 鲜花( 53)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
This is a column by Mike Holmes in today Journal. Holmes, in this article, has detailed some very good points which I failed to say it clear in my previous postings. It's worthy to have a read but for those who are too busy to do that, I would like to summarize it as follows and hope it would work as an alarm clock for those who rely on inspectors to determine a back-off or go-ahead decision on one of the biggest investment ever in their lives.
5 N3 z( G& O' x1. Currently, no national licensing and no federal regulations for inspectors-some may have joined membership of inspectors organizations, but it is believed that they use it as a marketing tool.
) e1 \4 B, I1 q1 K+ r2. Home inspection may only provide the public with a false sense of security-they don't have liability insurance; in cases they fail to notice major problems or mistakes were made, you can sue them for only the amount you paid them, i.e. the inspection fee; the expensive costs of repairs will be on your own ( since March,2009, B.C. is the 1st province to offer such protection)% x+ |: l4 D0 m. j1 H' U: Z9 d
3. Anyone can claim to be an inspector and many of them are self-taught.
: A1 V# I" x1 ~' U2 }3 }, W! X, m. J1 L. I: V! o: m6 D( t# J# I2 u
So, when your inspector reports too many of minor problems like nail pop-ups, dripping faucets while there is no other serious deficiencies such as leaking roof or foundation walls, it doesn't mean you need an instant back-off but be alert and make sure your inspector knows what he has done and no check-up for serious problems was missed. |
|