埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2746|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ r" f! k+ U; E/ s9 x# k4 D0 L: T& G: E1 I: w: i: v
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -2 p- F$ F" G+ ~" L4 s
7 Y. N' `& ?+ ^* I3 G, P' g6 J  K
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
$ o3 o7 c. d! @. l- o6 {/ lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third4 T' s$ r8 T% K, j& N; w
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic8 C- z$ N! d4 W1 N" C6 c+ {0 |
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, ]  }$ G! s, Z* U  h
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
3 F) z  V8 [9 l+ Y/ ]" Emore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ q. e' d8 [+ t) b
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
2 i9 Z( t' n( r0 R& M6 ALePage Real Estate Services., q% A, `& ^0 J' V  |
# Y8 H/ A! U2 H% O! v+ t; H
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters7 J4 l2 ?: W7 E( v: H0 k/ Y1 G) f
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 [+ q2 }5 {' u# [7 u7 X8 M
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and. j5 W6 Q9 k. D# R
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# Z2 Q5 i3 S' w, W& b) O7 P& j( ]residential real estate sector.
3 M; o: d+ |4 W: ^+ B% d% J' w
$ M1 w) T6 c  I0 W" E+ c3 V    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation1 L8 u1 J% z7 D
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" f$ h& A. t4 C6 O2 \. X8 _. @: ]6 d
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
# `" g2 h  m0 |# ]$ D(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
' ^) f# U$ m, z! `7 y3 P% r5 u(+13.2%).: ~8 l. E/ D5 \) D* ]: r2 V* P( J

4 V8 g( q' G7 L" {; c% _6 p    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; [* W3 s+ F& V7 }5 qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
% }" t6 C4 d: p! hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
, d" g& p4 i' ?" ]& D7 T8 apoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! A* h# Z% L# Y8 `
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
2 Y+ I) j+ X  b3 F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We  m" @6 T3 v1 F% f% D# w/ Z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ \$ a, W( a  `" k
balanced market."- c+ R/ v& O3 N
5 j& o6 W7 P1 M. I, k6 A
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,. m& \, T  j! A9 V3 J5 {2 P
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
2 g% A" [2 [7 v1 Q% fto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
  j8 @$ k4 ?3 F8 H+ z: t- K5 R# Kthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
/ v$ G3 ~% W( Z& y3 fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
# H* U" @0 ?1 W  b7 Dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ R) W6 L8 B" J' `breaking price appreciations.
9 o+ ?4 ?$ S% M. X7 \. S& P9 T+ D  `0 w+ f/ c& S" `
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- D3 l, p$ L- F) k) G, j9 _5 |
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
/ O8 `. |+ O" Dlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
  @1 J7 V+ t( B* c6 G. \. v' y3 e2 v2 ^, _
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid  `$ _8 c8 r  b8 y! C4 K1 \! R
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 W1 D( ~0 ]& k7 w7 J) ^confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& T4 x( z4 p- T, o6 y9 a" @slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ ~# r% l4 i* I7 w; i+ R5 NIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 T4 m/ ~- v: u5 G; I! N
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
/ F2 a9 {' u" V6 H  Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
' [1 K3 w  r; b- L6 C1 ?" Q2 g. Z" }
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 b3 D* d  R( a/ V8 L9 \market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and  Z+ F( N" I" J  }$ c8 f
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
8 {8 l; U# }4 A/ o  U) X; S; Aare markedly different than those found in the United States.. n9 e; y$ v* n

. W; `+ e0 P$ @9 Q7 c3 @1 ~    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the- p9 `, Q* X3 ^3 p6 f7 Z# `+ v: Q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
) s3 }+ A3 x8 W8 t$ m3 C  Pfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% m  H0 G; r) X; h0 M! L+ D
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% n7 a3 |/ k+ R  maffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the/ k% e( |8 X. [% Y5 }/ R+ ~
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, H" {& ?" R2 \$ Jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 e5 J+ ~. \/ G! V
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 g2 _) o5 F, g. Y( d
3 F5 ]" G; x, P5 p4 W  F
    <<5 s: _% A; \1 @' [0 m
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
5 F2 x/ m. ?0 V    >>
! H" m* w7 K( J% Z) D6 W4 X
: y9 S6 M0 X6 R% s- F  _4 }" ^    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" t3 i# D. V* o* J  {
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, ]9 c4 X4 o. ~. nof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time7 @- h/ D+ p8 R1 F. Q# l/ t' b4 L
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" R0 H& N! K: W# v4 arenovations.8 g4 W5 [) ~' n  _% S

) m  l6 N$ w0 S% A* c6 M. Q4 |    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& \% e7 t" S- P, m
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
2 F" n- p: U4 Kcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
! e( n1 [3 w) }0 t. W* O, i8 CSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 k, |# j9 K- X( f

! c& f; R  ]- p% W% D7 X    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
9 h" m5 B8 Y, _( N+ E( ^6 r: U4 nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
1 |4 S8 O  r: R. O: o$ gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( S3 _) y; t# h6 i& m
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
* w  V5 d8 O/ w" Qto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
) C: v  L0 W4 `4 B. W' Y2 X8 wand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
* K. q9 r; G5 g+ Q) j$ b; u( b0 Y8 b- P4 [! i  o1 H
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# w' I5 k/ a2 F9 V& J4 rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( y$ X8 _! x& A0 Z6 g* d
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; {! ^  ?* Y1 g$ C' ]" Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian) U( U* F+ M# R# t3 ~/ D; g
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 q1 T6 j( h4 |) m) @- M4 [) gbuyers with more options when looking for a home.4 {# j( Y4 V) _
# z/ Q6 J' s; ]% ^" Z  y
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; q' j3 |: `2 E7 _- ~6 n* D( z( Gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, g' x8 c8 Z1 O% ^1 e, w" X8 _+ n
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 \8 o& C2 G9 A9 B. J; l+ D- k
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last, Q  k. ]; q5 L4 x+ o7 t1 L
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.  W  E' Y. ~6 n) M/ Z: Z" ?# }( J

( w3 o! I( a" G    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. F0 s6 R( j" c8 Q% o5 [2 D6 wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory  W3 v# @" r& s; e6 |
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 S  r0 p/ R9 l0 tfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, i5 Q* P' \+ }5 I  l; X/ lwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: x- f" J) T( b) H- Opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) i' L' W( |7 _6 x6 F$ a( i/ }3 c
making a purchase.7 ~( a3 f* c9 u& J5 A: C$ Z% T0 \6 m
8 t3 c4 |+ H" z1 ~: ?
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing, j4 @3 g+ S6 o$ c/ w# |
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
2 k' Q; s( Y+ s! ]5 }3 nconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, l9 t( S6 `, P" ?) E
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting2 F& E; R! g. Q7 W! a
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
" ]4 @2 h1 q: J( Namenities.
# c$ ?9 d& `+ M+ ^2 |/ n8 X" \1 u
! c3 a7 n! U5 \# N% E    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" Q! L8 k+ p& A' e
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand4 t- ~( `( S0 A0 l8 T# g+ L& X4 i
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 [5 M6 [9 N" @) V6 a' P
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 m% ~5 p& m7 j7 s. Q0 ?
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
, T) \9 ?& Z% i% q1 D+ Jresidence, rather than for investment.
; p/ @  y6 x) p6 u* g; W+ f
: x5 z9 Q* ?9 o: g0 c: r    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& p% T2 p) G/ r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ h: }1 W6 Y4 g
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' d2 S0 P) L+ J; Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! l1 r/ U8 b( n- J/ z. Vrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" ?% F$ |3 @% S3 L8 k7 Z
the market.
8 E) `* y6 C& s1 {& S; U0 T0 Q% Q) x* n3 i
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
- L! M) Y; i* B* hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In  c, Z5 V5 u# F8 ~# E- z
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
: b3 P* F2 x' v3 F$ I; r  ymonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
7 k9 ^/ ~0 n: q% k3 fto the shortage of available inventory.
# Z- C9 H- Z$ F8 i
! S, o+ K/ s4 I8 i5 S; `: Z    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
* c$ ^% g! ^4 p- o- W. Q% G- Y+ emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
' u. J* ^. I2 e' @5 D5 ]vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 P9 w- o; n. nstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: [, f) n% g$ q- q: F% N/ U) ?# X  o6 u

1 U" F! m5 q6 ?    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 ^0 d: C5 c* a5 [" Qin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% q- Y0 E7 y- V6 [3 g
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
$ W0 b& I2 R: Qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- L4 t" s5 X: U& [: Rprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 ]% o. q* o5 Y  c9 K( q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
  q% M  ~$ }8 ]; \5 nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

- r' T- x5 P7 Q6 v0 }) N: a
7 a: g& n9 }+ ~' N    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ N  k9 `4 `" R" r9 _( ?$ sas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& D% a% |' T: ?* K9 I0 y6 D% g4 V
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,: b. X5 `7 V& t1 d' M5 J6 X: ^
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' R1 n6 z6 D; o' I
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! |$ K/ f7 }8 I2 c3 J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 x9 {& {4 I" y8 W4 }5 h
towards the end of 2006.
   
4 L6 L8 V% i5 F0 C( y% X$ n3 y& o
" A( N" h; n$ C: O7 }While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% ~4 r$ n3 t. t7 K5 M4 dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable" g  w* H4 N% E- b& E0 x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 L( w& ~8 T4 ]: Ngroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 P; k4 D2 j. V' {# }. r* z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) K" V+ \0 @. T' r- v0 ?
pressure on tight inventory levels.6 e6 A" r3 _. B6 G$ t, g
* _/ `; v% |" c" L) T% v, W/ G
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& K1 R2 G1 ~' }6 S- j
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people/ Z$ X: w; ?7 U# }0 ~
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 I2 c" A3 r* c6 ~9 ]" |
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: Z0 F' F' s% I8 u1 C1 dfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; D3 H& C( e* a8 d" j' w
% d3 _4 k5 \9 J4 d2 G( b+ W    <<7 d% i: C6 X0 l# h
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 W# W" w% T7 i1 m

4 o% t5 w, Y2 ]0 Y% R$ E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, H. ?. B* A- O/ v  g                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
* p1 Y1 U7 Z4 Z( E7 Q: D" x8 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( {8 e4 T$ p, @2 e/ t8 ]4 u4 g
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
0 r2 ?6 Y# g) j( e* n$ @    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
( U) W1 Q0 ~/ m6 x9 [) V" t8 r; J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# j1 e  X; w' u% V    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
+ F& o5 M7 L# H9 T2 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^! [7 n' ]( u% l0 Z# w
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
+ y9 f# S" ~2 E; B, g" D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 i5 K7 a( B1 K# k    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
1 c+ \5 H: E" b0 o5 m1 o) g, x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ P+ ?, r! O1 m& q* z% W
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
2 j# w  h+ h7 C+ Y5 _3 M, Z1 @2 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Q! d6 X1 z" A9 K3 g    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
3 U( D+ ], u1 _2 Q' w$ y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( g+ d9 M" w+ @/ X6 n    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5838 i% N5 _3 R3 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 W5 ]' N& ^' M( t& d2 z$ A    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
, Z( @# @: B- I' n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, j' ^5 j3 ]! G4 e3 u' q    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2506 r; s% f- @5 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 d: O  s# v9 V& D  A! c
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766. e1 F; b1 l* C: k' i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 F) {6 ^  Y" O" G
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7072 T/ `! C+ m% F; `$ l/ l2 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% N. Y7 @: g6 G3 w* ?6 w
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; s' o, x* s0 j6 P: J- W( p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 v$ V( Y& R( t0 M! e5 R/ C    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389- O) T$ D+ l$ ^  P% H0 M8 h  H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~! z6 F4 L0 X8 u$ c1 t0 f( k5 O
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714' w) f, \, s& w5 b9 _' ?( t3 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 q1 `; [- }; Y+ D! {
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500+ |5 e9 e4 u/ b, @( g1 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 l7 f4 ]! \6 R) R7 t7 H, q
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000- _+ W& r& l0 v8 ~% y3 G5 l# X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' H) V0 j# P" E; G: R; N    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
% _1 j1 L; p% f! j2 G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 O  W- v0 M: J) c; U

- u  p  z% S% H" d) u/ S+ ^* s    -------------------------------------------------------------) P; f! _; x" t/ j
                               Standard Condominium9 T1 Z6 q! }  m3 ^: y8 @6 A4 m; \* b
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 j1 _9 a  @: d9 r- Z* G
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
0 Q5 f1 e5 v4 g- C) L    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change7 E& o# G2 i' {/ s9 N8 |8 ~: {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' d( C+ X2 Z1 @    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%; j2 v: `+ s+ l# W2 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------, c- u; P4 C; Q9 |
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
+ O2 g+ f& A1 [% E8 ]  a$ f    -------------------------------------------------------------
. @0 z, J. D# F9 B  v1 ~    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
. `6 k' a' e/ h6 R7 g; n    -------------------------------------------------------------/ |+ R$ g. a9 m/ I
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
# B% C4 t0 B8 ^7 E( |( X    -------------------------------------------------------------
  S" s2 a6 Q( o, X. m0 G    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
" @; F; j0 B0 L+ C1 u    -------------------------------------------------------------
) [" E, f2 c5 K1 }7 _: i    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%, o2 m# k/ Q; o8 R) N/ N8 q# R0 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------" v: V7 s+ \: d8 V
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
# {) O/ o9 B" T4 R    -------------------------------------------------------------" i0 i# J3 y7 l1 I
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
6 h7 {' h- Z8 }$ Z5 G0 F. f    -------------------------------------------------------------; m: J  e2 p0 N
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
* i7 h* a9 {; }4 B& Q& K- k, A    -------------------------------------------------------------4 u* e! R3 c9 G/ ?2 b
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%* g) e* c* ?. {/ S  X5 e) d
    -------------------------------------------------------------, E! X* M  ]9 |! U3 D
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
5 S' Y5 `% z5 Q8 y( @' J    -------------------------------------------------------------+ ]. F6 R5 a2 P! i. ]$ P9 g1 J
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
! x! b% g. l  S* |4 P6 r    -------------------------------------------------------------5 S; u6 V1 R1 C6 S4 v
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
6 u; ~; l# c3 y" h# Z) ~6 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------, y5 w( H1 @3 P# B
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
4 F1 p/ P' x+ L0 W! |+ m# U    -------------------------------------------------------------
: o% Q! f. m% f- }) P. G# E    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
; }  J" M, V. Y0 J* S4 J+ t, \    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 z+ g' \- S1 o    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
% n; O+ l6 l1 `& a& N/ H    -------------------------------------------------------------, M) \4 t- }; G7 w6 ~
    >>
& s: x( v, d0 z5 }* A7 b, a& P$ z
: x. O! t9 K' |! X( }+ X! i# B    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
6 ~' d0 E: Y4 Q( Iin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ v/ I% V# Q9 l( X
John and Victoria." D/ ^7 A7 f7 g* q1 G- N

; H3 Y2 R! v6 d' i, l! K8 f  l- k    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
' ^, B. S8 B- C8 A, Ucomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 }: Z! P: O! D& s. x7 D- k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
  C6 B( d( }. G+ c4 d" U9 }$ r- Nreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price. h2 ?+ r) E  H9 l. S: N) k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities# w6 Y; g4 |0 t" t/ R) P( B
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
6 \3 ?* }% Q& ]3 Iavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) d& S, T- M& G' i) t/ R4 ~* x3 R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% i% J% s. j) ^5 t* G
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 U' X+ @5 l! |  `November 15, 2006.
9 `/ q- N% R1 N    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( R  Z- o. U4 z0 y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge: [/ O& F' ~; n/ u. R5 Z7 a$ W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 {; J3 `) @8 O" E: }
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-6 08:29 , Processed in 1.083120 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表