 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
5 F2 b2 U% H- |1 U8 @
+ J4 L9 _+ Z y( t诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
, k1 |: _! w5 H; c; d阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。: Z5 S' ~, _# l: @
5 P2 d3 v3 h0 i3 c7 B1 jhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse, i( }! }) Q! w |2 S
- e1 A) h8 u- P: m* r( f9 fBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
# E5 n) Z5 v) ?: `% p, f
8 b) j0 Q B. C) vOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
* ^$ a9 ^ }' ~$ z5 H0 T: g- b& ]% K6 e% i+ |" X: P
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
, }8 Z$ B9 z v4 u8 E; m# b
/ K+ s) B3 \! l9 ^2 R7 @- ^He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns./ s& v7 g" F; h2 Z1 J; |" [
7 j+ j: ^. q' H0 ] ]
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”' G2 R& o/ W8 A9 y! U2 }$ J, o, l
% f! T+ g/ g* ?* V2 ]- E7 U+ YActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.( i& q% t+ c7 J4 E
5 Q" g. |! k+ j
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
. N4 E: i3 t) U% _' ?! Q+ Q. Q" c3 d. e: U7 q! g( g5 s
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
* V3 c9 Q; Z/ f9 S4 n- u
) T3 o2 y- z5 mPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
2 k, G" i4 @: g9 v: M
; y( c* D/ u; R; L0 k# t4 T" i * h6 S' a! U7 b3 C z/ T
. Y r7 ^ h" P' hThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
% G7 p0 C/ X, y! h5 t- N! V3 K. e; B1 I2 g
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
$ y3 ~3 ?- R+ {* x# ^" b* N, W; l1 \6 X0 V
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
+ B8 V4 |' g( s5 G7 ?) U0 L1 W) x2 Y% z5 s, U
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
" w$ N) E l8 e, W8 Z' S( @3 g$ g. `& s5 L: _6 d7 ^3 w6 a c6 y
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
$ F) l4 ]6 D- N& M3 a# {4 s
- {( K* }3 R% HTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.0 J* h7 \; k2 [; k
& W& `8 P/ ]9 j) d4 pActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.6 w4 X% p" O3 s7 `. N
9 b$ o2 q- P' o“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.) ]" O6 K3 t- a4 u5 e
- z. P' _1 ^! {; F0 e2 \+ n
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.8 u, q# G/ x- y! Z! P% ^
0 p O- t' s+ d( k! B
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”$ H* Z! I, w% d" u8 g" i
. T; b; K0 ^- S( w! u/ i
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ' ?, a# H4 g& C) \7 i9 w
