 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + |" E& o% v4 j! d! l: M, w* g
# I& _, c4 p3 m7 J! D
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
, |8 q/ u+ i$ v, N! G9 v
: d# l6 L" ^! Z TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market: ?" |2 q+ |# S6 d% R( Y9 k8 `, X# J" r
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" p) [; U" D5 \$ aquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic; m% x d) J: X3 H- ?
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
3 Q' m, I j) r9 @7 w8 B( lprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 _6 R/ F& X8 e, h2 y+ R9 p$ \
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario, s+ I" q8 ?& A/ C; |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. ?2 G) v+ l1 b* }6 b. H8 A
LePage Real Estate Services.' R4 u0 k5 n3 g8 R. Y! e5 N
z+ C9 i) ^& W: R$ k) l1 H
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ ]) Y O! J7 z1 ]/ g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& v5 _* P; ^5 N. Sconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and' c. S+ r, e+ j
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
" L4 |: K+ A" _' W2 W7 F( s* vresidential real estate sector., B6 w$ @/ Z* g1 ?! z
6 H+ y' S( O- v7 k" p, }) S. i Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
- v4 Y, l0 q" Ioccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 m( Y2 _5 D; N. l+ N; Q3 Z
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 n2 R1 c O* u8 n. |4 J
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
. X9 L+ ?+ K' W4 _(+13.2%).# J, Q/ D4 V5 `/ \ d% B) j
% u3 V+ t, y6 r# z2 { "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
# I- ^* K! T$ z( cduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ s. A* S# c( p' s) y/ B% e
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 g; M9 D( @+ s. A9 s) \& T2 Q9 {
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 j8 l" ^5 `! b" g8 y f: vpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( w$ W) U3 h# |4 m' ^( r+ a1 J
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
0 _/ @8 J3 v2 w: E9 ~2 q+ wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 I! A) C7 v0 |$ }: d" H+ v( N9 fbalanced market."
* }+ I/ v0 j* X' I, L: F
, l" d- q) w" a' A! x, a I2 b Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,, v& G4 B& y! B. |5 I6 G: |; @
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 e3 w0 p0 H" N- S5 O
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
) k, [ E& v, i Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! O7 F% y( U4 z0 t" j; l" U9 b$ Cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
S" g' a$ u& i! L e% r, y+ u4 p8 Wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
% C. V& }' ^* fbreaking price appreciations.. O8 ?0 Q$ P5 c" A+ o! d7 N
3 b7 [" N8 I6 q% \+ r3 e: F! D
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 q: k, |5 z4 D7 A, meconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
3 w/ ~9 e( l: _& s8 ]6 Glargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( I7 ~; k, _4 ?& y3 c7 q5 D: p
0 g* N3 \% T. Z% N In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 N7 c4 l7 z0 \4 N5 Q+ J3 C% p
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
, s: Y6 F, }7 a# Z3 u6 A6 a2 Sconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" s6 h9 D% m4 D; o7 g9 G: L Wslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% p3 y# r) `' Z1 g& \
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 t5 v" y6 s- Igreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, M! Z6 B4 |9 n& I
price appreciation when compared with 2005.& Q3 E. P. h2 u/ H2 Y! y
, \1 P: l. C. [4 \$ w: V While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* q6 P! Z& B5 Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 K9 t& ?; ^& l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: c2 K( q d( K) N' Uare markedly different than those found in the United States.
: q; M1 T# |) X( a1 Y+ O' m
; W1 {5 }4 k& G7 p& }, B% B Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 e- Q' ~* k. Q6 n* k; O0 aAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- s# ~/ X+ n$ F' c1 P+ z. Tfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ C; o. F( e. a+ \/ n8 c* f* q+ drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: b( P; i! a3 m
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
2 o W& e" r5 h2 Z- vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and v7 r4 O8 P& s, e& H2 V" e
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) Z+ |# o8 Y8 m6 @mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."5 R: ~8 ~5 a2 }9 c5 V
& Q5 l. {. k; P; {) s- S3 Z4 _ <<
& j/ v3 ^ b! F- V8 ^9 [ REGIONAL SUMMARIES
$ {) S( k! ?6 {# e. u >>; r7 L+ t( x4 l# }
) Y, m; z) t% j7 z6 }4 q0 ?" o
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 B, Q: Z7 O. X" ]) z$ P9 [
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate" m/ @( m" H( B0 P
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& Z7 i: a0 q! P2 a
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- S6 `+ ~$ i* w; ~8 f H) yrenovations.3 y9 F2 J. J. V4 U' q
! u* ?; d6 Q. w/ d# E& k
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 y6 ]0 X9 K2 bincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% K( y! J0 o- A) A. C
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
" e& R" }( z9 B; XSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
s8 o8 L4 r( \% @& u- U, I5 o; I: Q2 E; a
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
8 U+ p! L* F, W$ s0 x$ Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the ]* b( Q5 f% n& }
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new4 [" J1 y3 g& `7 b
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores3 T4 k3 K' E% g" x
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes- V; w6 G0 Y; W
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: f: O+ f y% [# n
0 s4 o3 N* p7 x In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: n" |8 o1 U# x% X. Econditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their* ?- Y1 r+ {" ]# |( t
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers6 _9 V! W1 r( S" F; X8 P, P
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
9 E& s% m1 H; W1 Wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing: ?$ W/ b, m$ V4 C1 W3 |3 t
buyers with more options when looking for a home.) Q, }* l8 j5 ?1 X( Z* r
: c S4 x. r# B' H6 w3 f ~, u Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 k2 t- w9 m4 j+ o% Q# Oamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes7 m# k5 s6 K0 a2 j& n* {% c
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' d' p. o( _/ R2 m4 l
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last0 i b" G4 v% X( h
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% C. O m$ ]1 C) a- ]. I' c4 `5 E* H6 r: Q/ I
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house2 L9 ?3 w" @7 U' k: _' e7 W& C- k
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory# m R B8 [1 v: J
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% [4 m& n' l$ X/ \2 o% V2 Lfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 ~+ w5 \! G& c f& K
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! V' J+ r X; E0 H& q( T. H
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 Z2 g# o# w( B) t- z# Gmaking a purchase.! H2 K5 H" C. D8 M- @
/ v' a4 f' Z/ A5 _- R. { Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! {1 M( I+ n h; Y4 W- T i
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( s Z) Q) ^3 ^confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 r9 c: L( O; }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% ^3 h/ q2 T- q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 m3 w# e1 _6 J7 e- r3 D* tamenities.1 @ _; Z A' w' _9 q
8 y4 s. t) o9 _- @+ g The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels Y1 N A1 D) }( r9 A; ?9 E
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 y" Y4 Y* B8 F) _6 a" |2 \; Qacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& v( q* J, e- u U/ kcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been# p0 Q; o) K( s1 n# W, s" V
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. T/ V% e# F1 Q5 K# Z- j) X$ ~- Cresidence, rather than for investment.$ m- g6 p# s+ T+ ]5 y2 P
9 E Q: L3 |' i! F* u h
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. n }0 [, M9 e. H5 B' G! }/ X0 V
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
# A/ C# B7 K. F& W r/ @+ Jin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 t# D2 k6 N6 B' d% kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization4 X% q8 G, p* Q- ^0 l6 l$ \
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
$ S- R6 y; @0 l$ w& C# ^the market." o4 a- t9 s3 E, c% o" q. Q; }
$ Y* Q; u5 `* g2 f2 I- c2 R
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
g# O# E; c5 N$ XJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
. I9 P0 F4 I. h! R, p9 R7 iAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- W, l3 B, _. _% I9 s
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due" c1 F6 Q9 h4 A! \* i/ I
to the shortage of available inventory.8 E8 i- [8 d% w5 J* x3 _: P6 D
( M: s2 e; U6 w! H( p5 R5 A* `
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 Z8 |+ Z. @0 Emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
" s+ H* H' h9 u! P! avibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses5 H U1 z# z, V8 r/ L
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.+ }# p1 S# n; {# t S1 _0 ~
- S3 J1 Z2 l) q2 E9 f
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
4 l% n4 P9 K, v E: \, X x: gin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low6 x4 T3 W+ z* g" d% M" @; }' i
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that9 X* [3 ~0 ^3 I9 P( w, G+ j% a" D
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: V# B' @9 d' Q1 Z# I; K
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ Y% \) p/ j7 U( d2 fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 N8 u' B8 N9 W: G
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 Z7 D- w6 v9 G P4 ~/ P* K0 G3 n- j3 N# U8 @8 \
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, d) r( I( k6 f& m( J0 t4 `7 C+ I: e
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton3 o2 ^ H6 j# U7 q) }( V; v
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 Z0 [ T4 z) ~' e$ E! Ymaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- ?7 [: _) M2 \
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. G: ?* m* O8 c0 w7 r& r" Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 Y2 g! h# L; {; c
towards the end of 2006.
8 Q- M. q' n( X7 |' H3 d( B: g
' q; e9 N3 k* U. W7 t9 L; B Q6 rWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 @ K! K# Q! x X |5 j$ b
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable: N6 e. L+ i! w" b
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 ] t" X' ~. I# M* J3 U
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( g. C- A* W3 O, p/ Y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added4 F4 p3 w ^: p* A
pressure on tight inventory levels.
) H& i/ q9 V* e. b7 D. e0 \( o; U! g
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
' P S5 b/ r \' V) pfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
& L9 P P$ @9 J- g8 rinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( Q4 V. K+ a$ p
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 I l4 H/ R8 u/ P% [9 q/ Z0 _ x6 r
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: O, D3 T" _+ l% m+ a
, I }1 H3 U( Q( k+ |' g <<
" S% S( c; S& ~* h6 O0 G1 _5 b Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 A/ ~( N+ r6 m; M% s- w+ W7 Y& _6 {' l# W# h0 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~# N* I" T) i) D0 @% q( k6 F9 j
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 C8 \; ~3 a: @, N6 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------# u- q5 L b" V4 N2 R; _
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3. F$ d0 @; {5 L* z% D
Market Average Average % Change Average Average2 G( c6 J! p! c# A" g4 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ |( B: p" z) R' X" q" y& e Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
- G' X8 C8 A6 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 b+ A/ A G, ] Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000& g$ _' R' U E7 c% ~3 o7 x, o7 S& i( l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! v: ]9 U+ a; x9 ^9 H
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0003 j' S; L) B1 |. v8 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 i" w+ f1 W. Z Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -; K+ t# |$ B: }5 i- E" J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; B4 S, x8 w t( r5 a1 s
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
: v, F: n0 m U ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q s3 }4 {* y6 @
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583% `! ?* ?( J1 x7 p5 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% d& k! B' l; O; E0 n0 B t Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
' l* J) Y* P# N% e( ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 c2 H% M' \$ O3 z& S6 l Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250: h* r1 e$ H) ?$ S c+ j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: n; D7 _5 H7 J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766+ Y: ~3 a1 y0 G' f9 ]( [, f: Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- e+ e3 S0 G6 |7 P Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( f) A: p u( r( J6 m8 Q* ^# N; K ------------------------------------------------------------------------- u, `+ U N4 L% Z
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500# I; M2 ~( _! n, j1 L% I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ D m9 E# w2 y; b0 U2 K! ~$ N* a Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3898 m& d* \& D+ L% Z" j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
T; A; N7 h" g9 V2 W. F Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
) I9 C6 ?! N# R! n& L6 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------: e Z {$ {) `' \7 Y4 m+ u# h
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500: s, [/ J% R% C0 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, x" I2 w1 E2 @ D) ~0 g1 U2 m
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000! I# ^) T/ X' Z' q2 f( u5 t0 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ t. R/ S9 E0 r3 a7 p; K( u National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860$ j9 s w) K0 G7 k1 g- d0 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 a2 u( @2 W2 K4 V4 i$ _7 }
, s0 ]& Q/ k! j' X -------------------------------------------------------------
! b T v: {: h+ G0 c6 D$ ^ Standard Condominium5 g: Q' Z& m4 J2 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 L* ?4 t3 v3 G* d. \ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
% h' O n* H6 c( U( g1 a$ J# M Market % Change Average Average % Change' q/ @; @( ~: [6 l$ E; E9 P) g
-------------------------------------------------------------) l1 g6 d; i B0 }/ E1 A
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9% ^2 E8 u' u7 C' o! ~; m- S3 d
-------------------------------------------------------------- T, V3 H' J& u+ j/ S' R
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
9 P, O# Y7 h% H, X9 V# [ -------------------------------------------------------------* r" i& Q3 C9 L8 g; J! o3 g
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 J; k4 r, ~$ Y -------------------------------------------------------------9 H- P, e# l! c U! ^3 D- d# r: U
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ p2 h. L6 p$ E3 {
-------------------------------------------------------------0 T8 R" r4 j8 J8 U. Q
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
% D, ^+ z9 c! q2 D, B( ]; B: B -------------------------------------------------------------
( T3 O' d( }+ i4 T9 F Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%+ ~$ m# Z# g8 {0 M7 N* V
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ d ]$ Z$ i8 ~/ r" q0 ` Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
' Q3 L5 |' q9 z -------------------------------------------------------------4 J4 I, @8 E! \7 D
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%& ^4 C& ~- A( a) C' B& t/ \6 E
-------------------------------------------------------------2 n' |0 F x x9 L5 u
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
9 C& `7 V2 C/ Y9 }+ Y -------------------------------------------------------------
% h( W, G/ o% n- ]0 c$ g0 M Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; u( z( X" L% t7 P3 b0 j$ l2 [
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 q( M& t M3 R" p/ S Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 U6 G/ w( k& s. o -------------------------------------------------------------
5 l6 j; E1 x0 k; Y! G N Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- M& M0 y# r. u' E) y -------------------------------------------------------------4 O0 X/ ]* q9 O; U
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
- c4 b3 T4 G4 s) [) R$ L6 w6 C -------------------------------------------------------------
! q- [$ u1 N: q' E# A6 y5 q Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
$ q1 C" Z& I& L) Y4 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------8 c' T' M$ }" u
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%7 W, z; Y8 i! Y
-------------------------------------------------------------/ n, H8 m% O8 v9 u0 R1 Y
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
# N: N1 k0 i8 v' L. ~2 c6 G -------------------------------------------------------------
' F h: _7 E' V2 v# p* p a, t( B >>/ h7 Q& \& @8 J' W' U M* d& x$ t
5 l3 P3 q; {( e/ V Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined6 b- T; E0 o# G- @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
! {- A i% Z% _$ ]John and Victoria.
$ d0 u* V1 ]/ @6 z4 z8 F3 w# L/ ]& I1 \) d: U; z
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 @: _2 J4 P: ?$ E0 vcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 A) X3 q' |1 w( Z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 z5 N* f1 _3 D$ x# d) T5 m: ereferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ X2 y+ k/ ]& [1 i3 F( y) q i
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 ^) e+ y$ L! A% p% Y; _+ T+ kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ g! Z" ?4 M* h$ c3 Q8 p+ @available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 u4 Y5 Y( |' n' E
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 H: c. }- g1 O3 x/ a6 [9 U
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) q2 F G! O" t2 A/ y8 b" _. U4 a
November 15, 2006.
2 ?7 K6 Q1 d% q- s5 m+ ~/ [1 c Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 q" z: T E. l2 C. Qfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! |/ F" Q: C6 @7 M
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ Y2 r) ~ E' z3 H
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|