 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 4 ~$ f4 t. `* }/ L" R, y$ i
8 D( _( P& S) \6 h
) T0 F1 G/ X6 z8 f' g) n" ]# w" P你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:7 P! Z8 s0 s: p& f9 E* _
Ralph Klein
+ ~' ^% C7 u- ~1 K+ l
" G* D' w1 r6 |, m" \我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
$ V: r0 |* v1 v! R4 E. t9 m" `$ ^
+ R" L0 O, d6 ~& H9 ]* D所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
5 K5 [; Z! x; |" G1 U7 W: ]' J9 h) r' M# N
$ D# V# [+ i2 R* L
; c/ J5 s& F, G4 ^5 Z; zhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades& l: A9 P! @" S, G8 H$ b+ Z$ c
Historic Alberta budget balances:' [3 d: Q. B+ j0 w+ t! g+ e) s
6 x: e6 H( F5 q* ^1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus) E6 R2 @1 k' x e
2 m4 ~/ T: f+ x2 z1982-83: $796 million deficit
; h4 C, B4 t' I# @0 R
7 D! I9 D2 C6 @% h% G& L1983-84: $129 million surplus
6 \8 i$ }4 ~) m; Q; ^
3 c$ f% `' o0 N/ Y2 Q' Z1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
: N! i! V( v5 X: f0 @
: Z# H* j3 Z4 O. n; M% w1985-86: $761 million deficit& F6 b' X+ z8 K' E& W
4 P) I" {' e; m. _* K1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
F, v3 b8 X6 p+ F( v8 M5 V. r7 \$ j# Q0 n1 {* v
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit- h$ ^3 S A3 p% \2 |) X% ]- _
: f" y$ Z7 s" d1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit/ n7 L1 ]3 n' z. P
% \" a+ \8 i2 u; c; o1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
& E J* L% Y' r) ?3 W% M) q& l/ ]5 e! Z6 Z# N: ?3 S
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit" M) [# r! S N0 n, Y9 F
2 j: N; P! n# g( t' k/ o
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit0 a& u! k, Y1 b! e: W- D9 J
: K7 f+ m8 J/ e Y1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit. M8 Q$ d% h5 s3 c1 g" `
1 d4 j& i( d$ J' c
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
7 F" \6 J2 q0 p5 p, j$ x. V$ L$ l
' ?5 [# P: K( v2 p8 ?, M1994-95: $938 million surplus) E# o8 T3 Q5 {1 W: ]7 ` N
% d+ m- h" z; r
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
- ]. \! M: c5 o7 y5 f% ^/ }" ~# j F8 J
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
+ O' x1 _' g. j/ F: B1 A; Z! ^1 o6 h$ k( E. E
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus! r$ Q( j: ]5 n) U6 r. i9 Z+ U
9 ~# f- J2 N/ @" F2 i0 e
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus1 W& r% g" j: W( [* n7 b4 H* B
" d) N0 X+ O2 |3 Z7 H N$ L
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
, r2 k7 d/ p0 Z# a& b
. U5 r) X$ h$ \9 o( t2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
! S. j, p. Y9 x' k4 r- O K% N
+ J3 }% f L2 w8 R( x# F9 g2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus% ]+ F' e6 F* D* T/ W) s& o
4 E* @/ t1 Z% x7 x+ r
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
. }2 k0 r( j' E; c; U5 ?0 J. Y6 a# I* I
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
2 o2 ~& H7 S6 G0 @2 |+ t4 W% W! q0 T/ b: `4 R/ K
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus( U* T% m" r$ B
: C3 P& x" _# H. R. r5 {, ?% }5 b
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
1 A; Q9 t- r4 ?7 I
{ R: ~$ i2 T; y! t& E2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus6 a- ?* I. I- q
* y, Q; i' x2 B5 Z2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus6 k+ j* e( W, Z- Z' s+ u, F& v
" S5 ]$ l. |! w
2008-09: $852 million deficit7 u( ?- i. y1 n- w
2 N* j3 K+ O, X9 L4 U
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
" j! u0 d( b# A9 l# l5 U) d* c# E6 S; ^
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit/ V6 m0 w9 \7 ~6 B8 f
0 b( L/ t9 r0 s# T0 m3 t& r2011-12: $23 million deficit1 R! D$ D& ~, H+ J3 E* P
3 Q5 W* A8 I5 x7 f; G" |( Y2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit! I7 }, Z5 G1 A
y# h" C# i* @2 t& c8 P5 b9 q/ [+ U2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|