Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
& `" b* W& h0 B/ f" w: l- PLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
! N4 k. I' m7 x, a6 F. j$ I
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

" g# b$ I: l1 P; G$ }4 C8 bTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
3 X% G4 P0 O* L2 B

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
" z2 o7 `# M2 ]
  q* t4 H, x% N7 M( CSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
2 P; q$ a) N# O6 x9 z/ Z" I9 D( I- n
2 c- `8 P8 O1 a. AIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

7 s6 D) P, ]; j2 c5 ]8 l$ DIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
! U# y8 p* K/ U) f5 w
% T6 g" ?9 h6 s0 \! W Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
5 T5 j% U6 K6 W3 K" g0 l1 E% pBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
0 V% z# S9 _  SChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

4 @' L0 i0 s- ]6 w1 m5 r+ z

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

' C9 E% w0 ]3 n3 _2 v% M
) w& w. J" K* Z7 e% OFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
% s5 \! ^9 I2 `4 |7 X9 |
it would be a good reference.
1 N1 O8 N8 R- f( f  ]# r3 C9 Q3 c6 q
% E' g. [- t, bthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

* N6 H# t) a1 o; D  _* G[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]