原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:' ]- t& [8 i8 A9 M& U) t
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.4 v! p( C1 V x* S
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. 8 s- i9 e( r2 x: V $ ~" |6 G! K6 T+ l上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. / H; P" U! b) h, G; v, P4 G 2 g. b/ S% p1 D" ]: H[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 # n+ V% H# `1 Y( t3 t6 J5 }" QThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" $ @2 j, s6 R1 m7 G4 b & V8 N: s% x2 s! a8 e9 U"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."/ F1 M9 K8 z+ D, ` ~$ t+ H! u
8 h5 ^/ c6 ?! ^5 N0 w
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。* ^9 q6 q3 Q2 [5 t/ Z. x. e
% U# `/ W% V$ i' ~- Y
# e) c2 z+ m6 {1 F8 R, i
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: : m. w! U8 w+ Z% M+ ^# MHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005# K) N3 ^4 z# z; s7 ?
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"( o& c: n" T( H: Z7 W. W: @
/ X5 F& Z3 j) _& z$ N9 Z' o) A
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: % X, O+ }* E1 g, T 2 e& j; Z; L; [) [Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.