 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
' E( \ v! c9 f5 N8 |/ t
* {0 b9 ^) r) z1 V* N
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
9 h" o/ i7 N0 I/ d+ u V阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
4 c+ t6 j/ d6 n# \/ C1 {
5 x H- }, }0 W. l, Thttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse, L5 u# j5 P# y7 ]: r/ K s
! o9 z) u# k4 n; s
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse Z* [9 z( |3 q: e/ P
! A0 y- D- C6 A' q0 f3 _( |
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
& A+ v W) T! w' t5 Y% S) X
* N) m A% F& G: n5 Y: D/ wThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.; o' \! j% x% g* k7 k+ H
) ]# q; e4 @' I( \4 V
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
m# G+ P+ n! s. n2 m# j \. _. w { j! Q3 E5 b( T9 R6 ]7 ^; v
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”# m) h: m) A; W
( f; M* I( u* v x/ R* g; OActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.# I; O) D1 R6 Z" M" Q2 R
, X1 m8 n4 X9 t8 IBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.* {3 T. m) I1 D
/ L+ [1 E# ?% R( w) K
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”* e5 a( m. [4 f v
+ Z& @6 y+ a7 P( G7 ~3 j5 E( wPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
! o0 t+ J6 j) v8 N4 u* v
1 O. j- I6 r7 V, v
* g3 V5 F0 ]# J- A
: s5 z J- s' Q' r, a# dThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.4 A! f0 \$ g) r4 F& k( g8 X6 u* m
6 R* d( R4 s# k' F4 GIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
) x: L5 r, q% P" w0 i k/ l, ]# I2 n0 C% s# h& }6 ~4 {
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.; z+ ~6 w6 F6 K2 i H! R& M% T- F
5 A" L' `! {1 Z) S8 @- A/ F
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.; ~1 ~+ _1 R' p- D
- Y" o T$ J" N& J( u( F' H
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.& c' l% B* @3 G2 L6 ^2 L
$ j* o+ s8 j3 R* u& d3 u, cTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.$ q0 I$ @8 a& x% y, P$ }8 b2 A
% g. b. ?9 u( [. L0 mActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.; o e' L7 K+ D0 ^( @3 l* L
2 A- C6 |% Y5 g' [# q“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
y' E$ f( E4 a, |* L
( ~- u9 Y. e! y! L8 y: q“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
0 \: B' W7 @3 d4 C5 M" B$ | G8 u
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”, k4 c% G% r7 F- ]
8 S U5 l- W8 K* N' i% I+ y9 K
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 & L" G8 ^* @/ L" [2 d/ p
