 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 & m# b7 H ]' |
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!% K# a! c# B0 v1 o
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ) x, s5 P* a2 a: {. s
3 Z0 [. Z8 V' ]& ~您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( b/ h5 x4 a/ p: K4 l
: @$ P6 ~7 u& H: B( `安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
8 t, _# l$ f# ~
& \; A2 s1 \: P$ X* w7 o; l不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
9 g8 n' q5 w5 U3 _# E" ~- t( S2 F# B0 o9 }1 y9 W, C
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 E! z9 P" B+ v9 i5 |! G
! x: I5 ~* P# s5 I( J
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
7 H: H: K7 ]4 G1 c1 F$ @Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers., d u) ]$ e! f
$ @# G* Z& ~$ O6 {6 ~
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
! [7 T- `8 \$ Y K
% s* {1 H* ]/ p0 T% ^% \But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 L) Z- }7 ^* c. I% a/ u
, y& N% |; m- W[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|