埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2512|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
! A( G, Y9 u7 f# T: \1 _$ J( R) N) d( _6 n
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# \% W9 g' [5 R$ }3 w" i+ A$ K

; m$ w! m) D1 h! z7 h, s    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
. g- _. I' `" v3 b( S8 B4 Y$ }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) A! z4 g8 q( k6 L0 _- K0 f
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic6 c1 |4 a: x3 E: Q8 i5 q
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! n8 `3 i1 K: P) L( p) D: eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ S" g2 \' [/ d$ Fmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
4 [& e" i; n. d/ EQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
3 N: C: F( ]- yLePage Real Estate Services.
% c9 G) b. K4 f7 l7 M  S2 u
) I6 a6 J, t6 M6 d    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters5 ]+ l" C. b( V9 F' [
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 s$ n5 B, [2 e8 f8 j2 W, Y1 c6 |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ E4 X0 M: [& c+ W5 L; y7 v+ Zsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the5 k6 F) b9 `1 }4 X8 i& U- G
residential real estate sector.3 m0 L; P' z* X* Y% ?+ M

* ^6 {5 J4 _3 G" G+ p3 M3 h    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% Y, _  L9 C- S$ m1 b0 r
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# l' e8 D+ F. i& q# Hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 A) O' }. c4 D0 z0 w+ C3 f' i4 l
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
5 W. x% W! b% c0 [# y(+13.2%).
/ J5 g: d! W  V7 N  ]
+ {6 M* w, s8 i    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. C3 E3 i# L3 {during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 S/ N; L7 q! S+ u) y6 O2 i
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
, A% [; G: T* }+ tpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' t/ V4 W+ X3 X
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
9 p! U; V& k7 o7 y/ r"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
+ n+ l' r, b* \9 rwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  I( K# q* v: I  Xbalanced market."
$ A$ ]) ]4 h$ j+ s3 i; O2 ~
4 ?# y7 {  t# A) {6 @; ?2 m    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
3 Z4 r0 e; {( G* N( Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 p& U( _9 ~8 V/ Q7 S
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
* ^9 M0 Q$ S3 d/ r- X# J* k4 L0 lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 S! r  v) G7 B. L2 h) Q" Oenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 A( S1 r2 d$ r. z4 z( I
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 D5 W3 Q$ s5 Abreaking price appreciations.5 O# j/ O. M8 e" n
( Q& I5 R' k0 l6 X- t! `6 |
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding8 ?2 q* b2 D; B: }; L$ S1 Q
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 q  A' C3 D& t
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 U, O4 E; r1 M0 \9 Q+ _
* u+ T6 t7 S. }! ^    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid2 N' C6 M) @  Z3 B9 g0 d( K3 Y- |
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- F' Q: N4 c* qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 L" ]) h) s. `+ v5 y8 M* R5 l
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.3 x7 v. b3 ]& ]( v
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" V. A) |0 Y* U. W; T/ B# d
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 [5 n8 v+ ?- @/ [4 t) D! w
price appreciation when compared with 2005.2 s# }& p" y( l8 m

5 ^! c& o$ p5 m1 N    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; _$ ~  ]% P0 }# u7 v" O* u
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 f8 G) p/ I7 q- p8 f  j
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% N" E$ I) `& S6 @# q
are markedly different than those found in the United States.! A- P3 ~( o% N/ C% ^

0 f# b8 `+ s8 k6 z( c9 E    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
5 j: F$ F& h4 A3 |% u3 d! x; dAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's8 H- {& ]+ h% i# l- b6 O
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
9 X( R, a2 u2 }2 rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ h) |; x6 c  Y' l7 e
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the5 v1 i  O6 F- I5 z$ G* F) R* r
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! ^) ]( Q) N* c0 caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: p3 k/ f: N* @* S# c7 Z
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
3 o) V  i8 D" n* C1 p6 Z
, e. K+ Q! B$ H* E* t- I/ R    <<4 p) _. i2 C8 }2 B, d+ ]
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* {4 p) \+ y$ w% n2 b0 Z- d
    >>6 R5 }9 z. T" x, p2 Q5 K4 |

4 K. x/ @4 g  L% u5 w- i    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 L+ h2 N+ u! p/ O, L2 E
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
: {. h" t2 B/ g% e# J8 rof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 @. b* o5 |4 S2 h) M: u+ p
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of0 g3 u9 a  X! B# [7 B: Z
renovations.
: `0 d+ N0 a; r0 c+ G) ?1 w3 t& B
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight2 B% A2 T9 a- y! F" ?" p% ^$ X
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- U' V+ i6 a  `$ w
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, v9 W3 i6 Q1 ?9 w* `& g
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& V, ~! t% P+ K
8 Z. I. p' H7 [! c* E
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer  n, q" ]) F3 M: ?
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
$ p! U. |  Z. l2 o5 Jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 X* h* v% A' q8 e! f
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores; }! Y; W5 ~7 \5 @, v1 d, o
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 W/ ~& j2 \5 cand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
. E4 p( }! y9 ?" F* q+ k' X- C
+ V, ]6 ^  W' J, H- k    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced  s3 n' H& V1 v% q3 v. {# ?/ r
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ s. f- i# e: R2 `5 Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers/ r* b: f% O- i5 d: p% k8 H
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian, `& y# s' Z5 k; Z' a  _
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing& m9 R7 \  |: \7 y
buyers with more options when looking for a home., _) v" K0 I  P% L

* K3 S5 }2 V* n" `% U    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* i. Q# S! J' N9 Y+ o; H$ Q1 Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes* X0 k5 k5 y2 j  [, Q
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
( O! `: k1 n% G' jas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* ?- Y- E4 p. {4 T! u
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 u, D8 |# j% V' ~# C. J& W& ~1 {+ D6 U1 F( U7 U
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house) Q5 c+ J( W9 J5 e$ f4 A
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" X" N: @0 P0 W; X1 b  elevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting2 E/ K$ ?! F$ X7 {- A! \* g
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 X: W. S3 `" f5 Y
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: p, v! @% S: X  C0 W
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: @) E* C& {2 p' d/ p. R7 V
making a purchase.
  H) a5 f+ a) ~: m: v8 ~/ O8 B/ _2 n. Q' T+ N' x. |
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing1 ?* y& v" d9 e& q9 x; Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
/ d/ z, r8 {' F8 G& k& gconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" V: K& E# l8 B0 {% Mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; c1 @' g, Y7 T( I3 T6 Sattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 p/ ]0 [" H9 q. i6 l" Xamenities.
- U5 f9 d% u  O5 Z% n
& T( t# z) M! A: @8 Y    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' O+ S1 c4 J' z  r6 V1 p
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* @: n7 l  |" D$ uacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has6 L$ ~3 F. D' G/ O6 q/ R
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" M! u9 T1 C; h2 v, s  y+ odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
, d! F  b% L) D: y: w* I7 r( Oresidence, rather than for investment.
1 ^: ]8 h7 i+ A  Q+ K
0 q+ S/ M- s7 {    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' l% |2 h5 L+ j  Ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* C0 P: M, j' s5 o: a. l+ Fin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- e; m% S8 L( f: Y; e+ n2 G7 v2 g
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization/ G( I5 ~4 G5 S. E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# l( {  T+ `' n0 w) w* L
the market.
6 U7 Q9 a+ G. ?' \: G3 ]8 I0 l$ S3 M* x5 N
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# j) B# p* L! ~7 {! b+ n& `/ D
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, ^1 }9 H; V! j  \1 ?$ B) F7 \1 i
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring9 ~( Z) f  i! I! ]/ e. x
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
# t# Z% |% G# o5 Y! Fto the shortage of available inventory.
+ t! H3 U1 v& e0 w$ A. y7 s6 F$ T$ c+ q. H6 P8 {) G) Z
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 w2 K7 ?! _$ m3 m- C/ qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; O0 R% k* x4 Y+ _! k1 }) {6 P( |
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses/ ~* v4 t% b& q% g
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
% e1 A: v* |( ]/ b5 S# b4 `; k7 x9 U( @( W! L6 C" _; `
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
4 a" N4 q$ ]! A: k* P- w. Z& ~in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low6 x1 I/ m4 P  r- K
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% t3 @( b& p. j0 \
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
" L3 Q) J1 {( i4 e7 Iprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( Y3 U- r0 e% N6 V, v7 w
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* f) m6 v/ c3 I* C
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, ?9 U! W8 ?6 ?' [# L" W
& U7 L; a& [9 I2 \- N3 l
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, i9 c, K$ w# c4 }; V
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton. c2 }. C( h( E0 K
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,$ a$ _; h7 w4 J6 q2 E
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 N2 H" m2 l, r: u8 N
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve& |7 Z6 T" K7 A0 J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 T5 p" C" F+ x/ V0 {% W( y4 g
towards the end of 2006.
    4 ~' B: |/ `5 F# l; }  V2 h$ y7 Z
8 |) C+ h# U6 Z, |
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: v+ i1 M0 \* j& `! Z, M: D
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable% K/ w2 I' c" N9 x9 P+ c" E/ e6 \3 e9 v6 U
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: u; b6 v# n: H8 o# i4 q# M
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 Q+ \" V0 u5 O3 b0 _3 K/ h) [
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" U  y# x* N8 v: r5 N; p% |
pressure on tight inventory levels.
, m" a( i3 _& K* @; t7 }/ e0 W* }: T
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, R. f/ Q- Y' Z5 }2 k4 h9 [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 g, [0 f- x  T2 ~8 n& s6 d$ Tinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;* `$ U- I, F# w$ s# T2 ?
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
  G- `, n) h8 |& \+ j( @! k5 o- A+ {4 pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
0 h' U- s' E. L  U2 h9 p
+ p. \" b. m9 Z& e( e6 J    <<
+ V9 P/ F1 }% F      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
; d8 C; n- z; h
" O9 D* D$ F3 q; G5 \& |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ z# r1 y/ i% O. L, }4 a  D
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
7 G9 ?" Y, o/ W" a! I4 C5 j4 v% o* h9 w: @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  C1 @9 f1 V- z6 A( Q+ B                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3- Q! @: K8 C) z: d
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
: X  c4 q/ x6 ~5 `0 L# {4 G4 R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 x0 V! }* S' T, L' q    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000% e2 S5 u2 \& ^8 Z' `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 l. q+ ?: |1 C
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000+ f4 e4 T3 F4 f5 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A/ Z% P8 ^8 c3 `8 G4 z; s+ v    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 z: Y" Z- @. u8 h2 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( M( y4 U' ]8 f. z  y# Q6 g; B1 y; G    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -& g3 J, s/ n/ i4 ^/ c9 ?1 K! m* [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* I; c* d" C$ ?/ T+ S$ C    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333  r+ {9 Z3 l! a8 `. y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ j& R& `4 |7 c3 U5 A$ }, E    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
  k) o% M) \* y- f# [; _1 f* Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 T8 f# c- q) W- o
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1852 b. A  |. A$ |1 v' Y2 j) {9 I5 l  D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- r2 x7 G0 |  Z& e% D
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
  c/ [9 i  K% \! @2 k4 C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~# s9 v# j- e( ?) B, l. \' p  P    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766" @. |  i6 g- {# D4 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 F, f7 m8 c, |- b# P
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707. O' ^2 p* a* Z, A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: I( H  \  N& e, T# r    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 G& i% B9 ]% {( }1 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 c  }5 T3 S9 M    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389& L( H9 n, v5 B5 _' V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) x5 u4 c3 j2 k/ ?
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714% a/ ^2 S0 Y2 }" l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 C4 z8 I; b- k5 s6 H0 n" Y- v% j
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500' Z8 R0 R$ ~$ w1 W  M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 }$ l  [/ w! _6 y: m
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
5 w# F/ l2 k1 H% e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ^* T) |5 Z6 }# ~8 k) Z" U    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860' ~; A4 A& R$ e. l9 R, V- _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a7 a# b) ]- O0 D4 \2 Z
& a; G( F4 z2 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------; K( S9 C* z8 E+ N- W  t. v
                               Standard Condominium4 A0 n, `: S7 |/ C& G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 [7 D7 l6 Y1 ~0 Y7 q, q6 I                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
! q  q8 e" a2 a1 X; ^) t    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
$ M# [$ E* n8 F" {/ d# f  e    -------------------------------------------------------------& j- A# r" h4 F; \& X, Z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
8 j; p- G- [7 F1 J    -------------------------------------------------------------4 Y  N/ O0 q) t* R) R) X+ K( R" J
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
$ m! W: W/ s: l! j6 B! B& i    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 w: B+ M. w2 c+ V, x; A, i8 G    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A4 i5 b. Y: L8 x' c9 X0 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------& H9 ^1 I# ]/ {( b
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
7 h5 C" Q( J( U3 }    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 c$ |  B# J  q$ S! i9 @# R+ z9 ]    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
4 U4 A7 d/ T9 J0 V6 [7 Q9 y0 c    -------------------------------------------------------------$ ~0 F7 E4 P  o' @; J
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%% `# h8 s. F5 P8 D2 v7 |" r! c1 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' G& H4 _% o) R# X- Y- i    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
% J* P" I5 t9 W8 L& x6 F. S    -------------------------------------------------------------0 K' ]3 i4 |% O3 H8 t* }! w9 w
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
- I4 e( K- S0 K. Y    -------------------------------------------------------------( N/ C+ p, F8 D# n9 d: I
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
& d1 Y" C+ J5 K+ H    -------------------------------------------------------------* ^/ Y' V( h7 n# p5 `2 w" c. q  L
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
5 O: N% E: B5 q  M" M5 g    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 [" I# w% ~$ {9 h+ _8 h    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
0 f2 ^2 P  ?$ r; @! ]    -------------------------------------------------------------# ^1 H0 ]' {8 _% H9 i
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) e0 T( n! ]4 Q! _8 i8 c    -------------------------------------------------------------1 g2 j+ T3 Z0 z) b
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
5 ~: x1 Y* G% M3 r" x& q0 O- H* X    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 I0 a( J- y2 B$ H9 I2 x    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%6 [8 K3 _2 o/ ]6 k% g" g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  _+ b& T: k2 r  @$ A' ~! I    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%1 j7 B) m- ~3 k; u
    -------------------------------------------------------------) j! O2 z, C  F0 L6 L
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# P/ p5 [- l9 {/ s4 l8 q% R$ l    -------------------------------------------------------------
- B4 d% P/ _) h/ p# ~8 N# Q    >>- `; z/ w3 b% x) I# L5 {
4 I; R* R& y6 G1 c6 B
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined7 n8 h" h$ d9 Z6 n' T  M
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. S3 u9 K- E" N# Y  k5 J- S5 `John and Victoria.
2 Q" z1 t& ]4 A, L+ X3 r
5 Z. z, a) V2 y9 T+ ]# p9 ^    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% E* ]' E$ ~# T, k( M  r
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of" I- s2 |. W# ~2 n: M; @
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release3 g4 J4 |# t% o$ h- m
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price& @, r, ]! X+ q5 }
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 {, }% A; x6 ]
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. O+ s  v& t* J# B% N/ z3 pavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; S! Y9 m# {, ]% y& b
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable$ h( @" @: \9 m1 }
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' H- S3 z8 ^5 b' I) }November 15, 2006.: g3 f7 P! x! M5 B
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 ~+ h) V7 b% Z+ r9 G- {0 {% k0 efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
" Z4 g. i' j6 Wprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 M8 @9 z  ^9 S/ {9 v. Z- |" l
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-28 22:23 , Processed in 0.204409 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表