 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
# H# M+ |3 X: j, E- b) m7 ^0 I- ]
5 d2 i% z8 y8 E7 a( j L9 }# D
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:; ^2 \! r$ }# C* T% {
Ralph Klein l/ u# X# c$ C- e7 |, M D
Q& K5 i- {3 k; P' R5 m
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
6 `, j. W0 k0 g% ]$ f6 j6 }
2 F8 D4 X- X& T3 u% J7 N4 R所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。! ]# B+ W9 {1 \. O9 S) z
; N' o" |) J# B" E7 g8 ~3 o8 w2 f
. f9 g$ L4 c* |! G1 W9 F
' P" r2 I/ w$ n# ^http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
' s6 A1 D6 c) T* U- E8 NHistoric Alberta budget balances:' ~7 r- \) a. `. P8 b
) Y( q r- q" V9 S* C1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
* M5 I+ k7 b, N' K
9 H$ p: ~ M# l8 W; t% Z) I' X1982-83: $796 million deficit- Y2 {7 W! z1 ^+ R+ t- ? U
. m; B6 \7 n1 @, u) z+ ^
1983-84: $129 million surplus
1 F: x7 G1 ]" H4 h1 s Y4 I: N$ K1 i* p/ c; ]
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
1 @, Q4 u9 l; u9 _# T
! }9 P/ c8 e+ J, A( o1985-86: $761 million deficit1 Z% k# ?- N9 ^1 D! I
) {5 b, N* h0 N. d
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
* P4 ~5 O0 L- k0 Q6 b! X5 n, N2 S. }+ E1 ^. t
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit" I8 L5 U8 Y# v+ S
4 M0 }, R, E4 R5 i' U' c1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit8 z, w- M! H- d, ?
- a' Z0 C" |$ m/ n, |. v5 L+ x
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
1 N; p5 O# n2 o* |2 {
5 m$ r1 d# Q C; K) z1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit. |0 G7 Q) h% W/ \2 ]
' x3 i2 ?7 h4 W3 ?
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit$ z5 k3 N3 V3 b9 D& a4 n& ], D
3 J/ A- ~3 a; I( |9 y3 k$ L$ t1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit! I2 I5 @: |) @$ U
! e5 i" j9 R! `4 {( e1 Y
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit9 ^4 z i9 D2 L2 k M
9 h8 g+ U) Z3 k
1994-95: $938 million surplus
|$ M& ^) z0 ^3 i! m" c
u: o2 i" j F' M1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus9 J0 f, W; d* \, r, X! Y
* D. Q9 j0 l1 Q# I2 G {# K8 x/ l1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus" f: B: X* _# s& K
v2 m( Q. E$ a/ p4 j! d6 S6 a4 }1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus: V0 w, _& n! d! J- D) t: T. R
; ?1 I9 o n! t4 r. e1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus2 h, W, z5 _8 J
& Z7 X. L0 L+ L. ^1 w1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus5 G5 h( ~0 z" V, M
7 x3 u0 y1 U1 {# M* n2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus/ F0 O V5 R( B! u6 l
6 u j Z7 [7 c- [/ T: i7 {2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
+ m7 n8 A: V! F
: z) p7 u5 m% s$ V2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
- s( f& i& Q/ T+ L N$ z, D" [* w. S. j2 N5 K7 ~% {, o( c
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
0 e7 l8 B# `2 }9 n! [! X! n2 }7 ]
( u0 M; W4 F l' Q# X2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus* O, ^5 Y: s: C8 K! s5 Y4 Z9 x
- W9 f, u; E3 o8 ~. _5 i2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
6 r! c& j3 [; t" s `# U+ q1 S
8 H& W3 j+ q& j8 K) d! b2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus& _! f) U, \4 G* N5 L
# q7 Z# g1 r% O6 Y
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus9 y8 z7 n9 J' ^
7 U g; Q- `, g! i2008-09: $852 million deficit
/ \' [8 L2 }$ K( s/ x
& L% G7 ~$ t# R9 `3 b# w2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit( Z4 w( _; s8 [$ V
' ^4 l; l% f0 e* `7 A, v
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
$ r7 _ @2 }6 J% C- H- B( I3 T* h: v; f1 [/ N# F
2011-12: $23 million deficit9 ^6 f1 z1 e& X _- o5 W; F' t
# e1 Z9 M# F5 G3 @* ] O
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit: t2 S) R% T& F
' @+ H( C# l+ N* r3 _# H
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|