 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
Q$ W4 r/ g8 Y, ?% k
" k) \% f! @/ J9 x诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
4 } \, L4 Y7 \阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
7 E9 m# H/ n% b2 P; s( s, p
' h3 B9 C7 P I( c# v- v c6 B) phttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse s! O# ]5 M& _! {
* h3 Q8 i8 Z! j3 F" n' J3 ]Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
) Y( b4 m U% _ f( g0 Q6 f9 r3 U5 U# ?, } c( L$ f$ W
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.$ W6 D' u- P+ X2 b- S+ U
' }4 z" Y. I$ f" w6 E+ f S" j
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
7 q ^, E1 s( a' u: a
9 W' P! S) ?4 {8 r) y9 e3 ZHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.4 ?7 _' I! N: Z
/ B2 O+ {+ N( l% z n. |6 A
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”4 B4 ?" w8 D. j( n: E; l8 R' R
% r$ T t8 U/ D N
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.$ }0 W' j1 `1 N+ I& i
+ `$ H: J, s) `! X$ \
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.; P4 D2 {% d |
' c1 O/ O: y/ E6 G* v
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.” Z* |) b( W: k# m# G- r. Y) @0 s' v
; F9 p1 ?2 ]9 a( h' c' IPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”% w+ Z M/ i* j$ p6 Z' F
" W+ q" y+ t% J4 p1 k
~0 \) R& C0 ?2 o: k4 p9 R3 c0 t
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
- Z1 h8 s0 s: {( A! s- u
# a, ?/ x# h) `2 E2 m/ IIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.0 R4 ]# ?3 D- S c9 \
% U& w& N* J8 V0 n: eNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.6 p1 ^/ t! M" ]+ s
, f; W9 P) u1 FGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.% g+ V" A- s$ s7 l5 g/ b, S
# H$ ~- t. e& J
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.; s# k7 y% @& |8 A( |
- C1 j' y. y) ?" q, I7 z
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
% i; K+ S; R* c5 N, G6 t; ]/ W# h. P3 r" c5 W- R
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
" x6 p4 z+ t% h+ K! V
2 d2 j- x" [8 n# U“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.. d/ _5 b! J6 x) E: w1 Z
( `/ T, D" L# f' ^
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.5 t( J8 `( X1 J5 N& U, h
$ H4 e+ @3 m& }
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
' v" j; N& q7 [$ ?9 Y) _7 P% Q/ o2 k- z5 d9 y: y+ c8 x; P
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 0 I0 D4 e& R- i6 F
