 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 5 ?% ^% P9 u% h2 c
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ ]1 x' e# a5 W7 w
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... . v+ W1 B4 x! c; Q+ i: Y+ o, T
7 k ], _; R4 n- @您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。/ p5 ]! T' ?" o9 K" o
# e- L9 x2 H; i R" d
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.; t: E$ c9 P& N4 Y1 {( t( f$ S
2 |- L5 b6 ~! @$ I3 w- ]
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?1 {6 O+ N6 K6 T! a
" R( ` B: S4 h/ I- Y( V& P
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。, \+ n# ^. w/ o5 G
1 `0 h. F4 R' T5 t
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
; }1 T+ t9 H( Z. {Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 f, ]8 m8 z. D
2 q; I+ [" x& G# aOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".6 k! H& E D. j1 Q0 u7 ]* o+ W7 |5 o
' p# U4 _; h7 o) x; n
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.9 S A% g+ z7 Z7 D9 K4 H. W
8 P9 r7 n* s, k* t L$ |' K[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|