 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑 . b. R* R( q. u) _
你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧：CIVIC和卡车撞，谁比谁更吸能？谁比谁更容易死？3 \/ r9 P) e+ \3 s) u! \. S
降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 
# u7 V& Z% `( D1 ]There is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.
7 [4 |. s' w" q- `8 G9 f1 W) B, k+ X( N' M. ]9 n( N
From the existing data, there are 3 types of death:
) u% N. n t9 E9 L$ e5 b! _1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck4 f3 W. _- ? \
2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over! z; I6 Z2 ~2 L
3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.
3 X9 V. K: x* U# [
1 E( t, p# S, X- h+ I! N! EFor Honda Civic:; w+ U' b* y6 Q, G- w7 t3 _% E+ c
MV 34' H) ]2 g' F8 x' G$ e
SV 332 u/ l- E/ m1 s; `5 t! P
SV Roll 13
$ H- X& V: }: O5 |; L/ W4 J; `6 e" h3 [- b# p) p
For Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):1 g8 H, U6 v3 s) [+ `
MV 28~34% p, C/ x2 U/ o& w4 w' x
SV 79~94/ }: L0 O' {, c0 A d( f. U
SV Roll 48~82
' A" G$ X% V0 t, O4 j4 h- {
7 e: r1 B# q+ U. qFor Chevy Silverado 1500:% d$ i5 y n) W5 S
MV 40, @9 \) `+ b8 e! ?4 C; j
SV 85
' N M% e6 V9 F# P; ]5 RSV Roll 61
! F0 q% O9 \! t7 ~# v" n$ @
3 }; v6 d! g) ~. c; L, U: d9 U% KAs you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|
楼主: kismet
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-12-20 16:58
显身卡
