Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
) v, Y; O3 U0 A# M
+ L1 P$ F3 j( Y9 U( ]* OLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

' Z  D; f" Q' B& O7 R, p3 uTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

* s7 X  y7 A$ t" v* H
# o2 y# i2 G% J" f4 ~4 a. |' k, c. |In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
1 [3 W+ c# }9 a5 w- b' L  @# QYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
8 l- n/ e3 r* X3 U: N
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
5 @0 F% a  J- {
1 f3 Z+ x! D' b; n8 X( o5 y" m8 v Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
- V! G  r/ ]+ m! M! [ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
4 `8 M$ h  D& Y$ |" t& E& t0 YSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
6 ~$ e6 v9 B; s: bLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
% @  a5 [  B, j, g+ y# ASeattle  20.4 25
! k4 R, u1 N  J7 u$ `6 L7 M! }+ k" A# @Denver  17.7 23.7
" p9 S6 N1 F* x2 H# ]( X" ^6 e0 WNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
/ d! n7 t, ~3 aWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
' ~/ h" `- A% @, e, C3 T: }2 z
7 G+ f, Z9 C* f

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
' b, ?# i% f7 x. G5 V7 |; ?

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
4 B" x& L: A, v( s) N
5 x+ L3 m2 t2 N; K! n5 Q! P8 D+ ^it would be a good reference.
$ K7 u! j% [4 R3 }+ u
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
: T- m" N2 G2 B5 s2 [( W/ {! _
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]