埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2073|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
7 R5 b$ S4 |; V. Yfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove; n9 {1 ]1 i$ j* M( {
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
" v$ C2 V9 v* ]9 Gprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by& y# w% F7 R+ o1 p' o7 @5 a( I( j' a/ R
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This  G# o1 e! g0 c3 W! a
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
" `0 |" z' t8 B3 L; Ethat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately' H# ~# Z% f( J: Y$ r
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past* F0 G% s; d( W! C& _2 r
three years.
: @% u4 B9 ^' l* K: @# |; S  P" M/ n! WBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from5 }' H& f) [3 ^, q+ S
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
& s5 R3 ?! ]% ~  N7 Maffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
9 ?: h8 l; _. z/ j! D2 C7 pboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& K( Q( X) `0 O( C
to fundamentally justified levels.
' n* G1 n5 A) J: \+ H# \We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”1 O) Y" ^  G7 r6 a
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and6 p! Y* M/ L& X2 B% J; x* L: V- A9 Y
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ Q% [  I# N! G
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
9 s2 }' h& T. vthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s3 ^8 q. s8 Y  f+ G
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
! P. T6 M' ~$ n3 E5 ~homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
5 `/ W& f% G8 ~. e5 t8 i! mthat is now being rapidly reined in.
* n$ I4 J9 d4 ?  d% T* I; pWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
* {* {7 T$ b- R1 F( t0 sthe construction of too many new homes over the boom6 Z6 X& `6 C3 {3 s& Y% g0 L0 A
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh5 s: v) n) n8 d& O5 W- \+ y
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers0 W* _  ]7 F  T8 W4 ?& x
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
, u6 G$ V5 \; o0 j0 v% Iremain choppy and new residential construction will be& _  E) G3 @  Y! e" b! N7 D
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
$ k+ Z' C" ~: H9 {8 ?6 ]  \' Jis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
  m6 B6 M& U$ B; R/ Kto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide% {7 A# H& C6 R& t) }
residential construction will fall further to around
' d' U8 R1 D  [. V& I+ N125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
6 z. u: m% G* z0 D4 y' y4 win the fourth quarter." P" F" b* ?0 H$ g" Y5 c
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding," X5 `0 L$ {& E- S/ F" Q! s1 E; \
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run+ w' a* g: _# Q9 O, C% |( u
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each4 T) D$ j! X$ `$ }
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home3 z. D( {1 b( Y1 C7 V
values since house prices should track incomes over the
3 t6 t8 A7 q1 _8 \8 H! F; I# @long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
9 D; Z  P9 z, d+ }1 ~6 A- w- b  Vregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers8 n7 C! ~. }4 u  K
of residential construction.
' l7 M  `7 v8 y. B) G& V3 e5 W; R6 OTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a" Q4 J* ]7 s- P; r/ j# C6 N
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
. B' Y+ G, \# Z/ q) V" I* Jwould have occurred if housing had been priced2 F* F8 o" }5 s. N
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
# x) h  d/ j$ W2 y: e% Y- G- Jfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new( t5 y* \* a" E( N- p
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too- _5 B" K8 u& x1 Q& d* T
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.6 o7 y3 ~1 r" Q, _6 G4 g
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,9 u) Q' J  z- F/ W6 T5 `
where housing demand will further contract under waning
$ f7 Q7 u3 ]" @6 r. T0 upopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are$ n' F% B( ]: m
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the& j  E4 a: s# ^2 n3 U
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
! q  o+ r; w2 Z7 ^$ abuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces' }& Q- v) F/ c; x
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural0 Q5 _5 ]6 ~$ z
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
9 L* K8 x  p. H' a6 B2 m/ HQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the" x* j: B2 K+ A8 f
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de( a( |3 w8 m* ~% k: O2 X  D  Y
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
+ ^: s9 Y4 Y2 d/ d4 ]& F* cgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership# E+ p+ {: f' k& ^# t
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. V4 T3 U8 M+ Z" i5 T! c/ Vcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
; S( W# `7 t9 ]8 j& Glimited – with the important exception of the Toronto/ f; u0 }- d" ]3 P5 `
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically4 G( @8 l! n' k. {& I9 u
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
) R( Y7 i' C7 e5 t2 j& p. aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will0 r7 D- T: F' J. K6 y: T% v
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
2 R7 T/ _% V/ \2 m5 x+ lcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could8 z1 v! a7 o' R- x) o: [
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while6 J, r: W3 E) b$ s# o+ p5 @
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we8 g1 ~  X$ h5 j. U0 D
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
$ S( u; x) Y# Dinter-provincial and international migration over the coming0 `; |$ e4 {& f
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,: G7 B  A7 t7 t4 v
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
( \0 E/ S; D0 T7 W& TOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
1 F* U8 l$ x* o3 Y4 P/ J9 b" NMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 s$ K7 W& J) I, {3 G
Grant Bishop, Economist
/ }! G9 k; p' S416-982-8063+ k, m, Z1 z4 }- \; E
Pascal Gauthier, Economist/ M, A4 h0 L; R1 W8 v2 A  C9 k9 V
416-944-57303 h7 H# s1 l# H1 G5 O

) B3 G, O% ?0 N/ ]$ s: J6 phttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-2 19:45 , Processed in 0.150580 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表