 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
5 v! R6 C u8 F- f6 LDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
- B6 f. y8 p V9 A7 F$ K3 B5 L% R: j' r; i2 v, D+ e( x5 K- P
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
; @( g( S& q$ ]# g3 u* E1 v* w' M: B' Y" _, [
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. " F* i- L6 i: ^( A
7 a1 C! L7 u* X5 qThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
: R% K l3 g0 v2 m+ J7 K5 T' s6 n2 [9 _- k
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer. o+ S' z: t/ U( ?* `% H
: w- K+ M+ E3 A7 r
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives. o( ]; A, e7 u+ t3 j+ @
! x" g% f9 O9 D& ~, _
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.& B! T1 t9 e+ m7 k8 W& E6 Q+ e
) j' G; G: ^1 N7 E* @- @2 M% L- p
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
5 F( H9 {3 R( l# ^( U& @4 h- c, O, \# v. T1 e
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.! Y. U5 z! s0 u4 Y, \; u, ^
% Q8 u3 c i) w0 [: U% W( ]) i( nDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|