埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2283|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
/ u+ {2 i; j1 o; a) }8 F5 @' A! T. A+ T; N5 G* U' O# M, p0 t. s* h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ R7 Y4 T8 h% r* O1 {' u! d  ~, F

4 x9 T. n' Q- h* [( V5 y    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 y7 J3 z" k; ^0 s8 k$ a  oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
! y1 M* k: B! P. o, J  zquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: g- y; ]7 a" z9 d7 G( hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 p9 i% P% Q" i0 j# @6 w% a( }4 ^
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
) d6 c# |( `( k$ R' Z8 _' L& {0 ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
4 n& H: \* E& r8 A2 y' C( y& [Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
7 A4 J5 Q: d/ w/ L0 |1 N8 \; qLePage Real Estate Services.3 W+ u4 ?7 w) Z" R) H  ~- E% ?

# a$ @" L6 e) o+ d# l! d. N8 I    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
9 H0 P( p9 q, z7 J9 ~are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic1 \; q  d7 [3 p3 o, Z& H3 v' Q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 E9 F6 m" M& K: I3 R- _2 esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# p! j+ B1 w8 |residential real estate sector.: f) @9 n% ~, c
# S% z7 E7 C# v" S# g$ A
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! S7 W/ t8 @, T8 a  _
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); [! a* C# A: D2 g) x( o/ f
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ ]2 b' A* t7 X, K- f
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 T2 B. `7 ^* |(+13.2%).
* P7 `. E0 ]" F2 a' U
( p. O6 j+ Z4 O  U! A5 C: ?    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
3 p: B6 l; g3 gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the' ~: ~+ R* \) ~, K6 g. t7 d0 H
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
0 F- p- G( L/ H& j* N% Apoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ |) z8 s' L! ~# J8 _president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% Z, v9 F0 G2 G) M6 C2 [- `& e"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We$ s5 H6 }4 S% O
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ E9 g9 @' L1 ^6 Y4 [4 u
balanced market."- o4 H" {, I; Z- C& b% x. \4 \7 @5 M
3 [; ^+ J! T6 c7 c0 r1 P
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
! [# W  k7 Y, k, @7 ]3 w' wconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
! \) a8 g4 _5 W( j! ]( \5 O0 c+ Fto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued3 ^( }3 j' C! i, [  `1 y
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
' I7 k. \, V8 d4 l' Lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
# h! W& W9 ?# \( I( x9 Hmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record1 R& F  r. o" A2 r3 V& d- T" l
breaking price appreciations.7 O; w0 F: Q6 K& u8 ?4 X
( Q. P, M, L% f- z- `% L6 o' }* L& \
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ Z5 d5 ^# k8 }  F0 b9 G) r9 d! _6 ~
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
2 ?( y: B" e! C1 h/ }largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 L4 r8 ~. c& a$ m2 ^* Y( B) v( O% K9 L& h
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
  f5 W7 o! q( O. X1 W# x, Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
0 W! {' Q( \3 Vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 `9 r- {5 c, X& w
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 @( F2 D& u% l% ^7 I; S
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* D2 L# r; W. A; d- ]6 Igreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! R$ F1 P8 i9 U" v
price appreciation when compared with 2005.5 m: I, A$ V1 W. [3 r# ?  e

( f+ M0 f9 i8 A1 a* G7 ?  E; k    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing6 @2 q- ]6 ~, l4 B6 K8 h7 C- M4 f
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( }  o. O. T: {5 V' ^
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
" ]1 G$ z5 |2 k) Z* r3 H* Sare markedly different than those found in the United States.* ?" F& a; U# T) |

) B: @9 J4 l3 h8 v& p) Z; a    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. b" P1 B: c) G5 i7 h  J" y2 X& qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' g$ c5 ?3 x( e0 Ofavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the9 \; d% I" `& {" ?: s
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
) Z  z3 c6 f; k1 a$ faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the' B* z/ K6 B5 T. {9 H+ A/ ?
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
# z/ B7 R, B+ e' Baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 H' Q* ?9 t* m2 o7 I
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.") Z! z. Q/ T$ i# ~! e9 S. j
8 ]  ?, x: i  A. M/ l
    <<
( ^; p4 q2 H8 K, K3 T1 E5 |                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES" q. j  a% ~- o" `
    >>
) n7 M4 ^- d7 d( S: @; O3 y, c3 v& P- r, S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 d2 X& h" Z+ t6 ^8 _9 e* n
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 ?/ R( y1 u. }/ |of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time" s1 p$ h8 a1 A+ t
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" V% }$ a! T) D: C% }
renovations.% H8 G4 A0 G; ^% Y0 m

& a% E& |. y# ~; h% h9 H    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% [2 U+ G9 B8 W' q1 b/ c9 o. g5 Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% b3 \$ @, H8 t  J# I$ O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 W4 `! ]* H! T% M) ]September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: B8 k! v/ T/ Y  G; X
) p- ]+ _% \8 J* b6 |3 e3 O- `
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
' e. x' ?& p+ C4 Qslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 _6 j5 \' E$ U8 S; T) d. I' }quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ V6 H# \: q6 {1 a0 @: A
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 U! e9 a% Q1 v' i- s1 ~
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes( K" u+ D0 r3 r5 y" s/ v9 ~
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 A- Y& s! j+ n9 L" y% D

% n, S# a# T# R, K4 y% R5 W* d    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
5 Z: D6 I- S+ a, vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 f7 G; S+ T& E+ [; @3 }
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 g, R4 r  T) K* @8 r1 n" cwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
9 `; v0 N2 y! x# l5 adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
) D7 C9 x2 |2 ?! ]# O. rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.: U1 x- S9 i8 L. ^- ^
' E& k& d( ~% i. C5 \0 V/ J3 l7 w; u
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly9 `  I# }  m% g- _
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes- q8 ^0 t, S3 {2 w+ M0 Q+ ~
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
8 ~, X. Z) F& W6 ]- Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last& t* u, ]) |) w9 d4 W
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
: F/ l) ]# ?5 S- U4 ]/ @, E, R* x" W9 [$ z2 F
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
, h+ \+ c* ~; W. d( [$ @prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory4 q5 q+ M% u  w, G
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- @* j. G+ c, ^8 G5 t4 K
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! o7 x0 Q& n9 Ywhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
5 W' P  Y2 Y( npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# @, I. ]4 u4 k) W+ k+ Hmaking a purchase.
9 r" W7 N1 u: w
; s. N4 f& D6 [% r0 {! f8 o, J7 _    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! e  f; ^, B* k( y& f: `: w; K" tmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) X; l7 L- i" a8 N
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
7 e" ^7 U  L: G7 B% fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting+ ~4 P; K. L5 d
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
1 v" g7 `$ ^+ D( `( {" namenities.4 I/ {  L& _  ^
% X1 w; S7 b2 N  S; C6 e
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* K- M$ E: h- x6 G& [
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& V" H5 ^, U& \1 O* H8 K6 Eacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 B/ V- u; Y; m- s! r+ m8 t) ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
# y6 K( p) y3 T/ B9 Qdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 Z  `/ K3 y, J
residence, rather than for investment.
) f  U" ~3 v1 Z, w& z/ U. X7 ~2 x- A* q) L  `# O( `
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' O& ~, H& p  R$ Y$ Fhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
  J% y3 r$ n! K! J  xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 P( x" n, N: G2 [+ R) T7 U5 o* kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; S- e! J9 O4 m6 T+ Y% ^  i' U% hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 t7 d0 \+ o+ K/ pthe market.7 @9 R* \% K1 K/ P0 z
# F6 K, j8 h: M$ m7 @6 u
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" F; U5 x1 g% M: m, U+ OJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 z1 a- c. J! x1 `, x! f( UAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ D! ]. O. K4 `1 G" i2 Zmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 A7 V; C# h/ ~4 \2 b. n! w+ v5 ^
to the shortage of available inventory.
' k6 }, {  C+ G! F; [* w6 Y- U0 y6 z6 [0 t. I$ r; H) |7 C; m: o
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& _$ M5 S  f, {7 d3 v, S. }
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 t: V9 @) R  P9 M9 pvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 Z# [0 G6 n. D/ z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.1 O# o0 p8 f2 v
+ s- `9 e( [1 t. V
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ r& Q! O; o  R4 k/ A2 {: s7 k; u8 iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! D( K2 I0 L$ u, I! e3 Q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' T- T9 P/ \) rpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
6 u1 r) z9 q/ m6 v6 kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 g* G% D' _3 ]( J3 y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 m. P2 a' }+ I0 z/ Vbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
  g6 w" Y5 T$ I

) `) C5 U4 m! r/ E& L' E    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' z) v  r3 }; T' F8 l0 z* Z7 B0 ?9 oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' q' w) Z, ]# p+ |: ]; J! U
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,2 H. C2 _5 M1 B/ H0 R
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; L( E) p7 H8 g( K0 ~
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
8 e" g$ F  Z8 x" _in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
# |' Y5 D- T( A: F8 Ytowards the end of 2006.
   
$ e, ]- u9 [$ w: t& U  L/ e. l3 V( i9 @# {( }: v
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of; _% c2 f. J( [8 G: g1 R
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- h" a% R  L  o  S% C5 Rto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 H% K- ]& C7 H7 S! q
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( f/ Y6 @4 U! X- V6 eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, C/ v/ W7 c/ fpressure on tight inventory levels.
) f0 e  {* x4 t% b3 h
5 i& h. x6 a: g9 z7 s: b    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic; H& _  G0 _, Z0 l
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
  x. B! B# f' `; [4 _, Uinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
$ v. j4 r5 o6 @) B! u2 \2 N8 [- uwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- F" D; _4 l1 N. ?9 [  W8 afor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
1 [* U; o2 l' U5 ?
. t2 O+ h& ^4 Y( Y8 ^, D3 F' R( f' d    <<0 S$ Y7 X/ L2 V5 ^7 k
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
: K1 ^- H: ?0 d/ L! `1 a, `5 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  F: l) r7 D" e. Q
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
  M4 M0 j$ o  I+ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ X6 n5 b0 V" x7 K( a, @) \. g                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q32 X0 T- A* O" J0 i) _) q% _
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; W  s7 R$ F3 C7 p5 E$ c( W) ]9 o# f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 O( b9 s; U: A/ ?) k2 t7 r
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0000 v+ q  b1 U& N- A1 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 L0 _* v2 j/ E3 Z; a3 P
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0001 b1 W6 P" j9 `) H: s- N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" ]2 i+ |& N" p. m3 C
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000! p6 Z) g0 R9 Y4 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 R7 E: x2 @- v7 f. F
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -6 c0 @4 b8 w  I  y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  N5 h: o) p/ s    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
0 {$ w' s& v0 v, S; F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 h& P3 i. z' E9 u2 S7 Z0 x' _' o    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5830 F( X6 F( Q: `7 ?+ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: a$ j$ G7 C. G% D$ V  `
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
5 @6 h, w$ z2 W# g- w* v' W4 ]8 P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; F: i0 e4 T/ L7 A( l; {& ^) E8 J: S    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
3 b8 q# R9 f% r% o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 o! G1 H. y; r' }' q0 i7 t' }5 c
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ j- v/ p- k% @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& {" R7 l( l7 p/ @( c    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
$ A( `$ U! k; ]2 p! e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 H; M% A3 y- C    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 L% k" ?" d! B! e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ]0 z8 S! E2 B- y: k# g6 B5 z    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
7 g$ z$ J! @. i* S( q8 o8 T0 m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% F0 G( X4 `) A0 R! l7 E
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714* h, o+ O) ^0 R/ y- H: S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 _0 s! d$ k4 f; F- U  }5 C  G    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
3 w5 z4 o5 N! N( z- g; q% E$ @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Y  Z, Y& H7 t3 _: M/ N3 h* |    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000+ m3 @% |% L: E: I* g. v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 r6 m2 E& `$ h5 N7 \    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
5 X: N' p. S& K: t; R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) F) S' f/ l9 l$ ~- P- C( R
/ l) P6 Q5 b& Q' j' U6 Z$ i% B7 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
- C5 a6 S. I; N  H, ~                               Standard Condominium
  u4 o+ t& i1 B6 Z" X' u    -------------------------------------------------------------
  `; Y6 @! |: B8 f3 w* B& s1 z5 ^$ F& A                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo! R/ m# m4 s5 @) s. Q
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
+ v$ \7 \( a4 H4 L  @    -------------------------------------------------------------* A% _$ m" I3 e# z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 _  z7 \9 E. _: n
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ {) z" x0 Y+ {: G/ t, Y
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%1 Q* b- _3 n0 w0 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------: ?# P& z9 k3 q6 C, I1 Z5 `
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
! k! e2 s7 W3 P# b  v) T    -------------------------------------------------------------: m% o1 @( O+ Z2 {& m- I; F5 ~4 s/ w
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A8 F  T8 S2 p& M  X4 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 R0 N& C( ^) o& X! W9 A
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
4 @, R( Z! g. q( E    -------------------------------------------------------------
- A( Y) F6 T/ P9 }0 m    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
' x7 q8 i5 |! i/ ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
. a1 H8 }' Q1 i8 y9 C7 p7 ~2 S    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ k3 U% m, m5 Z6 J( x; T3 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------  M- o0 ^. N- `+ {7 J2 m
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. k/ z  t% }8 |1 D( |7 W* M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 I* R- ~' T; a: P3 W0 s8 g    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%* L* D) X- ^/ c$ }( }7 [) A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ k1 X) A$ U) E4 K  i7 T% e2 @    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%/ O8 ?# v6 g3 @+ I0 d* U; c$ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]- q* a# D8 C' U8 l7 z7 e    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
5 V( W. ~3 K7 n. P5 T. [3 I    -------------------------------------------------------------7 p; B) `+ v1 [! {! y4 h+ u  Y! u
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) `+ h+ p9 M1 c+ J1 K- |2 S    -------------------------------------------------------------& I2 g+ C3 ?5 o/ P5 Y
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
% Y; A! H, o0 p9 Y- @* I& E" j    -------------------------------------------------------------
& q2 y6 c7 U4 t' c! w3 X    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
- M7 w: D0 Q. G1 }8 w    -------------------------------------------------------------/ G8 x: `. ]+ D9 L! W& Q
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%+ n. i9 S/ Y7 t* ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ b4 k$ y  X( c) W
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%; l, K+ G8 {' C% @6 S- G- ?( O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Z( W$ G! m7 r9 o9 d1 |- e    >>
0 Q8 ]& E7 f' p% I
. Z* Y% F# _. @    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) d( t1 B. n3 G, E! S, F+ i. L* }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint  Z: T4 H- E/ h$ K9 f/ @" M
John and Victoria.5 `- J& p% T% J- o% k. ~

: \- q) y, A% l4 D    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( ^# H$ b; x, [1 V
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of' t, N6 G. @0 h: u
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- Q6 @& j, b. `5 K- K% A) b* I7 y/ }9 F
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
+ K: |2 U; A! [# X$ D/ ?7 B1 a, Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& _, V% j2 j$ G- Gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is2 h& V! E) A- T9 P5 b# l" V2 F
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current/ w% q5 t' }& F" j1 S
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable! G: c% S. I) A7 A# _
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) F/ E5 X; Q+ xNovember 15, 2006.: i  ]  X, e$ J0 ~0 y
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& E7 l$ K" L4 F& U9 I
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge" C$ o6 z- K5 [+ q7 Y( d
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ M8 D$ l, \) }& p1 _
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-26 20:35 , Processed in 0.151464 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表