9 E Y9 \0 F+ o5 F2 i" _0 [ I
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.1 f+ g& X# U x, u0 a0 w# L
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. / f9 Q& R9 `4 M# x( [; r; g1 V1 u0 W, {; `, Y; R# R3 R- Q
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票? 9 x. K% e, m; wpchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.1 N4 I8 H0 N: b0 q+ c u3 e3 H
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 0 c4 K1 `) I# B% c3 x" T % m5 l. ^9 h$ P e0 K1 H$ `- R( _" }' L1 N6 y- i
, [! S) ?3 s0 e$ h$ s4 \
* ? |% @" U$ U$ P: \ & f- w9 e. P! S - s A) x/ o. v8 A) Z2 g小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
9 D/ y- t" r. k( x8 h8 t9 Q7 l7 n1 k! w
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, " M" p, Q( d. @& R+ a4 r m& A2 _9 v, P5 X9 g# A( N. }
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实: S8 p7 t" F& m, A! B" i
1 D. _8 X6 k4 {1 L# W
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则