请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

2 L2 A" ]+ R: t+ h# n值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

0 X: Q" a4 ?8 X值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

2 h! _* S9 w& G* n+ U6 ?' J8 q! u8 ^去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

8 Y  A4 w8 n0 P, `) E1 G+ m眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
  B, u3 ?; F, HAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
3 G! k# L( j) \0 n% @100% Complete: Yes
/ N/ @8 g! m) Y. g4 y6 s+ L3 eNeighbourhood: Richford
6 s+ E6 X& j/ f- s1 ?Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
& C, I. L1 a" p5 j+ X: mYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
% x0 l' ^) C! F4 R/ }Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
  Q0 D; t$ t: c$ [# S- ~2 vBasement Development: No
  }. y# i# M  p: ?/ Y9 I. gGarage: Yes
4 I# _6 Q9 N% z) a, H+ p8 nFireplace: Yes
& @6 o" h8 O4 V: t* x9 b0 v4 |Walkout Basement: No
% T7 m: O3 L4 E( o! jAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
, K4 o# r! `8 E0 e7 {
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.