 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly" \5 g" y$ s2 d. K( u
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
& K+ Z' r0 s" @! ~ F$ @' [+ Ounsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house' Q q8 o i% c5 M
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
/ m& S8 M0 h- h- s1 L1 d7 F" k+ U5 qfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This+ T* M& L9 A0 S/ u
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction- e/ T0 N% H6 g* ^( j. K( ^3 r
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately0 t# t( h3 n8 J
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past O2 L; _5 y+ I1 T8 ~9 G
three years.( ?1 _8 }& R9 L( U
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from0 ^* f2 G' Y: u
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of K2 ~- |( R1 z. S7 v9 e
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
$ M* B- g- b" k# t' ?) M X3 A& mboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices2 Z% V0 H1 y" p/ f& k2 K
to fundamentally justified levels.
$ w/ U8 ~* N; g8 K3 R8 H3 i: UWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
+ t0 l6 y! C* |5 W* ~where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
- \1 y6 P7 f, p! k0 x' sthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”: p) h* I' P. l
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
! o+ h; I2 h% athere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
! l+ G: f1 n1 x2 l) R2 w. y“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
1 q# w9 j* Z1 vhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch5 ^" c V1 x4 F
that is now being rapidly reined in.; G! M3 y7 N( ]
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,' T& ^" {' I9 J; D( ^+ D
the construction of too many new homes over the boom9 l5 k8 a3 I5 q- a: t+ f) B
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh( k% K# z( z4 ~3 i
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers" F$ [: o1 X7 `% J/ }
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
4 i* h9 H3 z: {- S3 eremain choppy and new residential construction will be
$ P+ |: U: h# e5 @dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction/ _% }5 [5 [4 J3 h
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this2 t8 H5 f9 Y$ d% f
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
% e h# N5 n9 I& |0 n- a: `. wresidential construction will fall further to around- |( n! z# N V1 i2 y
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units3 W- i) [( @" @0 B$ _* q
in the fourth quarter.9 C. F) v9 V6 A& n
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,# Q0 r. R$ G& ~. X; Q: }7 c
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
+ i% f8 H' ]! S6 V1 {) f( V# afundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each( e3 z* d" ~# x4 b' e9 R9 ]# J
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home/ x# U$ E( b0 F$ m! f
values since house prices should track incomes over the' N$ w. w/ V: {% o7 l
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we9 x! h9 _( m) J& K$ [% I
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
; R4 y" |* b( S0 j3 G: Pof residential construction.
. x- D8 f# Z/ V- {6 X5 |To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a! r6 C0 W0 S+ C# v/ H
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction: o3 N% F9 L y' D+ M3 |
would have occurred if housing had been priced
" v k. Q9 O# ?6 |6 e- f2 L' Woptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( \% P: O2 V/ l8 ~7 a+ |
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new5 Q3 m: |. M! v, |
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too* K1 S% M# z: }% B
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
$ _* w! v. K# l1 H" ~. ARegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies," k# j2 E! \7 P" j
where housing demand will further contract under waning
w @2 N2 q/ |* Q7 A: ]population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
9 Z3 C) y8 ^ ]% dalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the3 K) @3 n h$ {. w
very time that the resale market has swung into strong' Y( y2 L" _# n5 a% }
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
\% P4 H# X% n" phas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
# Y b5 B+ _/ g6 Fweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.5 a1 M0 \3 _+ O# T2 ]6 ~
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
7 k3 s) x1 E& F2 i4 c: y5 Sstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
. r( Q7 ^) ^' Y6 h! kMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
% p5 s4 T1 Y A, y, C) ^3 T6 n2 ^given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership7 t7 M4 P' Y- {1 k
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a$ t7 [% b) n3 [- H
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
6 N5 l( _1 {4 _, F9 Dlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" r! }- Y3 I. L! {. f, |# z5 O& Ncondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 m6 V+ b1 t4 L2 n7 Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under2 Q9 U% n2 H' H2 }; S6 B
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
9 E! ^$ J$ o/ M3 t! p5 C2 v$ lreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as/ N+ ?! f2 m1 p1 |6 c( Q
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
" k$ j. ?/ y- R4 v$ }" o. |) I' C, rspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while0 z8 d0 F9 G4 C0 ?# _6 l. `& t
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we2 h4 P# v. f/ @2 A! w
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
6 ^$ C# r, I+ R7 l+ sinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
- y( c$ o! V9 @* }1 J5 F( ?years, which, along with improvements in affordability,. X3 R8 T v3 q$ X9 D) B2 m
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
6 n i' W) D( p _" V, j* ROVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! d! f( u" o l. ?. W
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS0 y9 Y6 V6 [3 v# b2 D
Grant Bishop, Economist
. L) \( Y0 l1 e416-982-8063# A9 n4 H- ~& @, L# a) P9 C
Pascal Gauthier, Economist" Y& A5 u0 o8 q
416-944-5730' r; y& j) e; G5 D3 Z! d9 O
3 h$ I! d5 u& o' I2 [
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|