Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
" n; V" ~5 s9 o. ^! }3 |1 @  M8 C
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
# i( `7 J+ s/ Z+ @8 y& M: D
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
0 T0 U. y* x; ]% s5 r
$ C* g$ x2 w& g  U. `
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
  H2 N2 x+ |! F, JSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
  g% Y# O/ H) P: ^0 l% ~5 S0 VNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
, y' F. w9 f- }; B/ d. |You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
7 S) o$ Z* Q9 m* {! p
# D+ M1 d* G# Z& L% K& TIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
! }! Q6 W. G+ ]! U8 V" r
6 X* `3 F) c% ~& XIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
  q0 Z- `; h5 u3 q4 M) `
; h' }+ z4 l& R4 L Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
+ O+ L' e( c# k2 p& ^: [San Diego  22.8 29.7
! I3 z& A) G* A: gSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
7 ^( I& \: ?+ |* bLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
2 R" R4 l0 k0 _' d) a8 [2 G& \5 {! GSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
$ A( ?6 p! z" h7 A) WNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
/ Y( a, U0 ~3 j$ \* @  nWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
* ]8 E, k1 X/ _5 }4 b
( k/ E+ a% U% a) O# M* k* s* M

9 q$ u, U# S( z# sIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


- I/ H) w) C" h) z1 c  u: dFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

4 h" ]4 l0 n; v4 \it would be a good reference.
4 c- H) d( E( {; W- \! _
+ w" Q1 ]' [* A0 I$ dthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
$ |+ ?/ m) C" O# y
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]