 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
2 a4 l" E) h5 q6 R1 E+ N6 P: S& k6 E& B s, N1 c) u# D; R
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 [( t0 d* k/ a% W
0 w! |1 A# U! v+ R' }
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( K0 B4 u2 c! d k/ ^0 _6 lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third: f# X. f' J4 H
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
+ v5 _: [+ t8 i* B# l: cin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% |; H, _2 F2 V$ fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
' D& a* T, o5 D, y* Z# |' {more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,1 w6 U* L# X9 l# P8 B+ ^
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal6 o3 G4 [3 h( H9 j
LePage Real Estate Services.- U) Z5 d* c& U+ d+ z# Q. W
8 s2 l, a2 }) u! g$ T) X8 k" W- B- e6 L Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 z% Q* _5 I0 v0 Vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic# n) F/ B& x2 T9 b- A
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and% x/ O0 A! q: s; p% | ]2 P0 Z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
( d6 L: p/ A7 Q3 H4 n4 Rresidential real estate sector.# A2 D6 G# u0 O) u5 V+ D/ J4 [
4 U8 f3 [/ `9 I$ L
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ T' j5 ?$ u" Q, M I4 ~' @, v
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
/ C) d, [5 X; `6 n8 b7 d$ v% C7 ~' J2 Jyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ T) _* e% G. Q: v+ S* e6 W" U4 z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. ~2 `) N$ F$ F Q" z5 ^# q* [
(+13.2%). x" {) k1 k' r B2 p; M& q g8 N
" d# }9 {* o- C8 i5 j% ?$ |; z F% l/ F "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ z+ P: w2 g* [7 {. S2 l
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& I8 o1 a9 T$ E7 }# W* @3 xfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are4 h7 I6 a2 J" S# K
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ d1 G) L* k* qpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 J: P/ ^( Q# H% W& ^! @) D"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% h4 ^ U# E0 A9 o2 N
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
# m5 S, B C% v/ ]balanced market."" r; q' z* d, A, U
, {1 j' R: f* f8 l4 | Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 u- f9 q) H# y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
! T2 N1 [1 w/ d* n8 m5 oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 a, a8 c8 N" W9 Q9 f j1 X6 p6 X
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, O: b2 e: W) r1 \% ~( O4 W. aenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! ^* r2 g$ J7 H6 W& k% E
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: N1 s! m- O9 ]
breaking price appreciations.( `: `! L; k% I. p& O. `
% @! i" ^3 N9 @; H* X4 ` Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
' \9 g8 G! g+ \0 Q, ^1 g, {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 b" ^( \7 o$ A) g8 G
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; R# c0 Q' `/ T& I% ^
3 x' C1 f( k+ F- w) t4 k! ?
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' ?7 ~' ]$ x8 p2 X* U
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: `; v% T2 L( j# W' v, @* |
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 E" r9 ?" _" F" ^+ oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
4 K) ]) r% h7 ]In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" U- O! I* Y. [, l9 X+ r
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' ]8 U4 A' t, Zprice appreciation when compared with 2005.8 A8 |: o6 g1 {% ^+ {5 Z: }7 u: ~$ z
) L1 ]) q0 t; A( s( b5 Q9 x While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( A0 S% i, y0 l: Nmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: E- z3 Z# [& L, ?
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: k# s1 T7 F3 ?) ? q4 J! I+ a6 lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 ?/ u+ _& {8 t" |6 Y
, I+ n+ I/ X7 Y/ T! L: W0 i Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the0 g$ n. v% h. `& g
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& h0 a& e, N* g) i" E1 y3 p
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
1 {+ N- I2 O/ @3 Irelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
( r- ^. \0 G3 C- k: m- s& yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the# ~0 `$ O" w% o3 x
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
' n$ `8 u$ } P, M) \; @6 B7 Yaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization/ C- \: @: u5 t+ i6 h- K3 w( s7 B& x6 k
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 n7 ?2 v3 k! _* D- M
5 T3 r' l a: J9 U& Q2 V/ u
<<
4 Y6 g! R5 M0 l/ Z: C REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; Z' o' h. f8 M9 m: n& ^, N8 { >>
" Y6 v3 u3 ?/ U1 _- R+ Y; U* O8 X! _7 i, ?
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, q! \* Y: }2 u+ S% g) tHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' t6 g* W& Z2 s/ f. ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
+ A% x& w0 h) tlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 }( m8 F2 `; \0 Y+ N7 Qrenovations.
! j/ g4 K0 M4 H( [9 Y! X
) Y* @7 L a# S0 Z9 F The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 V6 N4 z8 i) F; b1 V2 S& z9 F+ {/ G* p
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" R; l; ^& I. b+ A# R& k/ ~9 y
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) H/ o7 w. v z$ Y7 r8 f4 gSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. H- F7 |, e3 [2 A/ m
1 I6 D4 E4 F3 M5 m The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* Y5 c( o0 {" u% @
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the! d! q' X9 [4 _. ]1 a+ w
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
Q' I/ j9 E. E4 N/ d6 g3 [6 Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 L( |! _9 \/ Q7 V$ ?: mto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
) i! r5 Z$ S. p i6 Gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' U; j' ^. }4 M) z
& J' x# S \. @
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced0 I/ [# o/ [7 p9 G1 n
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 m' Z( G' J F8 ?0 I v$ Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ E1 ^; s' u' W% T/ [" ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ ?) {8 R$ @7 g, udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing7 ~0 c& ~( h. j- ]! ]2 |# ^
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
, [+ e' y/ Q$ A7 V* |! R9 L
. f. w0 Y8 `/ z7 ^8 A D Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 D/ e$ x- ^( O* k
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 e( W% P# c3 x8 Z9 l" u `! [3 _priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! |% y- r( \1 x7 has some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
' ~# a, [1 c' \( o! b/ ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! S7 C* W- F7 K( E+ U& c- ~% w
4 p4 ^* y7 C2 D: K1 ] Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. |# W4 s ] S4 H& ~7 d
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! i& v( R$ i' P) a0 [7 r* j; v# \
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 w, Z9 h! C# m. F0 efirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,% l: j+ O# P$ @* d
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 G6 n* Z8 \. \3 }3 @" y
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
2 d1 L2 |9 `( p2 l; ~4 o2 {making a purchase.7 H- p* J* g5 l. M: s: R
. F. \) r! T& E6 ]$ l6 }6 R Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing- U# e5 `3 `- Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
3 D6 K+ I( o8 p5 B4 v7 Wconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, o2 {+ {* ]0 ]
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
- q0 B3 Y3 `( Y v x1 |attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown8 ?; t) V3 k. v* B
amenities.) k6 o2 [7 {( S
4 s. @4 o2 e, e6 w5 [) N6 E The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
$ u' H0 i* K {/ ithroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
+ m |" c7 T4 {: S' }across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
+ m- @; C% J/ e( t. P/ P' @continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: b Y2 t2 }$ }. @, M, \
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 s. ]! h- A! `, Lresidence, rather than for investment.
7 E2 t: {4 R; n" M0 Q2 P/ P, C( H+ t/ c' k
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 {" q# q' p7 J0 k# ?2 u
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
2 z5 ~8 i7 k, k3 `" n' T5 N, _in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer, k/ M/ `# c) B
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
J7 Z+ s8 d/ s- g& E$ f; x! J( v; srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# ?- n: n; q3 A
the market.
1 S5 A, z, l8 x( B# C& e4 [+ r; g9 n+ w
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through4 @9 c2 Q& u6 Q* ^) y n) o
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In! T9 b$ |" V3 }0 ~5 ]8 ?3 l
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring4 Y! g9 N( l2 G( M; r8 I
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" ~3 x0 x" H4 G1 V; x& Wto the shortage of available inventory.$ X3 X2 B: P2 b6 V
9 u: D& Z4 m6 S( x7 k( i! @, r7 u
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its# Q& l0 g% f7 G! I* H5 Q
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 c5 C3 i; f7 {; ~7 ]% M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- o" p6 F8 W( ^' e. l# Mstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 X% |0 ~# f& X1 [4 J; W/ V
5 \( b% c6 t$ b& J, x$ ^ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* {( d& J7 f# N4 gin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low, J, S- w) M4 [
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% i9 p8 H% W9 |) E) U- L# D* M2 K) [
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 J+ A5 `+ D: i6 N" r* N& ?- V
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
0 v3 }+ s# ^4 I; X- |season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 j: H! @. l4 }( o
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.3 C1 s6 x {# u
/ e( w( L- b+ E& _0 H( c" c Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 @/ D6 p, C: B% @' Y3 @$ V0 Ias activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! t3 o% E/ Q [7 v6 C1 ~2 Premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 G1 P* i6 b! M v. Y& ]: }, B w! ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- c" c4 ^. p* M- V; L
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
0 ]- q/ N8 A/ M6 jin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly6 v- a P* k9 x* J( H5 R+ }1 H2 x+ @+ K
towards the end of 2006. ) ^# K4 M6 Q6 |3 B% I! B- _
( g& s% Z- x1 d& Q5 G6 n) f
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) t1 t& }3 l; e! x
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 r8 L. t* ^7 h6 ^4 D4 @( ?6 Ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 r r8 m+ H* D7 {+ xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
4 h/ V) N$ S3 L8 v4 f2 @foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 J! q Z3 E( z% n7 V
pressure on tight inventory levels.* ?! k0 u" `' N+ D. M
- i( s. t3 @0 n+ [' g) l3 c
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
: ]7 `$ x% l+ ?fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
+ k; {/ c$ p1 T. `" }3 i6 |into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 f+ h5 i4 O0 Y- ~4 ] swhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& `- u* ^8 x0 ?$ @( n3 }, Nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 E# P! v$ v/ O3 `: u" @6 L; I: Q( k3 ]$ A1 K
<<
, V/ q; I! d7 N$ X2 l2 k0 @1 L Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 o2 v. n1 z* ]% X$ s/ p6 q; P3 w8 J, ]. `4 H$ m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 t3 Z, t# v2 \. s* o# ?, Z4 R$ D5 M Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey2 n4 \) |& X+ l* H+ p" K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 f6 M; m* ?+ X2 l$ P) m" z 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3' Q: S5 B% C: S) G2 z
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
* u7 |7 F; y$ o' s: P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; o4 r0 q* w j4 P Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000; D5 m4 G1 V+ v1 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 J \7 b! B% {) q0 R5 c
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000; j, ~- S$ H w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 q1 k1 ?3 i1 ~ e1 M Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% p5 P/ t) z1 [4 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% s6 E' a# W, \- B5 q
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
9 b4 w! b* A% Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------; \/ f5 [2 }+ u4 D* _- A
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333( E: L5 L* h$ R; g) `6 A5 G( R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# W* ~+ h" [6 z: H6 L: c4 T
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
6 e, y2 y4 U: C# L7 c' ^' F+ l) B& N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( b7 V/ _3 T5 W5 m* Q0 o6 X$ n5 p Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185- O- s7 c4 n E+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 x( r: n+ W. n6 G1 u- \" S6 Q G
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2501 Y$ O2 R# ]8 i( n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" B* C i# [& _% Q Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
2 Q) Y& X" R) S4 O3 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------! B! u, D& f- u5 c( F
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
, b1 H/ P M+ u8 ]0 x. r -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 F1 z7 L6 i6 j
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500 [: C' }+ q% {# F2 n' ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 p3 J0 I/ l& B; L, v5 \# V" v
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389- b- ^4 U# \2 R# ?# p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! }1 h1 @" o" h5 G8 L3 e4 N
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714: {1 [, m3 P/ j2 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ _, J, E# s$ O' Y9 s- _/ b) [ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500, t# g/ r" r; G$ d5 C4 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! `0 l; p% J( C2 P5 G& H
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000) h" U6 n _6 R# B% h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 P+ m; R# B# l8 f4 v! s National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
# B/ q& n. z( J7 Q. M9 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------& ?3 m# c3 x9 H' a
! A2 H \/ v R7 L4 @0 `1 {+ F -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Q+ E8 _0 N$ O- F; G% s Standard Condominium2 }8 {. x# g. C; a$ J/ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ t- R( Z" _) i( E! \ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo3 T$ {; P5 X6 j
Market % Change Average Average % Change0 [' S4 X8 p6 E0 @ D) Y) |, F
-------------------------------------------------------------) S# T" L" ^3 o* e
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
% L" K6 F) b/ \, `/ ^9 b/ r -------------------------------------------------------------
- f) _& _, k3 z2 c Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
+ r% C# J! t! v2 V; a -------------------------------------------------------------
) A Y' n. V9 c1 r7 L Moncton 4.9% - - N/A" v" q$ z- O5 B6 Q D& [- s) ^
-------------------------------------------------------------. U5 T* C) o3 m5 X7 D8 ?
Saint John N/A - - N/A, ~( ]' ~1 ~+ P
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 H/ Z! Y# r4 V+ L St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
b5 `5 T# E6 L -------------------------------------------------------------4 c( W; w n" ]. o5 k7 X
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
1 A0 R! E/ `$ X1 D* ~. @* G k -------------------------------------------------------------
) Y5 S, G. g$ f) | Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
9 L8 N3 M. E5 i7 g -------------------------------------------------------------
: X$ {* ^1 i# ?! X% T( Q5 d1 i7 L Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
# a, ]4 U- M4 F7 w -------------------------------------------------------------. a7 Z, `1 ~8 L9 i6 O2 p# R9 ^
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
5 s( j: t. E2 @4 W -------------------------------------------------------------2 H' ^2 W/ ?- n/ @( n/ _
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
! n2 H) V) s y* c5 Y' L. F -------------------------------------------------------------
2 z$ _) i+ s! |+ |3 n* ~2 G5 P# U Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%( v/ A. V H2 N1 k+ ^# J# t
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 s# n" q$ U5 I3 N. B Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
# O0 _+ g* C* ]9 W% n# m3 B u: M -------------------------------------------------------------
: b/ M8 q2 K$ z2 V! ? Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
/ N( N |5 m4 f* f -------------------------------------------------------------
) S5 B/ K$ e4 l/ h! C0 S/ q Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# L9 X1 e$ A5 c# N -------------------------------------------------------------- B. l' T: p5 u1 m
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
) C- x, s; ?% E/ g' ?8 [% g -------------------------------------------------------------
' G$ l$ a$ \9 V National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
0 k4 u$ M& o u" j, n9 o -------------------------------------------------------------
8 a- v$ E: C, Y >>- m K! d2 z+ j0 G+ b& i/ g# H3 ]
; W1 m! U- J/ A* | Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
0 R! T6 F* s- ?& I' i9 D- B" A4 }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint3 \" ?) D6 \; E& B3 P+ f4 a5 e& k. R2 D
John and Victoria.
, R$ a" B- U! M0 _0 Q
6 W4 c! S$ k* V+ \9 j The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ F4 D! v: O' g: y1 f
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
! k; x d: H8 u6 t# \2 ] u5 Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 t% U i3 Z, g0 Areferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 A: C8 N( |, @ O2 o: [8 ktrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities* |" Q% C# E6 ?: q+ J& j7 I
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is3 C3 f t: p: u2 `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. c& w, V+ \$ g! efigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
, {1 D$ G. Y; H& @! `6 P: ~/ l! @+ vversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 G+ c# ?2 k2 SNovember 15, 2006.
( h. ~/ Z# z1 j2 g Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, L3 t: i8 P; J. A* Y( E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge1 y: ^, a. J) |5 Y/ O2 Y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" e8 K1 D, s' {, g3 ?8 savailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|