 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
+ S# K) X+ }6 |; V/ r" o% o/ P
9 C1 F! d7 B m# T& z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 Q3 j4 G' Y, l2 ~ u
& Y& O: P& O1 L% I3 ? X, }4 z7 N2 j
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: A3 x: K" }7 |$ d } texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 M. I) v; ^$ h
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ y8 a% r" i2 e( J4 V* I) ], x
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- d" U( Y. m5 S; Z" D- b, M
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 {- H( v$ C5 Ymore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,4 `, |2 p) c3 z* K! [7 y6 t+ [& Z/ i
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" k3 L) r% ^ ?6 p6 R; }
LePage Real Estate Services.
2 ]3 Q% y6 y% r8 a& V& N0 c# E! X0 ?) r" _7 ~
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 ~/ {) c+ |3 |
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ J2 |) a4 y0 D5 M V
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and0 _! r9 x6 I3 s( P' N
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
& F% P; {. `) W3 S6 W5 ^! V, I! N. Nresidential real estate sector.. v) @2 H3 f9 _1 T
$ s% D, S4 p* |+ L; P
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 g/ R4 L7 X8 o& Y; q
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)5 Z8 \3 s `: Z' I D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
& N# E: U5 h- d4 P6 {' q8 g+ z8 {(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380 ~% p. B+ D( w: g" v( e' ~
(+13.2%).
% c, t9 O( v9 P/ H x% p2 U6 ~! L3 r8 m2 s1 f7 L
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# x9 i" s$ v- P" m! {. X
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
# ~ I8 l: m! `! W) yfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ g; f3 F; T7 d' bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* P5 Q0 S% V' G" D) N4 Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. b( T* ]1 y, V1 W0 j
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We7 w) `. k0 M" f3 }: ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 |5 m% f$ j, c
balanced market.": }7 p+ m' k( L0 U1 t
. L' i/ z$ P0 _+ d% n7 s- M5 m- [
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ L2 I$ {% P& P7 n* o$ v
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' }/ c' @$ {" g4 C4 ?6 I5 R# s
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued9 d- ]5 I8 y# h8 b9 H2 i
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 h, T' |+ M& V8 ?5 k6 f! f
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 _) W& H1 n: v! ^) H9 o0 C0 d' z V
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& X6 F4 y% L( {) p! T- Z
breaking price appreciations." q3 u1 ~* x7 }, q# z5 t: v
8 F) v& t& o3 _2 y3 ^8 N Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& l8 U; l! a) F( a
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! H1 X7 s% z; n/ Mlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
l% j( W8 ?8 g& S8 V; D2 P! A
; R, Z7 i( m8 W3 l In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) G' _" \4 C. p/ i$ w* c7 G& feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer4 w9 N9 f! \3 x& C. _
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 T' I0 B% ]* Sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.( Q0 q7 F9 T( ^1 [! ?
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
7 P8 m/ \+ T8 d; R1 l+ @3 `greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& o: G4 ~! w! J6 C3 i; P! q" b
price appreciation when compared with 2005., d& U$ W" q# e4 Q: @/ T p# L
. u6 O3 v" Y Y7 A5 j While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 S* Y( K* w+ g! T! j
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ t: Z4 s4 z. E9 a+ s
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
& B' e- y! X# L+ x8 ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ Q# @1 P& m! j, ^* ~$ e
1 ~8 j( }, Y/ S! c5 j* A0 p8 _. M: Q
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the; o3 x3 x* ~$ B
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's V2 I" P5 y* S2 _, @, B
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. e9 M; E" Q {3 x5 v
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general* @. V8 w( h8 J% p9 \
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 ~5 w: W1 p' b" x1 x2 B
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 x, e! z/ f& E; f. [2 Z) f! y6 baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
; p* N" t& H, s' S$ kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
: X$ S' G; r# b2 d9 ^) O4 h v) {/ _0 B ~4 I( @4 n
<<
, [# M h5 ]2 p( X9 O1 ]! X1 c REGIONAL SUMMARIES' j' m3 M* m8 l5 W+ m6 E+ a9 }
>>
7 P9 P. t) K8 ]7 s, ^5 F1 L) V. i$ t9 u- G3 l; J, e+ S
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
8 B6 h. B* ~% K; ]% o3 IHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
+ n4 w( T- u5 {( n' P1 gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
0 v$ c% S8 b" b n" zlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) w: v( R- s0 a$ _renovations.
, A9 Q" y% H9 T& O5 Y
( D: o9 Q* u4 N4 C# I# z/ c The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight: ~% Z8 m$ v- `0 z1 z2 {2 w
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
1 |: \7 p& |: \8 _2 x3 q+ g/ vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and: Y6 x0 ?7 T8 p& {5 \( u3 D
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter. ^$ ?! _: L' |
, Y: K3 N% Z- Q$ K l2 u The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ M* H6 ^ o/ c
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
6 Y. z) u2 ^, \& Z0 ~' [quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 H/ K1 p# o6 ?+ `4 ^; L3 M7 u600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
E/ ]2 O& r* a2 b" ^9 Ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 ~; g/ @# L& m3 q+ p" y+ Qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.. k6 V& p+ q" c1 ^
& M" o" S" g# e: o9 o6 n$ m+ x: P In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced* Z' g }" |7 t; f7 ]4 R$ \/ d- W
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, s; b% O# F% q8 {4 w/ m
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 J% o$ a, k' I4 m) X6 f3 C
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian* w5 ?' q; C6 b: a$ Q$ w- x8 a
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
" L Q$ M; x5 F8 a- [4 v; l" Vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
& x0 ^* [- G% L
8 S: t5 }" {2 T! o" O3 ?* D( N! u Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
( c# y# C2 K Z1 Z- S) r6 Tamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, O! N" D( K' }+ ~+ ` y& U% \. I
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* j' H$ L1 F9 ]5 I( v
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" v2 E9 R# z. I3 |3 }
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
, k8 F, R2 y% k, z
9 Z& I3 X4 g: W7 w; b Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 B- }7 N# ^* h/ mprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
: V" ?5 g+ E7 v; llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
2 K& i% y* C# \ cfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( r% l+ L- r6 J; A; r' a( O- N
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
p% A" E1 @: h5 K5 ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
& M v% f( f! ` {+ Y! x0 t; t: @0 j! rmaking a purchase.4 C3 [% q( ^; \; M7 Y% b
0 l; R6 {( b/ [4 R- W* W4 h& O0 ` Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
K+ }- M, Z" J$ j( [2 P3 _0 ?markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
7 n( ~; _4 p kconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 {: q& K# C2 z0 B5 y5 Tcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting) z; R$ K) ^% ] X. W5 Z) ~! X
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ S0 x( k% ^8 C& O
amenities.
& P# t% `( m6 P h- {) k
6 L# w4 [& m, {- x( o The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 G0 B2 N7 E6 e7 `& T1 h& L
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ l7 k2 _2 H% }# e/ p0 @across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* A" L; _( Z( o) Z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. L7 V7 \* g$ j: Z( adriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 G- |2 r3 E) s& I$ @ {6 sresidence, rather than for investment.
! i' E* ^* F, a! ?4 W) Z9 _; [$ _0 A+ b) p& m; j
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
( M/ _% h) U. p. j4 Ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
& L- Q2 \7 l# h: _* w vin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer0 \( S, Y7 r5 c+ y, V( b5 I
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! V- k) M1 M5 @* t# Z2 u9 wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
$ F2 X; A1 d, K. D! |( [the market.3 Q: m" V* `5 s4 ^. J' @9 y1 Y/ b2 H
; r4 d% d2 b& X' ^8 `
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, g$ ?4 l; J; k, h/ x4 }% r8 @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In( d& l" L3 A8 n0 h4 { x: E
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: H$ Z+ G; S2 i7 \7 b
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- j' R ]% N* {1 yto the shortage of available inventory.
" b0 S% F4 U8 ?* X3 A9 {# J; l
' C6 X* R; W7 W( G/ V Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its/ Z D5 s7 V+ ^; A
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 J' \1 W3 }' c" G8 s8 m q3 P* Fvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses; Z2 H5 d* ?0 `5 ]' x: k
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# W( k" [' S/ x2 P3 C
! \. N. \0 n: l( Y Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
# @. m1 [ N# u) i ]! [, Lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
* H% ~, Z( u( Q; x0 M6 k& nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ h& X* v# d S; w* n r& lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 v l" R' @! ?9 }) Nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; H+ j! X" y5 [4 Z: O8 yseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! d2 {, A- O0 g5 u8 h
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.7 ^6 ~2 ?& j/ ^) n/ S7 V
3 f" }& a" n0 b# `! | Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
7 _; D4 v- E; Y6 x) mas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
" `! C# K- V1 |" `: G4 M7 Premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' a6 q: c1 C* K3 |$ I5 w2 `: R
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: v* Z; K) \0 g0 l3 F- k2 N4 ^increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% n2 ]$ Z; V$ p7 s9 Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly$ ?# H7 G' s2 c! n
towards the end of 2006. % `4 g6 U- L* W# I1 r$ `
& F" _" v" v9 n9 _$ a, A) d; ^$ O2 KWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
- Y$ J- Z! g: s& Z. ^) z b! @* S/ Pinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
N7 j9 B. E8 [" r7 Qto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse$ F, a( k) b2 d& |% x8 A) U% |
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
4 G, v1 E5 Q' l9 F" r/ {foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. B9 _" q ~% [8 P' upressure on tight inventory levels.6 w& I; C8 h8 `
6 a& N) |( |9 ^* h- ~ Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 U0 _) f9 q9 h3 W
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* t# E: x* [0 W8 g9 y9 {
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 C7 ~3 ?7 r4 @, j* Y/ o4 L
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching/ j: T) h. u' B7 H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
" p' ~1 i- F; Q. H7 N
/ w& \3 _& c! h- G9 q <<7 H+ P% Y5 @. ^6 e
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006* S* |, a4 g- M/ f# r- @
- d% R( h1 v5 p. O# \+ z3 ^ z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; H$ {; j" k- V D0 L; n5 u1 i# z Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey& E* J3 N; S: ?- m" U* w9 \2 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ I# q9 N, P; t0 i4 B* b, d! B 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
- u2 v2 d. P& F9 X& k% S, E ~; W Market Average Average % Change Average Average
$ c6 ^1 S5 V& J0 f4 P- J, H C -------------------------------------------------------------------------& V! f& y4 r0 K9 ?- a6 A+ S
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ u( y: z3 _9 C g) E! l* F2 Z0 \& y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 T1 Q! K6 S8 E, P+ a Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000) C: q8 a( k( R% _0 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& |3 {+ M) X6 Y
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000! A* v, x! ]6 }/ m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# }( O0 ?' ]* b( x
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
! E2 |& K6 F# r- N4 l% e -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ G$ B3 o" ?/ p
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
' ?; X* b! i$ ?1 q$ j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" c- P8 S7 D0 `5 B8 C7 d* G: t0 m Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583- a0 d* H/ k9 W8 K1 J! }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U F- @5 N! i" c+ \
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1851 y5 f3 a) O3 v+ y/ u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* t6 L# C0 V( r8 ]" b/ D8 f1 `
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2503 l5 n; ~, j- n+ t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: a; q# _( [& E9 Q
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766* n3 p8 H* p. r! O1 P* y- s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 j: F& X: C7 n# l' X
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7071 l6 l! v* m" H8 N2 h" |/ e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ u: d% W; Q4 H; s
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
/ K7 c. c/ i2 L5 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 k" T* u$ c: z% A* e/ \+ h% t; @
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
( Y0 O" b1 y! Q6 V0 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 F* r0 j- G+ \) K# X: l
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714- e' K7 Z6 R# ~ o! l" h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ~% l" Y3 Z9 a7 K Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500" w4 a; @# {: P. f: n9 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ]# p- ^3 ]0 n
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
( J6 s) G% M! G" A( {* @ ?3 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 K: G. v# ~# {7 K8 A
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
' g! {- G, E6 O3 X4 x8 Z4 u' d) J( ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------" }- g; {- L% c! p* r0 U e
2 m" r8 ?3 R) R; B0 z3 x5 u3 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
( G3 S$ e( ~3 x. r8 f/ b4 a Standard Condominium$ N1 J3 _/ i- r. q
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ X9 |9 D7 K) n 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 ?7 J# D6 F/ t4 G" U4 Z
Market % Change Average Average % Change
" P4 V4 {8 [% {+ t$ a$ G: D2 w ------------------------------------------------------------- A5 |3 ~6 S1 M9 U
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
0 o* q7 o; u6 d& M/ ~% Y1 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------( k; k: S7 \) j
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# T& _* V0 Z, u& ^, z/ V -------------------------------------------------------------
' H- N8 V/ i. L' O* M Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
- h" w2 j+ v9 H* j3 P8 Q4 t. e -------------------------------------------------------------' u4 U4 G( e) @ g; B+ c
Saint John N/A - - N/A) Q1 w0 i& r* C% x; Y5 k9 N
-------------------------------------------------------------4 J) h0 C1 q! m& d( U/ l. G
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%9 W' k! p: d+ A3 P6 Q) ~& Y( h9 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
, m6 |2 Q3 Z$ t( X6 b; e, f Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
D: s8 Z& D' v& ]9 e7 p" ^% x% e -------------------------------------------------------------
1 W9 r/ }: _5 v9 Q) @# W Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%: Z5 ^9 E) [! R- O0 U3 g% H
-------------------------------------------------------------) N' i* f) @5 V
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
; y( J9 j+ ~2 P- q7 w1 u% t -------------------------------------------------------------. e: M1 L$ X6 w& ^) Q8 m
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%6 R2 p- Z( m; J. Z6 L2 G! T* `
-------------------------------------------------------------/ z9 F" s+ n* @8 h
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
, \. I$ E% F+ |6 L1 m) I* \ -------------------------------------------------------------
9 U5 o6 z" N$ O0 p3 U Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%$ P& z: _3 o) D
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 `( t3 O {4 ?, k! T" u Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%0 p3 F! _9 \9 N7 Y( c7 O: e9 i" ~; C! n
-------------------------------------------------------------
( |+ ^0 u; J- D- l Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: s& \2 H1 r. e& g' _$ T* e -------------------------------------------------------------
4 e& h3 }. P' G# a Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 C( f3 ?# a8 h' M3 t6 |+ e
-------------------------------------------------------------( j, g$ o% @2 b" V; u9 }/ j
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
1 u) m3 ?1 I" J -------------------------------------------------------------/ U' D/ t! u- v4 K+ ^ a+ }) S
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%$ N- j( f- O; D! Q2 F: V
-------------------------------------------------------------
" Z) k d/ Q( `* n0 h1 v! G >>* J3 W" j+ C9 \9 b, [7 A8 P
0 |3 C) D& T$ y6 _ P( J( t Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 M, k6 Z' I, z2 v' m* y [in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 X; s2 I2 o a+ I: |" q; U! I* VJohn and Victoria.
K2 t/ p2 b; i2 M" l
: L c: T% n" r( \ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
. X5 S* s; J2 ~2 u* L" Zcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
$ r! }6 ~! c. J% \' g ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release+ f6 I9 B5 ^. H% f; N
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
! V/ M2 H q6 q: b% ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; s- t8 d+ [2 ^) O$ ^/ f" L
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
% F4 Y+ C7 N9 a+ _. s7 B7 S! `available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 p9 W) z7 s8 i n3 @- p' v3 o
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
# e d& q9 M& I" A* Qversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 Q* F- p6 ]- h$ W) g' f. fNovember 15, 2006.
0 l" k T4 D3 z3 L Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. s. M) o& M6 b+ A2 M+ x1 r7 m" D) Gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge5 W' N( L' y& }7 h
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
6 O, H5 w+ @8 B9 h7 b7 o6 Havailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|