 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
) e- S/ P9 l9 S. V: A4 n$ o
% ~* ~' k6 S4 |5 U( ]2 B- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 Q$ u3 c6 @3 k$ |& u1 ^9 y( j
) k6 [6 i5 C0 H0 G' S
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market) v h I" _5 r! L4 v
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third- r0 Q. R& D0 H" Z& g
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) Z4 c$ y" Y6 F+ Q- g& Ein the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# d6 ^6 j ]8 m' Oprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 ^. ^' [' L- C% H6 h3 ]: jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 p/ p6 ?0 t! f b! S; P& |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal( c" E y; y8 s' ^
LePage Real Estate Services.
7 b9 f, q* N6 @9 M4 G! {. A1 T/ X; i9 k; z' R" H* o9 L8 l) C
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 J1 O' i1 F( {& o: Ware forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic8 I* ~. y0 B+ _- ^+ x4 V: \
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and+ Q' e4 y9 {6 E8 _
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
2 ~! Z6 n, G+ Z. w" U k1 W( z1 u% Wresidential real estate sector.
% E% C* G4 S& `% \ O# w- x) }3 l! L- R+ y, y% C
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
+ S9 N& ]0 S1 @occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); U2 `# F0 J; K# H
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- T* m$ {5 r% z3 z+ D( f
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 M. g) e6 S0 s, V(+13.2%).
4 t B, c0 I3 i- Y5 v
- R f3 ]" [6 q; x& a9 L "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 [$ ?+ a9 l4 h
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 q7 z9 b @- i6 ?
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
% j, U& T% r G. Ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' b# V, \' ]" [- U" i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: ~' `" H8 G. b2 y- b: ^"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! e% K( a, ?( G5 E% s5 F1 d
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy6 k& G! e# b) Y& Z" o$ F3 i4 f
balanced market."
; t& }, i$ c& l" Q4 Z- n
0 n. y. K4 l* y* }/ b Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: P/ e [: ?5 V3 o. I
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
6 _/ u3 [: I8 h# D6 X. a/ {to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( v6 i4 f& u2 j8 L4 W, P
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
- l% W- s0 Y, n9 @0 u T) n) T2 xenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 l, G- O: E" D7 u: Zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) t4 r# v! R. ]" Vbreaking price appreciations.6 Q: i0 B4 i9 t6 t
6 L" }% y! U/ O' z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 b1 H8 `/ r) \8 |economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( _4 Y4 _" Q% M1 E4 M- m$ {7 G
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
+ |& ^. z+ y1 @7 c' v
" ~$ q5 K% K" Y6 t8 ^& j1 Q- v In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 ?/ M. t8 x7 O% |& P# B8 Reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer$ _5 L! A; H" b# B) |
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
; q9 y: z% D* _% ~' islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
t. G4 N; ^$ VIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 h7 i' K& r6 f0 N$ a: Z: Hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ T! f! _+ U5 c9 a8 Mprice appreciation when compared with 2005. P3 ]0 G- H$ B
; t( O* I% I7 }" O3 t o+ r8 h$ b, R
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
9 N X4 z1 P: j1 U- xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 l' l! C% q+ Y+ l x
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada$ O1 t+ K( O2 K, A/ ^$ c5 N
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 T- j( p- a7 K$ x: S; k+ C3 B+ c1 W7 J6 q( {3 D
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& s2 i1 M, n5 c7 ^) EAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 L3 K7 {, c8 [, K% d# Wfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( Q$ r& p6 _- l" Drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general+ _/ M/ M; u5 n; S8 l- e+ G, M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% T1 p V ? w wdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 K( Y" K+ _2 I7 X3 o: P) H
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! q5 C3 g7 a9 I1 Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ B& W8 b1 e# T- m4 K
0 z7 S4 f6 Z' [8 f& k
<<
( H$ _8 I5 M5 m# O, y+ m* h REGIONAL SUMMARIES
( q$ K1 ?9 F* l, X* N0 V. t >>
$ c8 w- W, ]; u+ D3 B7 f$ g
/ ?' }. w J; v6 t6 Z5 a, ^ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# [7 U7 y: n9 p& [+ n0 j9 ^! JHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
: t* |% N! E; I% `of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time a% @- G2 {3 ?! I- `* c0 Y* g
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& ]% l7 d$ M% c9 A0 z8 w6 [! l# Q. r. |
renovations.
8 x* s1 t+ ] x% \ E9 x
0 g8 p2 @+ E3 s, i7 D6 k) t The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' M, f0 H" }. d$ B- O, ^increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' N- j B1 v" p+ m0 Y# ?% x/ J* \
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and" |8 X# z# } [+ u" }# @' I
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. I+ R) s" L% G5 S5 ~) n! D8 g* ]0 Y
) E; h# |" _. I& y( U5 M; u The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 v4 ~7 U) Q4 b2 w4 V6 l( G( I9 sslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ E8 S7 r' @& N0 p. }5 A
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ z+ O/ _' c! U" k% n4 x6 J
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 r% C* ?6 F8 p, x/ o C5 |' a- sto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 l& ^# i7 x7 Z" m+ m" @& q
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.6 H7 Q4 v% I$ }) j- ~6 f) C
, f1 w& }: R5 Z! ?% x3 a In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
W. U2 B+ w |# J7 `conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! ~" Q! x( l- @8 Z3 Z3 T" B+ Hhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" e- W: J% b0 _: ^( f3 Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian* I% t- E6 i1 x9 {3 `
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; z3 O& m% \5 x( ]- l" wbuyers with more options when looking for a home.' D9 ?) m7 ^% X: i: a
. N% h- X! r8 J" ?/ D7 @, F# b) ^3 a. u+ j
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; e6 |3 a0 { s H6 v8 |% \' n% j& B7 p( I
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
+ r# M0 X# Y# j- u6 `' Hpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
6 ]" R* E3 P* R c" _& Pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, h6 C: f% I: Afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.( u7 }2 O ?& e/ Z
: B r, I. T4 `& b$ t: K" q: h Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house6 [7 M8 B! Y, e
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory, X% _6 {- g( U; f: \# x5 ^
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
9 p# ?) ?8 I5 }9 `first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 s, Q7 s0 b3 L9 Y. D
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- }& f8 \2 q! }4 s9 ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( i6 n- P$ G' `1 emaking a purchase. ?2 x0 z P- o' n7 `
! f6 g' Y" O0 X( v5 w9 l
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* m3 o& W/ y/ ]5 C
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
+ ?+ M5 ~/ m9 `- Econfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
1 X8 h# H+ h3 r7 d& o1 a+ \centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting1 I: R# S4 I! P" }
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown2 B W" f$ E) i8 X% W9 g9 g
amenities.
- W- t) O" J9 q: G! G3 `% T
/ M7 \4 e% i" O( t2 h The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels: V& Z* Y7 T9 M2 G: v% t+ I+ c7 q4 r
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: u: R$ X/ a! N$ t E9 n( g- M
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has1 M0 T1 a2 }3 X3 Z( P/ L
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( e' R. q- ~. _* Y1 y+ Q& {driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 t8 I; l. d E- p
residence, rather than for investment.
8 ?! O7 B; n8 D5 e& I
2 X1 ?4 f% O2 j7 V! }+ O The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
3 o9 m3 m2 B* ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted' E" P- E1 Q( p% `" Z+ l
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer e, n. ?. M" t- \7 s1 d2 o
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization |" ^2 c/ \6 p, H( U+ m8 }
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( K1 N& `1 S* ~7 o; i |; s
the market.
4 @$ o: }. U) Q3 S$ k, A4 z4 V0 d- q% v* A" K
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 I6 n: h6 x" oJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ }$ y' d) O) m1 U% r) OAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
v5 V2 R5 _4 M# A. S$ j! I% ~months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 ?+ f7 Z2 |7 D1 Z$ eto the shortage of available inventory.
2 g0 u/ q# A3 T8 w
7 I& n$ J$ _9 [" |7 z/ |7 z Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 B, s1 Q% w! g: Amomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 D) v% n, C Z0 f& Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 J. | ]; B; }1 m" A
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% S# P3 ?+ I u, I% p
6 B) Z. u4 @, D& i0 X* k
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases5 s% D: S8 w& @' G9 p! x
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 H% K, P. X2 Q, Z% vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 G" T0 @7 @0 \& {
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 w7 a! p2 L& I6 J
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
" }0 P0 K% i, Nseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ }1 W a: u9 ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.& Q8 \- O* L, D F; o
6 X& }, c6 T1 {4 C. T; H
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 R/ o/ g+ r" e9 qas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
- n5 B- R6 \8 ~remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
1 s. _8 U5 S) n% @/ S ^& q `/ @+ zmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. V! H9 B: B0 C; J3 l. ~
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! K0 ~# z7 D8 J! N
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly0 R) ?% o2 {+ E# s: ?2 G" Q7 W
towards the end of 2006. H: ]. B# H B; F7 e, l9 \5 ^3 R$ a; t
) x6 \/ e7 C* O# c( t! f
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of$ E8 u. V! f& M9 G5 B
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, k- P+ H( Z3 ]5 g0 fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 v2 a$ h. U" o4 Ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
% I* }6 w4 E$ ]9 b+ p Lforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added5 i E! O1 z! [, V4 m
pressure on tight inventory levels.
Q" W2 j) L# [9 ]4 v4 {7 B
' s J3 ^; G" W1 G- B/ ?( X Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% _& K' M; A6 p2 F" p3 E& E
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ p: A) L6 n9 B) zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! C: l, M) } q7 \5 u, Cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 M, c4 q6 b$ n- j2 h0 x8 @for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., y' P! [) }, y& y. R6 S
, C( @8 y) `8 j; X
<<
3 q6 [( S7 s8 U3 e6 P+ x0 e' N Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% J: C) _/ _/ B1 z- ~' d9 R( b
: w6 N+ i! e8 c* k& X) o" D2 ]7 N( h% X7 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 q$ x! d# K8 {8 ~5 j Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey( F$ h/ l3 d' ?3 X2 @ \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% @5 P! c" }) |+ q0 O3 {
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
# [ B$ C3 E) [: J Y8 e Market Average Average % Change Average Average
. I9 e' ?9 C$ s0 o4 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------) r6 N% y! r* s+ g& c6 ]
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000% Q2 q) [2 s) O! l) M2 C3 p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, T4 M0 C2 c X5 Q' z5 E6 r: {2 v
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000$ `- A# k r: \ l0 ~$ ]& o5 [; ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
n. `1 _% b$ u Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000) d& N5 Q: Z6 Y; H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 \+ U; Q# e/ M' m9 T/ u
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -+ s2 N! _3 f2 A& f% ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 g: I" w% w2 H3 k P/ K
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
' w9 ?9 ~7 B8 j- T' w0 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------& V) y/ M ` B8 R7 F; N8 m( B
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
7 y& T3 b3 h$ ~6 I9 w3 Y# |) R -------------------------------------------------------------------------) D9 R" m$ M _8 N& H
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185+ s1 ]( P7 r9 u* r% U. F; z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 h- Z$ j1 k$ h5 U Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
) q y6 [7 R4 ? Z& ~9 E; A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. {# i9 z- h5 N$ ]4 n
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
. Q0 H3 L6 Q @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A8 R0 v5 M" d; V Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
) q) G; X) _, O& @- A" X -------------------------------------------------------------------------" e5 ?( X9 |* L6 h3 b; C x0 B: H
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500; K: d U( A! v4 d/ W/ b2 K. `5 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 G# }; E0 U! F+ A b6 R% I; W
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* H1 h; B' m. ?8 _- J9 {/ ?( x8 R8 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. p/ S* U2 a$ Y8 _& s$ i Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
- Z5 F& P) b" p3 d/ v1 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. z/ L7 m8 W" T0 O. s. f Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
: T/ T7 v2 T# l/ X- X -------------------------------------------------------------------------' t1 p) S {8 U* e" Z* A7 G
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0002 |6 D0 n# y1 i% f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 c. O3 R$ z/ P: O
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
% A& u+ \; S* B0 Y3 k% j -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 t% b+ B/ j, T$ t
5 s4 w/ R3 t; [) b7 j+ ]1 N% G1 \
-------------------------------------------------------------( [, ^/ E6 }8 Z; g' @
Standard Condominium
2 K9 ?( b; B& X; _+ z- s& T2 f -------------------------------------------------------------
: T% o* | x, n$ D9 Z: q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo; g8 F+ d! h; x2 V) M, I% e
Market % Change Average Average % Change
( h0 }% \2 `) d/ N2 R! B. T -------------------------------------------------------------2 O% J: o0 g) x4 F$ z
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
1 ^! F+ M* c- Z8 B ------------------------------------------------------------- g% S# e( J+ M. O
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%5 ?; b3 {& M8 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 @+ S9 y. `; U. `( A! _! J( W3 N Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
0 P% ]& h" Z+ y% Q& \ -------------------------------------------------------------% I4 M3 r6 ?- [. e* ^. `" E, g* R
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ D3 c4 I3 m2 @# q
-------------------------------------------------------------
) k7 t8 C+ W! q St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
! F! V; B8 N' R -------------------------------------------------------------
( ~0 h/ r! A# N% X& W Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4% V% V, H! h3 u" r5 }0 R" R
-------------------------------------------------------------6 q/ u+ A7 T6 X
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' v6 c* w1 G5 Y A, _' H
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 M. m$ I) K( c Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%6 p. I3 M$ }' ^; d1 ]; v4 V- @
-------------------------------------------------------------8 q5 Z" h5 H; V) q3 d: W
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
( L5 U' G5 V. I$ _ -------------------------------------------------------------1 [& u5 G' U& \0 U/ S5 E, b
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%1 V) E/ B8 T% b0 c: W( \ p; V
-------------------------------------------------------------6 S) M/ C ?) m8 a9 P8 ?
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%$ K" \# H( ]" @" T. Q, I
-------------------------------------------------------------$ r" Q* M1 v% n! q. E
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%2 E9 [4 a" Q7 @' F
-------------------------------------------------------------& V8 P5 ]5 [% q+ S) j
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%3 a1 k7 E1 l2 z! b s/ r
-------------------------------------------------------------6 e: b- V, e) P! L
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%# x, H: \ L6 E& k
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 \0 c! ?* v' N3 ~5 P# j Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%' S4 H* q$ n" @% Q, }
-------------------------------------------------------------% j I9 z. [2 ~
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
: g! Q% ^* L, g. M- n! s5 X, K -------------------------------------------------------------( _; U/ \* H) B9 \% N% l; M
>>
1 t* q. ^7 G- k$ o8 v3 K1 K7 ]4 Q
, B# r+ [9 B7 B; K2 t. \ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
2 X' v/ s( l( m: P. cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
+ X) x6 [; ?) [+ ?0 D7 pJohn and Victoria.. r, n2 I8 z+ W5 b4 B
, i \ G, {# s% }
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
1 E( a) x N9 l" ?# O: Vcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of4 P; _) c$ @* R- O$ I
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release2 K4 B- h3 m9 w5 U9 i) @: z6 I# R6 A4 F
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, a2 K' t) \) X% ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
3 Y. v# V8 v( n7 W5 |9 L- cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 z: |3 r2 M4 B) @2 Q# H5 Y) T
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- @8 ?# ]& p; e6 b5 j, Y# H) F9 Z" k$ M
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- Y6 U9 s9 y4 iversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on7 R ~; k1 O! v0 W4 K
November 15, 2006.# A/ l7 n* M3 ^/ e- ?
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; C3 @; c L# ~5 E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 q z6 Q$ z. K& F
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
+ |8 W4 _# ?! F& havailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|