Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
" I& x4 W, ^1 G" V& v
( B# ?, x- g" }Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
6 H4 v9 s$ f) j4 h5 s
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
0 G, n1 z& Q6 \; ~
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
) c! B: s. G1 n
' q: u% S  X/ H6 m2 b) Y# BIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

( s, ?5 K# q& `+ o6 C Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
' R! b7 q3 g2 i6 V: M Avg. 1988-2000 2001
* ]) O* ^' [0 ~+ Y( H# n( EBoston  20.5 30.2
! t4 ^- W; ]1 `. j: p1 c: O# ySan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
  T' y: a; Y. ~7 K3 D" v. n8 O% xLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
1 J# E/ q( J: ]& f$ qSeattle  20.4 25
# X3 v9 q$ [9 c# U0 k( DDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
) ~$ U  ~' m1 L8 P2 ?Chicago  17.2 20.8
1 x; Q* z# C, [) z0 EWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

* N, R* a/ W3 c0 D% f1 z. R7 x% \; J2 s
' p( f/ c6 U5 F* x5 R4 L
; m- d, R0 Q. K) m$ lIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

7 q( F  \3 S5 E+ ?3 r* i
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
3 V7 g/ R+ S3 f! U
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

" G$ i5 C& F, R" C" l- U- D[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]