M6 U. m- O: l' F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
; X0 j8 V8 B: o& H% [relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ q- ]. v4 k9 I8 Raffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the: I  C( X/ q8 f0 P& g0 n
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and, F5 g1 U6 J8 ]3 _
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization& b2 q: o- `& m5 U
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) b& p: x+ ~5 G* r! ?1 q2 \, }* W7 Z, v" y0 S1 P
    <<5 W( X/ ~7 a! z1 G
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ g: X* ?& \8 w- I! m' ]5 r    >>) s. I- _2 ]1 w3 l, q2 }9 M

/ e7 C, N( [% G2 C4 c3 i    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in1 D8 h4 U4 Q" `% F/ D
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
" J' _5 Y; Q6 ]of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) E- ?, U+ L. Olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 g8 M0 X6 I4 g% K& u4 g& f5 frenovations.
3 _' m7 X# _. D+ ]+ |' {9 D3 N8 p/ a# S( X) R) F2 x( s7 z
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 l9 W9 L; h' J( r9 \9 vincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 Q# t0 D; x/ \6 g5 A( |compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* @' ]+ w* i- B5 u9 x4 {6 W4 e* y
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# O6 C. m$ \' b1 w# z/ u
% d' W& d' o4 M
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
4 p, {$ J9 ]' i( C4 Oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. ^, `* }$ p- h4 w/ ]quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 F( z/ |# @. _0 U5 R3 ]9 l
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
' L. i6 x/ e! P9 H8 g2 W0 C9 gto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes2 i7 m& w& V( O) X5 {7 n+ J7 V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 @/ l% c  N) G5 M6 ~2 Y+ p+ ^& [1 t$ `9 B4 S' r' @! v8 }
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ O! C) l! @- }2 M
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. [( J$ }2 m0 S: J$ e9 g9 d( [5 u
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 X$ l: M; e, C6 J% iwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. u, y& [0 F; I; Y+ j. x
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ ~9 G$ [/ y8 G5 g3 g5 Ybuyers with more options when looking for a home.
4 t: o* q& q2 H, e" Y9 R9 A% G* N/ J' K
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly  v& T5 _" E2 @( D1 W
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes3 R& ^8 D2 E7 H3 V- `$ z& R* r
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 n2 q; ~/ t- ]* q$ y% Zas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 u5 t% ?# Q. g" F/ `2 B
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( K" h( k" D+ G2 |/ d, b0 S6 G! a: O; m$ Q0 `  i
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& _/ q. q' z; G2 Kprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
5 x* w: ?$ r) ?4 Ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- ~. U6 J. T6 V# z8 H
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' E/ _: b3 ?5 Xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
. q9 z; z9 H% ~3 u5 z. Q7 M  x7 mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before  d) Z" @; Z5 ^8 ]% ]9 h
making a purchase.
+ c1 ?- G: @5 y$ c7 d( }* q3 |: f, f1 S; n: K8 ]% W: Y, c
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ U, _7 y2 f; q, w  y. D
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" [: D  [7 U1 x) l- g* mconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city6 D; X- O" n. c$ O7 b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
6 m+ {/ q. Y" u9 Oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
" t4 n9 o' V, a0 a9 Mamenities.
$ `2 J8 u6 }! ^1 }( H8 w
& D; N6 w/ v* f; u* u    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
' J/ Z+ t3 b4 `5 k, W/ Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
2 |8 I0 p3 U3 J1 q( B: macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
1 S% R" y% Z9 i) ocontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. R! N6 C8 c( o8 \1 K4 i/ I, l7 e$ Odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle! T, N  d8 |9 ^4 O0 ?( Q8 x
residence, rather than for investment.6 ]. v" j1 g# n! l; |

: m% H1 K( {. M    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 O6 p% z2 o1 e$ l8 j; i* Y+ lhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted8 w. }5 ~6 e/ Y+ {' {
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
# Q& X4 t! H+ x6 Q. b, Bconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
' F% O6 L1 C: Frate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' f5 N; B7 `7 o6 y- E0 othe market.# l" m1 T4 m, t) P- h9 g

) Q: i" I: A8 n; \    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, A1 J! R1 z2 A2 i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& Z' x1 ^, S9 MAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 ?  \2 Q7 \" H5 y# u" Qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due& l( N! ^/ m1 N8 Y/ N$ p
to the shortage of available inventory.
/ N3 s# Q" F. g9 w5 R1 ?8 _& y; U. L1 @
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 X: z  l1 N: h  Q$ e1 p1 wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
, b' a: s9 c; \9 n2 I3 K7 Pvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! q' Q6 V# A; x  B
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 E( u; C# ]$ ^7 K- s
7 y8 G2 m3 k7 S
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& s8 Q2 I( U) }- ^in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low; E" ^. c% Q! T
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
6 D3 q' O$ C; w7 Epressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring  N7 r5 k8 Y; n3 M1 j& E0 C' l7 n
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( D4 A( a, w! K. w  u) [, Bseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
/ \  O' U# T' W3 b: L5 b9 E; |! abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

! r  d+ K% \2 W# i& Z* U2 I
0 u7 k$ {/ Q3 z7 f  G  d9 g' E    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 B( H. w) S7 I: s5 S
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 `6 l% B- }  `) Uremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
. L9 |5 Y0 ]# _+ imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( t; {) `: j2 G$ B7 |) I
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ s4 y% }  P8 N" i5 n/ q6 sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 g) N. ?  Q" Y$ _6 i6 ^/ s' J
towards the end of 2006.
   
) A) b4 B( f6 S
- }  j+ Y2 {5 q$ f, r8 QWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( J/ R/ I! A8 g0 R* l
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable% l) j: Y# o, E: Y0 c
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
) r2 C2 N" T# `/ W2 \. e+ Egroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 ~% H! d9 l; G$ c1 z/ i1 ?$ o# nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. y* ]' N5 {8 Q% K- _pressure on tight inventory levels.7 r+ P3 r/ H* x+ \3 x0 T& e6 `
7 B! Q& t, H5 b
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 A' F  F/ Q1 a3 M: jfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people( X0 O1 q# b7 }: n5 X' `1 O' e
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;2 x( _. R0 |0 t
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ [. b) i" Q! N* C
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: u/ f+ b# [# O- |
9 `- Z* a: }1 V  e/ f* l( Z    <<1 W- v5 ]+ S( @0 ]6 C+ L5 ^, R
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006$ K6 W" K0 L; @, k

' Y+ O6 M4 H- M/ I4 x9 J& s" n  c- L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) b$ q( d! q1 X- Z
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
( L1 N, g' Y* G: G  n7 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 G" C! @% J+ V8 Y& i                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! R' \: i/ i; x( u; y% F# W! [    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
7 j6 Z/ w; y! f3 Q$ U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. y/ C; m1 S: v: h    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000! Q: p8 q9 [7 u+ w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 V- E& s  r$ k! @% E6 t8 i    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
9 X+ A+ I, _6 s7 H; G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% m3 C: l. a' V0 j    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000# \# Q' t; {" f) D* Y9 t$ D: ]0 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 f# r. Z! _2 z0 f4 ?" B
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -4 C6 e  B% ]# ~, D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 q& g$ N7 F1 y: h7 ~
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3334 ]$ ]. T4 H. P' d7 N4 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! N- [4 U! {$ h8 S. J2 N( F
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583& P' E8 t5 O2 V: J  s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) b% Q" Y; p# k! l6 x. j    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
' c: p" S% K( ?) A" b0 B: l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 c3 H5 G) C7 p+ b, L8 ~* R2 |    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250, x/ v0 M$ q3 q! R: T, r2 o' K7 W* P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q' W8 O: l% k) t$ V4 ?
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
4 i, Y% x2 I; S1 X0 y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 R( I7 H" O8 p  a    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707+ g6 p, h7 [9 A4 S4 |, A& C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  r+ I) z5 @- \0 ~" `, [( T
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5007 ?6 `2 ~. N/ `0 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! }+ C7 P+ s: B( b4 r  ]9 \+ N
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389, a. _( Z2 i* a$ K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C  m, O. N. |/ g+ V- }, ~9 F
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
5 k4 I  s9 V7 ~  G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 M: ?7 M$ ~* ], m5 x9 I
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( r/ j3 \9 O) n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; {; i( G8 U/ d* G  F! i    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
# N' X; k' }3 a5 C- v6 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L" t. ~2 M& T5 }4 \9 e
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8607 W; ~: k! C$ V6 Y/ N- P  h- M- x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" b: b0 v. n" j% B' B; ?/ z0 w) ~, L) r* r1 N9 @8 c1 O0 }' Q& p; N. ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& O6 T7 N% e5 `. B                               Standard Condominium2 L2 H6 p# V( ?9 }- ^' ~; H% P* F7 U0 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% z0 d- z( Y; M: _. j  Q                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
2 {+ b! d7 b( G) B. ]    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
( K& m2 g* Y0 `  s    -------------------------------------------------------------/ i: l" p8 _) L# @; m7 u
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" c: p) d- k. t: O8 H% S& d
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ a0 W0 `# q: w
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%+ l7 [* B/ g* J8 S, v
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 v) ]. S6 g3 _
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A: Q- a0 v6 r  r9 b+ p' z6 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% m, ^$ ^. b8 l& L6 }    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
2 j! P3 K2 O& r) h    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 c, o7 x: I. M6 ~! H    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%4 u1 S5 s' |9 X8 s7 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------! x+ H4 B% ]/ I7 M: `! N
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%# h5 C+ q, l) L2 i2 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ s8 U9 j  e4 J2 Y4 f) m' a
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
& M; j1 O" G! D# o# Z. B    -------------------------------------------------------------" ]% z3 s2 k4 K# j0 }, l2 m
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
5 g, F6 n" s- i8 l3 x/ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
; r' q; A% {9 u! }+ m& q' P    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%2 N( b- Z' g& j2 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& x9 V. r7 ?, P) Z6 W/ S, c* e    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%+ A+ `  _; z+ ]! f# Q6 l! p
    -------------------------------------------------------------. k5 x* A2 y& S4 b4 a
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%( ^/ N# ~# T1 U& W8 t! E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 c2 B2 M7 I+ [3 ^    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%, o  `9 S; F# F' [' L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" ^# _/ s" z1 Y; ?    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
- d. n- A0 M$ T+ I# O) o  n    -------------------------------------------------------------
% A2 @9 z6 u$ N& ~/ N1 J; f: d    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
! R8 L" }& u0 B. ^' X1 D% r    -------------------------------------------------------------* j! s2 Z4 }+ z+ \$ j
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
* A- i. D2 {  t! G" ?    -------------------------------------------------------------; k, c8 w+ F- L* b" x* C5 l
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
7 H7 t3 _- J( m: [& `# w    -------------------------------------------------------------
) G  n2 ]( `1 ?( Z6 K4 L    >>
6 B, l% P" c" ]& {
6 ^6 E4 @* G. d0 g, |    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 V+ V  L. S2 K7 }" Uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 S6 b& o# N' F( F7 A; o0 U: {0 h
John and Victoria.; O" j% I3 i* h% `4 t" B; y
0 `3 |5 S# L6 x1 L0 _- r) Q
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
/ J9 Y3 r7 ]8 {' c. |9 E9 Ecomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of) x/ a+ i: L- x, s9 w
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release2 r; N, C# y% I! {  H8 w( c) V+ f
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
! |$ u+ j* ~# `$ x$ gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! T( N* ]/ X# }: f' P/ n
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is2 W( Q2 W8 s" I$ w$ o# b6 p  b. @
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current4 j# m" I0 ~3 Q& h4 y$ k, L
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 [7 H0 Z4 I; [' p' jversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
" Z8 E% J: I/ _4 ONovember 15, 2006.& Q1 o7 A( P3 L' }( B8 S  z
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
  Y' u* D5 k% z9 x' [# q3 ~fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge/ Z3 k! m& t- x/ r1 h
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
9 G) ~" H- u  o' Aavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-26 22:18 , Processed in 0.188903 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表