 鲜花( 53)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
This is a column by Mike Holmes in today Journal. Holmes, in this article, has detailed some very good points which I failed to say it clear in my previous postings. It's worthy to have a read but for those who are too busy to do that, I would like to summarize it as follows and hope it would work as an alarm clock for those who rely on inspectors to determine a back-off or go-ahead decision on one of the biggest investment ever in their lives.
/ x' J8 K' z8 n1. Currently, no national licensing and no federal regulations for inspectors-some may have joined membership of inspectors organizations, but it is believed that they use it as a marketing tool.
. D* V" E+ V$ Y# j3 ]7 L2. Home inspection may only provide the public with a false sense of security-they don't have liability insurance; in cases they fail to notice major problems or mistakes were made, you can sue them for only the amount you paid them, i.e. the inspection fee; the expensive costs of repairs will be on your own ( since March,2009, B.C. is the 1st province to offer such protection)
+ H/ w, l/ u9 U3 A. | E3. Anyone can claim to be an inspector and many of them are self-taught., O% k! a. H' o8 x) h
1 N! x; \: `/ z) m* Z9 _/ u8 ] So, when your inspector reports too many of minor problems like nail pop-ups, dripping faucets while there is no other serious deficiencies such as leaking roof or foundation walls, it doesn't mean you need an instant back-off but be alert and make sure your inspector knows what he has done and no check-up for serious problems was missed. |
|