 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
# \7 Q" f4 o% o5 y0 d( l7 Y; A楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! w8 E% |# G. |
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... $ j9 W( O- f$ j6 w
0 ]0 ~8 e2 {" N9 k6 O( U5 E, r' p您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。4 \: B( w3 y0 @. d- U! q
; {6 }3 G4 r' ^0 n5 l( U4 Y/ `安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 {. N5 m" C3 i8 P, ^) L5 |" `7 F9 K: y! D* G
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
0 \1 b; S+ ~% I. {+ J4 ~9 G+ n0 o+ n. r" i L0 ~
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。5 Z X0 H4 H" g/ i" t& L/ Q! m" t
, j& p+ ], {. `+ q1 |: ?7 Z$ C关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
6 b% q# \" [/ H& N' I% `6 L0 dYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
# n! s6 O$ J3 K
# H( @- P _- W7 W" {Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".% L0 `( K* `4 P* [+ Y) J
0 D K7 F/ M) ^$ }9 f3 s1 `% h: K
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
) Z3 e! v& K. v3 n9 f
( ]: h# O$ I% l7 l; t6 f6 C[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|