 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员" E- S, I, F1 c" v
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs0 p* c6 [2 D( S0 n' z4 V
. {" ^# I3 \' Q# D q, f- Z* {EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
$ c, \# \$ J9 v, h! G& p" U& `$ P
& }- Q3 T3 J) i7 ~3 ~* ?, [Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
) x ]5 t$ t$ a* m, D' ^6 R0 W* N h% T" I7 \
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
3 k* I/ t8 K/ l6 Z
2 s& Y5 F& C5 ?9 y6 f& V5 ?Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.# m; [0 t* q7 N! g I
8 K; Q* L1 I, G" M4 gDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.8 e4 M4 w$ K( U n+ q' e; P
7 G" R/ `% X1 \) C
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.0 c. I, d5 f- ~4 x. @2 t" D
4 i8 u& O* b1 A3 N& u) w
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.( `) X: ]1 M$ w/ z7 i. z. I9 M z
) G8 Z# _1 h, @* j- t" JPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday./ y- n+ f' U% P
/ i; T! y# K2 A' i, J% o
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|