 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' O9 p# u/ j3 ?' T5 e' U
6 ~2 T3 X8 D8 w% q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ q c; ]5 u n3 }/ G! b% V' T) s% e" I2 }. k) q5 d* b
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
4 w" Q, z6 `( l) z% nexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" W' ?+ Y' D" H2 B1 ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, _. P C5 f+ ?) ]+ R+ U
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' A3 n- [! \# w4 l
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 H/ X2 ^8 ^$ q& l! Qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% y! ~ C7 l9 A3 z
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- ~- {4 G0 M$ B4 ]* g9 k' [9 A
LePage Real Estate Services.
1 n5 Z P, m/ g( t
" H1 l m B. T0 k. e Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 h5 j$ h" m3 S
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic# [( f/ X* R$ Q* z+ j- K
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and4 u9 c) S% \! ?$ X; G" ~8 N# i) t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) d$ n% q8 d0 V0 j7 n2 E, I6 G( v
residential real estate sector.
8 _* k2 q. h) j8 v. ]0 B: i* V7 D( d4 P+ [" d# U7 @/ K
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
7 ^9 ~! n( _+ B3 _6 ^$ h! toccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% _0 S8 y! j; S D0 f: c" W
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
; w2 r. M2 N9 e q3 [& a7 ](+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3808 d# F# O7 p& `- b
(+13.2%).
0 c+ z* ~5 s9 Z: _4 B6 R5 l9 N& X, ]+ y- h7 ]
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth6 Z3 @/ w+ ]( ]0 U" y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: e _7 y# b) A8 H# Lfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
. B" R$ k% E( jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; B2 I; f; z' y9 O G8 t
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( a- M9 Z& P4 x"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We, j# Y/ n$ b$ m; b$ |8 M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# a" t; V$ | {7 ~. D
balanced market."( _" {$ L. L) e9 o
: `! i+ P a; q Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- M, J% E; ?& |" Mconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
8 _ q6 Q% [: Q/ ?$ K/ cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( Y1 M+ X# M: r: i' f( U2 Lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, \; Y R" `; m5 Fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 a" k; z; J5 e" |3 A) h: r; Gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: j, Z. X) l; t5 z, Z- m
breaking price appreciations.- ?$ G* B$ X2 c) w6 o- X
0 O+ z$ ^ @! F# }' P, Y Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( G, `5 S$ v8 ~0 \- U8 H( w
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
/ m3 G2 ? R* U" g7 P/ ]3 V2 M$ nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 @) V% W% Y' |, F' Z7 ]- \' A# _# ~4 j- y
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid4 ]( W8 N. I+ a9 [. e6 P/ @
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 y; L3 ?. X) d5 r( a& I9 n! ^8 ~
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ g9 t* c/ S4 pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ h1 p* F" T- vIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ ]! J5 b+ [& k2 Y( q7 Z2 e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 D5 t4 d$ j9 ?/ wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.$ d& f) B8 J- b% C) F, [
# X+ T( g) ^* R While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing j) l- o* ]5 R A# u5 C
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( u; \7 d. q7 Y7 k; u7 [
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, l( K2 H9 L8 f3 S
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
! Z$ m# w5 b1 K6 d
; S2 k+ z3 T8 ]$ W/ U Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' U: m" q5 P- u7 X5 i {7 ^& j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. E' F* c0 g. `2 Tfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) O( f& X0 u9 r+ J* t& n
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general5 Y: W' T( d" y; I" H
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 i4 g# f# \2 H
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and0 G" T% F9 I7 b1 G2 S& U: m9 S
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ O% n% _9 E# g6 U* l& l" X7 z+ l8 {mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ u6 y1 |1 {% I
: R9 u/ ~% _# p& W+ r <<1 y+ _3 T$ q' a8 e* b
REGIONAL SUMMARIES6 @4 U, \% y# ]7 l* L; u
>>
m1 Z6 a7 p( b$ [
) _8 F7 @' s6 ~3 ~8 A1 L0 d' k Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ C7 G9 Q* b0 O+ UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. l( u% B& A; ~) B
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ _( x6 T, o" _$ e$ }+ r
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
* f9 N9 B% ^- t! o: Grenovations.$ A$ E5 x% a' {2 t1 b
. K7 K2 u0 w# P* `8 Q The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 ?9 J* a* E/ A% h8 Y- J0 Tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
# s% k* C' D. p, B% Icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and% ]% D* @) ~) r1 w
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.! T% F% O. y2 L0 ^7 ^
8 m' W% x' w/ ^! E% m2 M
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
# X; Y! d2 O8 m- \slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: a. k0 ?& v3 t. Q& k3 s# s" p4 equarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new% S1 B: T2 n3 Y! K' s6 x
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 [; o( o: h1 b- rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes; `7 @& @ U6 r6 B
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 o) U4 o: {9 Y3 Y% W
/ G( P* b( w$ p6 u In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ g7 \. r. a+ y& P' \
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ L. g! p [3 ~+ t2 e% Vhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers A7 Q. s, }0 K0 T L3 d I" j
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: V% D6 D+ D: L9 f
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: W6 s- V' |9 ]8 K. ?buyers with more options when looking for a home.
) ?" N0 c9 ?" O; U: Y4 F/ o% t% m
. O7 w# B$ P( ]( J: O' E0 s2 \ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! u$ T9 ], q5 m/ t2 h* ^
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! a! z: O, Z+ k6 ^( [: d+ @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( `* k9 l' W& X# T' S
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. |3 Y+ ], A/ M+ W. s+ Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions. F8 V0 B, U$ _( c
; |5 u+ b" \) r1 K2 d9 `' s; g( }
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
% V4 S s$ w1 x ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory" Z; U; E8 D$ ^$ i' U. x+ F3 K
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 L' K3 M1 j. s H# q m b- U0 I
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 C% L1 b/ z2 c$ v) b% swhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ ]% g# O) N' O2 lpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 c1 s- [, k7 N2 ]! b1 [making a purchase.
4 c+ i% G' O; B1 x& F8 ^6 j6 B/ }& ~: t" S A6 P+ K
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# {4 R8 m2 r9 L
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong3 }; s1 g/ G5 n* w# L7 N& ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ O7 i- z1 ^/ W; ?, \' K) |: q# H& ?6 fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) d5 f* w6 i# a2 zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; `- r6 Z2 b2 ?9 f0 Iamenities.! u3 k2 H1 ]/ N' k: r" `$ V; d
3 N) u$ R @7 v) b& \/ h
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 S3 v% N1 b( O4 l
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
2 J& }% w- T$ E& i, V% ?# hacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has k" R r+ ?1 z' C- G, `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
, r2 e8 Z L) |: \1 }. C* |driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 I% _; h. Y3 z) S+ }3 V* i& t/ V1 q
residence, rather than for investment.
, H9 b' v, n' y3 K- G8 x: w8 m: j7 g% R: G# t( m- @& K
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as' Q8 `2 Z; o0 y% w! h3 w
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ V5 _0 D [. X8 t6 V
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- M+ }' I8 D3 x! u4 m2 p* y
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* d( t A1 }3 @rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( M' j$ ~7 _; i0 {1 i9 N- y, a
the market.
9 E& W- d6 f2 z) p- A( u A& Q% ]/ }4 i
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ v: v* w' q$ Q, i9 Y) P
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In- p' I$ i* p3 E3 M% E
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 f/ `8 w3 X. V9 {. Y \4 o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
& ~0 ?6 w" I( f. q' f( ?to the shortage of available inventory./ N9 ~# Q- }! k
7 {, z3 h- ]( a+ u/ }! W/ j7 m2 P
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, x4 s& D7 P# ]( m6 Y) pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
[/ ^, X9 q1 B! Xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 L% ~) f9 B* U' fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; L- Z" Z' f9 l7 S T
4 k+ L, e2 b+ m' h* T Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- s8 `5 Z- G7 E% \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. f6 v- B9 \: y9 ~( n2 [2 Xunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
1 M: `$ M. n+ l0 l- dpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
+ M( g# S' T# C& o/ [1 S( Bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 Y; O" V, t3 o: v
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 _* T' N, P% p2 g% X
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 u# ^& B, q+ S$ J2 o. k/ H5 z+ u. x2 B5 }. V
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter$ y- A/ K* ^" Z+ P, Q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 a+ M- c/ @* w' c( vremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 a2 V. J. m! J) J, l" umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( l( ^8 c/ `% K! k: h& ]
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 `8 K6 K! R& _: j$ M) Q7 D: c
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly7 R3 `. i8 D7 s9 D" h5 F
towards the end of 2006. & h8 `" N) V q# f/ ?" h, ~
3 R6 l4 @' N: s( C; [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; h$ y9 T# D" Q! Qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 W; m: C9 ]5 X, v
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 E3 i1 O; ^, o+ o! Sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) B! b0 M% _/ C! ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 b- E, u$ U7 M" a: apressure on tight inventory levels.% q3 Q2 @: b: q2 f/ S- X0 S* e
5 [* M. V' Q% H, w
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, K: e' o. X' d0 Q: U& X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
v$ m. J; `$ V. U' Qinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
& t( p g1 ]& e* U7 [; r2 e/ iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 k7 f* m* }. H0 wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# o- O9 |7 H" f* e. r; e
% c& [! U0 h3 w. T4 Z& J& a <<" I* g3 ~. x5 m" c8 {, k& m" l
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 ?1 s* P/ S r
4 Q( Y2 l( T1 c' v3 ~6 @1 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 S* k% L. }; I9 E5 T8 Q
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey% n5 @# ]* b7 b( [" D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* h3 P1 X5 h0 L# x3 c' | 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
+ ?) ^! }) Z2 E5 E Market Average Average % Change Average Average
7 S3 K: N9 w* m! ]4 O# R/ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: i- X' u3 D) j# S: y. b Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000/ Y2 s" |5 f Y' B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' J( `6 u) _7 y- K# I" _/ n Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
7 b: Z7 @7 u. K* O1 Z# Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 a. }, Z% Y" p$ q+ z Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0004 g3 W. i3 ~. K4 {* g4 k- P$ h+ C/ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 p; g" n0 T! Y: ?2 l2 h8 P9 E Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -2 G. q$ d# b& a. f: ~! a5 o9 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! V8 B" ^% A. d& q9 `9 W
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
" a6 m G+ h8 ^0 Y- j$ D- T8 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ w9 z7 N7 |: r4 h5 B& L
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583& a4 ~+ z4 R+ p, Y F* Z2 h1 f! A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' j, g/ X9 d( m# i! K0 F/ B" T
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
+ {9 S8 D+ K# \* u( ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ?( b8 U) O; ?' F* `; s1 r Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250% M3 |! }, }, k1 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 K _, P- ~) A$ U) r5 } Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 p8 Z }( ?: _# K. r/ B% ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------; v3 G. `# X- L1 C; I4 x0 i
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707% ?$ w+ P9 W9 J4 E% ]) V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& i/ @7 a( j9 n" p Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500) C+ a8 \5 P. G
------------------------------------------------------------------------- k6 l: o; y7 m
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' c0 P% n# y4 h2 X5 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 e2 d8 r9 h1 f! {3 k
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
0 s3 G/ O8 `. ?4 J6 L9 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ L4 t! v: i2 X Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
; ?9 Q# o3 o7 h' s. C R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# f5 o4 t; |& o) {0 ~ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0003 T" a+ x0 \6 }7 h! D& X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% g& \$ j0 m D& ~ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
* x! O/ }7 K. N -------------------------------------------------------------------------, Y( K7 Y: ~8 {, W F9 j! K4 M
4 l1 C! T- m$ Q, p7 p
-------------------------------------------------------------+ k# i. U V: I5 d( K! g: _1 K
Standard Condominium
: m0 W1 q- d5 h, j -------------------------------------------------------------
/ n) k, T3 t% _5 Q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
1 ]# _' z( J' Q$ N' c Market % Change Average Average % Change
: P9 y- `1 F; I! @9 M r' y -------------------------------------------------------------: r7 X, \. v3 W: Y ?( |( c c
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: C4 [* ~- ^( `# T1 z
-------------------------------------------------------------+ [: ?' d4 l% ?7 W1 ^% ?; Z, c
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
) R* k# H1 p6 }3 ?' y+ S* ? -------------------------------------------------------------
5 a9 A) a, n, o+ d3 ~, @ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' Z2 J4 z* n; n f; u) W -------------------------------------------------------------
- G2 g0 B) I. T0 s" Q' ]9 F" a4 T# X Saint John N/A - - N/A
+ ?. v. k- V, L. T7 E+ g -------------------------------------------------------------! d' H* R9 e, h1 |' D
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( V0 Y) D( S4 ^! Z( r' I
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 i1 O6 q% L- {/ Y' Q9 e( r2 i Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
& }4 \% {" x9 O) d/ ` _, X4 ?# j4 j -------------------------------------------------------------9 E# U9 G0 V$ \4 j5 {
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%7 a3 W3 I4 V& e2 Q4 C- [ Q# A
-------------------------------------------------------------
% S- P7 |/ R8 B9 M Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
V! x- p9 f% F* F8 v8 [( P -------------------------------------------------------------
" v/ V' s8 {6 E2 i) c Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
( r/ o3 s! }' r2 J; B" A- O6 |/ E -------------------------------------------------------------' I& ?0 [9 W9 r$ C/ R' y
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%- P8 I9 X0 S6 b3 t( C8 u: e! w
-------------------------------------------------------------* t h5 y, Y( ~9 }: |* R
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
* y7 ^" m0 E* c( L, ?, a' U* J* H -------------------------------------------------------------$ A l2 H! o1 @. z8 I
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%1 U" R5 C( M- G( D ]# }# n6 S
-------------------------------------------------------------; S$ G3 S1 z3 I9 N# s
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
7 V, q4 y( [- s4 I -------------------------------------------------------------' D, k6 G1 S* L; Q+ z9 u: \
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
$ h& N$ {1 U) a7 @' H/ o -------------------------------------------------------------" \8 J1 r. W7 Y/ [/ i
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%# J' H" T7 }7 Z/ D
-------------------------------------------------------------
]6 S) Y2 t3 B7 F$ R: R) u7 t) I r National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%4 E' w3 d- o$ X' o% I, Q, l
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 C T3 r4 S" W1 N$ u1 Z5 O' U >>
8 F# N; \$ l- S1 j) J& b1 T7 A% l0 l
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 q, m7 P& ^* n$ c- M- w w$ V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: g6 H$ D3 v j# C" hJohn and Victoria.
* z ~- M+ M2 T2 ]
2 p' P/ V1 a( e; m; ~: M& s4 N The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 c8 [1 m+ f- g+ _# z/ N; k) n0 T
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( n, T# I M3 Y+ K" n
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. H) d: K9 n# g
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) \8 d2 p9 e- atrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& B; q. X! @' ?3 ~5 ^9 c+ z0 V4 s% ~across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 a) k- T8 R: D* h) l! Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 J0 x, [8 O; Z( L! P% a; Lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 W! G; b+ u8 z- \: [) w
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 |* Q5 y. y/ S& ]: n7 XNovember 15, 2006.( E; y C2 z5 M) \6 L
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of' }; P; L3 D, F) \) g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
# F! b3 i, X1 @2 xprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is- m. h( X' v9 F W/ Q @5 _/ `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|