 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 3 O7 x( C ^7 T
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
/ A) k# Z! \5 `) D5 @. E9 Gcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
1 ^& O. S. F: U8 L. f6 l+ B; u* H" s; h9 k& J* e3 J. o
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。5 E& v/ K7 W9 u# Z/ J
& y( N6 C% Y1 b) T. [; |6 G) o安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.* X' }1 d' ]# ~ x: a
& r: e9 d, _) g0 i1 v1 g" T, H8 X
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?" t" e7 U" K/ Z5 R7 M$ g# F& J; g
' g6 i+ U0 H% o# h1 \% l
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 |( j$ Q' J& F- @- k; Z- t9 e+ M T% t: V- p! Y
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
6 ]9 q0 f5 [) V7 K7 Q# DYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
+ t I- e4 J! C# @! }( Y# ~" k* J6 m4 j8 e' ]4 z2 ~3 m
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
% ?3 g% A, Z5 _0 c0 f& {8 {
! X2 D& j3 b' f! F& b4 i0 FBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
1 ]- Q8 r0 ?: D& a6 m+ J# ~# O% G" ~6 U/ F: C* r
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|