 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
7 ?8 Y; K9 Z4 y6 Q Y' g) z# q& p8 R
+ T3 @) I1 W/ X" n
. ?! P2 J! D6 K! J2 S. _If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
$ \3 _; @ o5 o! a; {/ u8 W- Y& S5 ~6 F7 ~3 w
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03' t8 A4 D) ?) P Z( S' Q& l
) P5 @5 C: ^# F8 Q w3 F8 M2 p2 {/ l
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
0 G& i, A V0 Z! o( y! V2 K* B0 T3 { t3 n. e: o
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) % E$ T9 F( Q. r, F% q8 n& M! f
|
|