 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
3 Q9 w* V) p7 q4 Y: ]" l楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!' i9 T4 e4 t- q% ]. F. ?/ [3 K" K
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 6 }8 S# P$ u" ?# M4 U
Z5 o" j! w* q u! U
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
* V0 K. l( j0 U6 t: j
" J' x1 ~4 h( ]5 f安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
* Y6 z$ g( A% v4 B+ I2 C$ X) J5 M& L- V& q: N0 O# f
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?- `6 d" W: s. b7 X
! z, L: q" r8 w6 B3 x! v' H. ^# K: e
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. S/ r5 W6 k7 Q# @
a! x% r& W) U( ~) R
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
+ d) W% `( Z6 U& E$ O- \8 q5 iYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.8 R) I% K2 |7 [; a- f
0 f) T, r9 U; y( a9 HOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".( b- }4 }& z7 {# ~+ @
$ t4 U9 I$ J! Q$ W! t: L6 w8 QBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.9 q" a1 b8 v4 @& J; ?8 {% ?
" \+ B! o X$ C& N' p! M' Z' _" n0 Z
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|