 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& o) \3 l7 t. K8 b8 X8 ^
, o, T: r2 V3 U2 Y: q% g诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
* ?. w4 Y f5 T阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
, e8 p+ _0 x" k4 n& J8 _/ V0 i7 |3 Y* Q$ c/ M8 v# u: ~
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse/ U o& ?5 @3 \# {+ w
: w1 y1 w% D: q$ \' x0 f
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
& ]% k6 i+ H* L8 [0 G+ l3 U
2 k) u5 A7 i* S% KOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.; S# R/ x# K/ I' `! b4 _) f4 k$ n
$ I' |2 R7 s1 `/ _, h6 Q. MThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.% E2 G6 h- W$ i6 I8 J
/ |% P) H! m$ T7 s. N: @ hHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.9 w/ L- f6 C1 r9 Z+ Z& i- O
3 t( @" k; U& B& R2 tAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”) A$ {$ t, m. a
4 t' \4 r& f$ K0 _7 TActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work. W% x, L8 t. I; }% r+ E) `: u
; ]8 i" b! x p" p r2 UBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems." E+ E, t6 S, M$ F- P7 T
+ j+ E: u3 V% X4 `( @ o
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”5 | M# R- u% K; F" y
$ t& `+ D0 h& u, D( M
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
3 H; _' L; W- L+ e$ T$ d/ M& U' i# ^1 L: A! R3 g3 c
* J, h0 l( G8 x1 h8 \$ e1 J+ J& w7 W" s5 F
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.) o# T0 `9 h& I0 V$ w5 c) Q! p' ]
]: A. C. j0 X6 L* M8 ?It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction." {2 A/ k: E5 x; O0 \; `
- T# o3 T1 ]3 jNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
' B8 i" p! k9 R" C. F$ L
5 K9 g/ I( W" |, N$ h! KGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
0 a2 R" K) [# T3 A/ D$ Y! S3 |- _7 i* b6 ^: j8 ?2 O' I& ^" T8 M
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.; x: e. [. V# D8 y2 r. l
% q0 H1 J. i2 Q6 y
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.0 }8 M/ T& w. c$ \
* {2 X- E; r4 A, s" w$ W" M
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
( e2 c- }( g2 b
% T" |2 G7 A. A+ y/ W6 ^. K“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.% a# W# Q& s) [0 q# @) p, V' W
1 p1 J- j$ b- |1 k- ~“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
+ ~$ h( m1 m: ~$ W* b
6 k1 F; L* j" F) r% Z2 l( F“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
2 a3 _$ O7 J- W3 X3 m4 o: b& G o5 u. n3 H" [
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
