埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2747|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' O9 p# u/ j3 ?' T5 e' U
6 ~2 T3 X8 D8 w% q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ q  c; ]5 u  n3 }/ G! b% V' T) s% e" I2 }. k) q5 d* b
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
4 w" Q, z6 `( l) z% nexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" W' ?+ Y' D" H2 B1 ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, _. P  C5 f+ ?) ]+ R+ U
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' A3 n- [! \# w4 l
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 H/ X2 ^8 ^$ q& l! Qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% y! ~  C7 l9 A3 z
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- ~- {4 G0 M$ B4 ]* g9 k' [9 A
LePage Real Estate Services.
1 n5 Z  P, m/ g( t
" H1 l  m  B. T0 k. e    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 h5 j$ h" m3 S
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic# [( f/ X* R$ Q* z+ j- K
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and4 u9 c) S% \! ?$ X; G" ~8 N# i) t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) d$ n% q8 d0 V0 j7 n2 E, I6 G( v
residential real estate sector.
8 _* k2 q. h) j8 v. ]0 B: i* V7 D( d4 P+ [" d# U7 @/ K
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
7 ^9 ~! n( _+ B3 _6 ^$ h! toccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% _0 S8 y! j; S  D0 f: c" W
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
; w2 r. M2 N9 e  q3 [& a7 ](+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3808 d# F# O7 p& `- b
(+13.2%).
0 c+ z* ~5 s9 Z: _4 B6 R5 l9 N& X, ]+ y- h7 ]
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth6 Z3 @/ w+ ]( ]0 U" y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: e  _7 y# b) A8 H# Lfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
. B" R$ k% E( jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; B2 I; f; z' y9 O  G8 t
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( a- M9 Z& P4 x"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We, j# Y/ n$ b$ m; b$ |8 M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# a" t; V$ |  {7 ~. D
balanced market."( _" {$ L. L) e9 o

: `! i+ P  a; q    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- M, J% E; ?& |" Mconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
8 _  q6 Q% [: Q/ ?$ K/ cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( Y1 M+ X# M: r: i' f( U2 Lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, \; Y  R" `; m5 Fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 a" k; z; J5 e" |3 A) h: r; Gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: j, Z. X) l; t5 z, Z- m
breaking price appreciations.- ?$ G* B$ X2 c) w6 o- X

0 O+ z$ ^  @! F# }' P, Y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( G, `5 S$ v8 ~0 \- U8 H( w
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
/ m3 G2 ?  R* U" g7 P/ ]3 V2 M$ nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 @) V% W% Y' |, F' Z7 ]- \' A# _# ~4 j- y
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid4 ]( W8 N. I+ a9 [. e6 P/ @
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 y; L3 ?. X) d5 r( a& I9 n! ^8 ~
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ g9 t* c/ S4 pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ h1 p* F" T- vIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ ]! J5 b+ [& k2 Y( q7 Z2 e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 D5 t4 d$ j9 ?/ wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.$ d& f) B8 J- b% C) F, [

# X+ T( g) ^* R    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing  j) l- o* ]5 R  A# u5 C
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( u; \7 d. q7 Y7 k; u7 [
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, l( K2 H9 L8 f3 S
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
! Z$ m# w5 b1 K6 d
; S2 k+ z3 T8 ]$ W/ U    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' U: m" q5 P- u7 X5 i  {7 ^& j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. E' F* c0 g. `2 Tfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) O( f& X0 u9 r+ J* t& n
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general5 Y: W' T( d" y; I" H
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 i4 g# f# \2 H
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and0 G" T% F9 I7 b1 G2 S& U: m9 S
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ O% n% _9 E# g6 U* l& l" X7 z+ l8 {mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ u6 y1 |1 {% I

: R9 u/ ~% _# p& W+ r    <<1 y+ _3 T$ q' a8 e* b
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES6 @4 U, \% y# ]7 l* L; u
    >>
  m1 Z6 a7 p( b$ [
) _8 F7 @' s6 ~3 ~8 A1 L0 d' k    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ C7 G9 Q* b0 O+ UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. l( u% B& A; ~) B
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ _( x6 T, o" _$ e$ }+ r
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
* f9 N9 B% ^- t! o: Grenovations.$ A$ E5 x% a' {2 t1 b

. K7 K2 u0 w# P* `8 Q    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 ?9 J* a* E/ A% h8 Y- J0 Tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
# s% k* C' D. p, B% Icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and% ]% D* @) ~) r1 w
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.! T% F% O. y2 L0 ^7 ^
8 m' W% x' w/ ^! E% m2 M
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
# X; Y! d2 O8 m- \slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: a. k0 ?& v3 t. Q& k3 s# s" p4 equarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new% S1 B: T2 n3 Y! K' s6 x
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 [; o( o: h1 b- rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes; `7 @& @  U6 r6 B
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 o) U4 o: {9 Y3 Y% W

/ G( P* b( w$ p6 u    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ g7 \. r. a+ y& P' \
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ L. g! p  [3 ~+ t2 e% Vhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers  A7 Q. s, }0 K0 T  L3 d  I" j
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: V% D6 D+ D: L9 f
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: W6 s- V' |9 ]8 K. ?buyers with more options when looking for a home.
) ?" N0 c9 ?" O; U: Y4 F/ o% t% m
. O7 w# B$ P( ]( J: O' E0 s2 \    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! u$ T9 ], q5 m/ t2 h* ^
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! a! z: O, Z+ k6 ^( [: d+ @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( `* k9 l' W& X# T' S
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. |3 Y+ ], A/ M+ W. s+ Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.  F8 V0 B, U$ _( c
; |5 u+ b" \) r1 K2 d9 `' s; g( }
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
% V4 S  s$ w1 x  ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory" Z; U; E8 D$ ^$ i' U. x+ F3 K
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 L' K3 M1 j. s  H# q  m  b- U0 I
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 C% L1 b/ z2 c$ v) b% swhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ ]% g# O) N' O2 lpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 c1 s- [, k7 N2 ]! b1 [making a purchase.
4 c+ i% G' O; B1 x& F8 ^6 j6 B/ }& ~: t" S  A6 P+ K
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# {4 R8 m2 r9 L
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong3 }; s1 g/ G5 n* w# L7 N& ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ O7 i- z1 ^/ W; ?, \' K) |: q# H& ?6 fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) d5 f* w6 i# a2 zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; `- r6 Z2 b2 ?9 f0 Iamenities.! u3 k2 H1 ]/ N' k: r" `$ V; d
3 N) u$ R  @7 v) b& \/ h
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 S3 v% N1 b( O4 l
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
2 J& }% w- T$ E& i, V% ?# hacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has  k" R  r+ ?1 z' C- G, `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
, r2 e8 Z  L) |: \1 }. C* |driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 I% _; h. Y3 z) S+ }3 V* i& t/ V1 q
residence, rather than for investment.
, H9 b' v, n' y3 K- G8 x: w8 m: j7 g% R: G# t( m- @& K
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as' Q8 `2 Z; o0 y% w! h3 w
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ V5 _0 D  [. X8 t6 V
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- M+ }' I8 D3 x! u4 m2 p* y
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* d( t  A1 }3 @rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( M' j$ ~7 _; i0 {1 i9 N- y, a
the market.
9 E& W- d6 f2 z) p- A( u  A& Q% ]/ }4 i
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ v: v* w' q$ Q, i9 Y) P
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- p' I$ i* p3 E3 M% E
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 f/ `8 w3 X. V9 {. Y  \4 o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
& ~0 ?6 w" I( f. q' f( ?to the shortage of available inventory./ N9 ~# Q- }! k
7 {, z3 h- ]( a+ u/ }! W/ j7 m2 P
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, x4 s& D7 P# ]( m6 Y) pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
  [/ ^, X9 q1 B! Xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 L% ~) f9 B* U' fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; L- Z" Z' f9 l7 S  T
4 k+ L, e2 b+ m' h* T    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- s8 `5 Z- G7 E% \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. f6 v- B9 \: y9 ~( n2 [2 Xunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
1 M: `$ M. n+ l0 l- dpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
+ M( g# S' T# C& o/ [1 S( Bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 Y; O" V, t3 o: v
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 _* T' N, P% p2 g% X
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

9 u# ^& B, q+ S$ J2 o. k/ H5 z+ u. x2 B5 }. V
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter$ y- A/ K* ^" Z+ P, Q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 a+ M- c/ @* w' c( vremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 a2 V. J. m! J) J, l" umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( l( ^8 c/ `% K! k: h& ]
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 `8 K6 K! R& _: j$ M) Q7 D: c
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly7 R3 `. i8 D7 s9 D" h5 F
towards the end of 2006.
    & h8 `" N) V  q# f/ ?" h, ~

3 R6 l4 @' N: s( C; [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; h$ y9 T# D" Q! Qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 W; m: C9 ]5 X, v
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 E3 i1 O; ^, o+ o! Sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) B! b0 M% _/ C! ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 b- E, u$ U7 M" a: apressure on tight inventory levels.% q3 Q2 @: b: q2 f/ S- X0 S* e
5 [* M. V' Q% H, w
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, K: e' o. X' d0 Q: U& X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
  v$ m. J; `$ V. U' Qinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
& t( p  g1 ]& e* U7 [; r2 e/ iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 k7 f* m* }. H0 wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# o- O9 |7 H" f* e. r; e

% c& [! U0 h3 w. T4 Z& J& a    <<" I* g3 ~. x5 m" c8 {, k& m" l
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 ?1 s* P/ S  r
4 Q( Y2 l( T1 c' v3 ~6 @1 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 S* k% L. }; I9 E5 T8 Q
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey% n5 @# ]* b7 b( [" D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* h3 P1 X5 h0 L# x3 c' |                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
+ ?) ^! }) Z2 E5 E    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
7 S3 K: N9 w* m! ]4 O# R/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: i- X' u3 D) j# S: y. b    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000/ Y2 s" |5 f  Y' B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' J( `6 u) _7 y- K# I" _/ n    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
7 b: Z7 @7 u. K* O1 Z# Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 a. }, Z% Y" p$ q+ z    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0004 g3 W. i3 ~. K4 {* g4 k- P$ h+ C/ D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 p; g" n0 T! Y: ?2 l2 h8 P9 E    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -2 G. q$ d# b& a. f: ~! a5 o9 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! V8 B" ^% A. d& q9 `9 W
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
" a6 m  G+ h8 ^0 Y- j$ D- T8 B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ w9 z7 N7 |: r4 h5 B& L
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583& a4 ~+ z4 R+ p, Y  F* Z2 h1 f! A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' j, g/ X9 d( m# i! K0 F/ B" T
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
+ {9 S8 D+ K# \* u( ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ?( b8 U) O; ?' F* `; s1 r    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250% M3 |! }, }, k1 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 K  _, P- ~) A$ U) r5 }    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
6 p8 Z  }( ?: _# K. r/ B% ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; v3 G. `# X- L1 C; I4 x0 i
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707% ?$ w+ P9 W9 J4 E% ]) V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& i/ @7 a( j9 n" p    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500) C+ a8 \5 P. G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  k6 l: o; y7 m
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
' c0 P% n# y4 h2 X5 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 e2 d8 r9 h1 f! {3 k
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 s3 G/ O8 `. ?4 J6 L9 @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ L4 t! v: i2 X    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
; ?9 Q# o3 o7 h' s. C  R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# f5 o4 t; |& o) {0 ~    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0003 T" a+ x0 \6 }7 h! D& X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% g& \$ j0 m  D& ~    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
* x! O/ }7 K. N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, Y( K7 Y: ~8 {, W  F9 j! K4 M
4 l1 C! T- m$ Q, p7 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ k# i. U  V: I5 d( K! g: _1 K
                               Standard Condominium
: m0 W1 q- d5 h, j    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ n) k, T3 t% _5 Q                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 ]# _' z( J' Q$ N' c    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
: P9 y- `1 F; I! @9 M  r' y    -------------------------------------------------------------: r7 X, \. v3 W: Y  ?( |( c  c
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%: C4 [* ~- ^( `# T1 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ [: ?' d4 l% ?7 W1 ^% ?; Z, c
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
) R* k# H1 p6 }3 ?' y+ S* ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 a9 A) a, n, o+ d3 ~, @    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
' Z2 J4 z* n; n  f; u) W    -------------------------------------------------------------
- G2 g0 B) I. T0 s" Q' ]9 F" a4 T# X    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
+ ?. v. k- V, L. T7 E+ g    -------------------------------------------------------------! d' H* R9 e, h1 |' D
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%( V0 Y) D( S4 ^! Z( r' I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 i1 O6 q% L- {/ Y' Q9 e( r2 i    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
& }4 \% {" x9 O) d/ `  _, X4 ?# j4 j    -------------------------------------------------------------9 E# U9 G0 V$ \4 j5 {
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%7 a3 W3 I4 V& e2 Q4 C- [  Q# A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% S- P7 |/ R8 B9 M    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
  V! x- p9 f% F* F8 v8 [( P    -------------------------------------------------------------
" v/ V' s8 {6 E2 i) c    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
( r/ o3 s! }' r2 J; B" A- O6 |/ E    -------------------------------------------------------------' I& ?0 [9 W9 r$ C/ R' y
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%- P8 I9 X0 S6 b3 t( C8 u: e! w
    -------------------------------------------------------------* t  h5 y, Y( ~9 }: |* R
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
* y7 ^" m0 E* c( L, ?, a' U* J* H    -------------------------------------------------------------$ A  l2 H! o1 @. z8 I
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%1 U" R5 C( M- G( D  ]# }# n6 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------; S$ G3 S1 z3 I9 N# s
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
7 V, q4 y( [- s4 I    -------------------------------------------------------------' D, k6 G1 S* L; Q+ z9 u: \
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
$ h& N$ {1 U) a7 @' H/ o    -------------------------------------------------------------" \8 J1 r. W7 Y/ [/ i
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%# J' H" T7 }7 Z/ D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  ]6 S) Y2 t3 B7 F$ R: R) u7 t) I  r    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%4 E' w3 d- o$ X' o% I, Q, l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 C  T3 r4 S" W1 N$ u1 Z5 O' U    >>
8 F# N; \$ l- S1 j) J& b1 T7 A% l0 l
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 q, m7 P& ^* n$ c- M- w  w$ V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: g6 H$ D3 v  j# C" hJohn and Victoria.
* z  ~- M+ M2 T2 ]
2 p' P/ V1 a( e; m; ~: M& s4 N    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 c8 [1 m+ f- g+ _# z/ N; k) n0 T
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( n, T# I  M3 Y+ K" n
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. H) d: K9 n# g
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) \8 d2 p9 e- atrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& B; q. X! @' ?3 ~5 ^9 c+ z0 V4 s% ~across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 a) k- T8 R: D* h) l! Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 J0 x, [8 O; Z( L! P% a; Lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 W! G; b+ u8 z- \: [) w
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 |* Q5 y. y/ S& ]: n7 XNovember 15, 2006.( E; y  C2 z5 M) \6 L
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of' }; P; L3 D, F) \) g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
# F! b3 i, X1 @2 xprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is- m. h( X' v9 F  W/ Q  @5 _/ `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-6 12:09 , Processed in 0.129663 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表