埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1992|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
6 m4 }& `/ _6 C, G0 ~上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?
3 u$ S- S* i/ I" e! Q& E6 i' k9 M

' Z" c1 ]$ X, {2 [

3 _1 i9 Y' R- w" [http://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf3 q& Q# F4 V) B2 J  X
7 N, T6 w, v" A( @5 v
: z+ i( n* Q8 B; M$ Y0 x
Refund Requests
2 o3 `6 H* `6 m$ {- V6 m' O7 N74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who
! C6 T( O+ a3 f; W# upaid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part2 q8 o5 H% {! B% c- k, H% `
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if3 z/ |, Z# x8 W- H9 Z7 e
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to5 }- c% E3 S1 T$ z
Canada to the time of release;1 X' F" S, F5 a0 l
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;
' \% e& U+ E) ^& _, `(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;% W' x  T& B7 A) I
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential
3 p9 |/ u" T) `- B- n/ Rtariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the
* n' C9 I8 I7 Z9 q9 g. Y3 {case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under
) j8 H! Y" ^& M# g8 @. Z9 G+ o6 Qsubsection 32(1), (3) or (5);7 Z7 ^$ t  x; G
3
. T8 @! \: m" V$ q(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for7 ]* r# P* b5 q
preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
. e- t: s9 T8 n- n  {4 }+ t5 Y8 Zaccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
; [4 w8 d9 P) {* ]4 x( g(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;  k5 Q5 Z8 y( W
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)
# b  A6 m; l) g; r) J. H# _; Pof origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or0 r2 _. A9 x3 E* o1 Z
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision/ _5 ]6 }7 ~$ D8 T, B) b- _. k
under any of sections 59 to 61;2 q7 c0 b7 |8 g( q; R2 Y9 u( C
(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];
2 w7 e. P) c8 ]) |+ b" l(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.1 i( L( L$ h  D9 _; \8 W( e7 e1 n
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
+ ]3 J' o8 {$ }; N( i; Lon tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of$ W* e" H/ M. z. m7 G" a% G9 f
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).1 ^$ E6 J1 E$ I& c/ C4 M
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
2 t2 S9 C" ?* |5 h; [1 e" C/ b. ~unless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time.
- \9 q% d" m+ z$ w. t  M(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless% o$ Z! m$ f2 e  }! D- ]. C
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in2 _5 z  a) t9 X- |$ U
respect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
+ A6 A* u% m! U. h- r(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be
. a) D: o$ O3 Z- Q; j' J$ nprescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the( t* \4 {# Q+ D. _( R% K5 k: S
prescribed information within9 e9 o0 f* F/ ~/ p
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)5 Q  Q  Q7 f+ T
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and. @( m8 j2 d2 ?0 z
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods# K; I( u: x# K- }9 R$ \, A1 p
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.* r% [8 E( N# x- d8 [
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of
# I2 D* I+ i$ n6 Mthis Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if  p9 b% t9 G8 v. v# u
(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied* \5 q0 ?& c  m9 v. Y
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not7 p0 F" q( ?7 P6 z
eligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or! k% w# S8 s7 y3 {6 G3 y! N9 a
(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied3 E. o, R# U- D. ~: r
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is% b- ?* m- s5 X
incorrect.' d- u" \# [( e9 d( r9 z
(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),/ T5 \5 N0 ^* G  r" r( e
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground
* n/ p, O9 f) h! b  F( x3 Jother than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it
$ n# w# v: }( j1 Vwere a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.$ @7 P- i& r0 V: r
3 T# ]- g' V* t# r
这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-10-28 08:43 , Processed in 0.297214 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表