 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
# h$ c# U0 t1 i H4 ^8 S: g4 I
5 y3 D$ r& z& t q- K1 L: {% _0 K$ [& y2 q/ H; N+ n6 ~" o0 \
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 9 s/ t4 s- ]6 S
$ T5 H# }+ R2 x$ {6 M* S1 P: k( E
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
# |9 O% }/ s) }, M- M$ C+ S9 c
3 x& a! X; m( N* G/ w6 Ecomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..: {, k' _0 t9 Z+ d' T) x: I* k
9 S& L" _$ U3 }# E! _8 J
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) $ R; v; j) u* C
|
|