 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly( M( y& l# Y$ e M5 e' Z
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove2 L' u b1 A6 Z4 d, a( r
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
5 t$ F5 Z1 F& S2 u6 A* C: b7 \prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by0 z2 f F. t# F1 {% C' A2 n' H
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 |' {4 W& S. t2 y6 q' d' C% Y8 g5 b$ @overpricing compelled a level of residential construction# N, e" N& A- I8 D: W
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
5 D* T! Q; b; a/ h. E* E# r+ `! c% }( u12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
( b% L/ r4 X g5 o2 Cthree years.
) c' l! C* I. Z3 v( YBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from1 r8 u; f5 G+ ^, k2 x
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of- {* F( m8 H1 j: S8 A0 q) }
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 c" Y( g, s9 Y1 V6 Q# Rboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices7 H1 F. ^: C2 V# g) N9 X% I
to fundamentally justified levels.: ]# f, A) H; ~+ D: z; j
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
' g" Z6 R3 {. @" N) F/ K8 {! Dwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
! u& a0 F, C {- }- e! e* cthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”) r+ `- \& s) `3 P4 z7 R
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% k$ N8 F8 T* k m cthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s6 ^: K7 _5 j/ r1 p2 i v1 D4 Q
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
" I4 P9 v/ X& }% J/ chomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
+ O$ E% N! R0 z+ nthat is now being rapidly reined in.( O7 I: v/ @4 ?7 a" J% k
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,$ m! t# k: ^9 }
the construction of too many new homes over the boom/ _3 v% z% `7 [0 V3 y( |
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ G3 X) k( M: r* E. }5 j. [ `; u8 v
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers+ S% l$ x$ H2 s8 T' B1 L
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will+ X6 b3 x5 l- {5 J9 Z+ |1 E& \8 b, R7 T
remain choppy and new residential construction will be7 N3 T( d" W, i. x
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction$ Y/ F, @1 y" w' n! T5 @, i6 F
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this2 V F( p7 L% W' I5 C
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide9 J+ b! ^: g4 P# Y
residential construction will fall further to around
" g" G3 w* M; D. P+ {9 c) y8 D# R125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
9 o# j" I6 J1 G) y. ^9 ain the fourth quarter.: G5 K& b$ i, C; Z
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,% f& T# a: L( Z% p5 ]7 H' E
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run1 K' S$ j9 s, h, o
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each3 W0 V; e/ f+ p a
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
: H" g U% u1 y2 Dvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
% d7 ~6 X- W+ v, ?4 Klong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
K9 W1 N/ I. H7 e* n% p) mregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 h0 x5 b5 y8 `' D9 q
of residential construction., C; n7 s# V) K! s% x# q& X6 {9 g/ v
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
& j! D+ c8 I/ {4 R“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction1 X% h: _9 r" V8 N+ Q
would have occurred if housing had been priced
' \2 @; b* h; z6 i6 ooptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this/ o' K3 j8 O# v* e2 K& b
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
; W4 ~$ a9 [! A0 w8 T. b! h5 \units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too/ G _# x2 d9 z5 q# N- l) b# U
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
; t. l+ B( D$ I5 }& T# K ]; CRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. O v' _- g' twhere housing demand will further contract under waning
, Z& b2 _; L, S* u7 Upopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are# d! p/ j' ]( _" e( T6 x3 z
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the5 C5 r f' P7 T4 I
very time that the resale market has swung into strong, k6 E' @5 R4 \/ `/ R+ m9 j
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces4 h% D+ _# V3 Y- z$ _) c* O
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural* k1 l* T8 T) H5 u6 L- `
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
- x! e+ y' ]* e/ g8 `+ hQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
" \% _& I0 `- estrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de f0 y) x' v4 I# q9 F4 Q% X% f
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,; ?: ?% e/ M, S* ~. C) d
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
- e0 V5 \7 x4 q$ nrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
" n/ ]% U6 ?! a4 a# U4 i" {cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears+ g: j. r8 h7 M
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
, G( r8 Z. C2 c" _! r# c1 Econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically2 X4 S/ s6 ^1 p! h) x* R
high levels of apartment-style units presently under7 |* \# s1 Z/ e# v
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
8 H, u: j' S! r( o Lreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as9 E9 W5 W' B6 g( h" z; Y
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
7 }3 e# r; i0 K0 V1 ~2 a3 |! vspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while- {& p7 L. B/ k! U
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
* V! i" y$ ^, _/ b# ~$ K7 manticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
8 i5 ~3 z$ G' B) Cinter-provincial and international migration over the coming: z9 G% m. @' M+ ]* t9 g! B
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
, @. P9 ~# k/ n+ L. e9 i8 i" {will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding. i3 j: q0 J* ~; v
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! D, i( f' S! z2 v( U9 i
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& n- d( ^% y9 P8 \2 e, c) \2 _3 s4 ?
Grant Bishop, Economist
9 g2 }$ h8 p2 ~: B& T416-982-8063
$ [5 z1 u! {1 Z4 s0 wPascal Gauthier, Economist
P' a# ?. \$ g, Y9 J: L3 D416-944-57300 a1 r" e, E- W O- Q
" k; O- _8 m% ~! @' o( f6 g8 thttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|