警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。. e6 i9 ~/ O9 N. j2 d7 J$ r
+ R. x. @; ^+ E' A
开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 . _+ q- [* ~7 Y' |# b& }The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" $ E* J! N6 K8 U* E2 | + v3 G8 [# |* [% [# |8 e"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." x9 R$ T& J+ g4 c `; I+ m& a+ w0 P' j+ M, @- }: N
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 m; ^( o+ n2 b7 [/ @% s: q5 c- [7 T1 ^6 d
. X( O" }# X# Y3 v8 j
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: ; c- o6 B9 n5 b1 ~Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005. t7 l/ j6 ^; u) k7 ~
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb", d& H9 c: k7 _4 x$ W' P
; z' Z$ D8 j4 T4 C"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
/ S5 `6 T& h* }$ g( b6 hDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.