 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
; _/ m/ T( t7 _9 d' `$ U楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
8 g' P# [1 s: _( ~8 Dcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
/ X* E B& k+ l5 I; {- Z. C# U* E+ q1 r$ I" ?5 I% W3 f
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
. L! J$ K8 h0 _( T) @5 o1 v/ Z! Y2 B% Z t% [4 E F$ n9 N* q
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 |* Y3 B9 P' y$ r5 R+ c! ~8 M: e; Q: n
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?8 j# e# Y( R" r& r3 [* d
: N: A6 Z5 I$ ^3 V另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
+ _2 V9 y0 H! F* m5 }7 [2 u3 D2 ~/ B6 y2 ], _5 Z
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
_+ |5 }6 ~- ]- G" QYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers. z: T; r9 O( V5 v1 t! }4 a5 `
* C6 o8 K: O8 vOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
5 Q/ K5 w4 i$ y7 R6 M2 A" j" F8 G
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
( C6 i2 ~- U) b' j/ z
1 X1 Z' X4 u4 b4 ^[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|