$ l7 k' g5 s) A! M2 GRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. # K! z0 Q& R+ T1 \; g3 \/ T w. jThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. * d' `3 J, ~/ r 4 }) x( j1 A' p- w. ~1 q
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?- Y$ x* u2 T. g5 ~, e1 c/ J
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. y9 O9 A. D- u% L: M. r6 U
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.# M x9 l; u N' b
. s- j+ k) k+ ^& O# b; @! d: _+ ]% m& U$ B) F. `
K b" D! A4 ]9 e+ D7 @; j
* I0 v6 y7 r( c. c
2 d; `5 ~5 L9 c/ G/ p: W
9 D4 i( @' e: c! n( x# V( G; E
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
7 i1 g4 X$ _0 M, b3 _) H' F0 [+ O6 x, A9 B# a `
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,4 j/ A* M) T, R( Q: x$ l( w# S
0 V3 j \! @+ E/ Q
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实% A) w5 E% D2 E, A; Z