 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly+ c8 b2 v0 j, K" Y0 x- \" r4 Q
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove0 `# x$ S# c/ y1 j# B! h# a2 c
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
( [' M' u- s+ p: iprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
. x# z' |9 \+ M( v0 m: A* [% Afundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
/ Z _& D8 ?8 O2 o( loverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
: K1 s/ W- x7 i) vthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
2 V! W# g- w1 q& P) c& A+ ^12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past+ A0 K4 _' h1 z3 W: |5 `7 k+ b& v) u
three years.
( S4 }# `4 O/ h' U/ c3 m, ZBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
4 N& W x6 O: k* ~$ [their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of& V; h% G" h& P. w" n
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects; i% b8 h, P F3 \4 K8 w( t
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices" s2 @6 l2 J1 H8 ?
to fundamentally justified levels.
' h" H4 q5 r1 x. K0 R* n8 ?We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
* ^6 f) m" B- d q/ A2 bwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and& v" V- n) W# ?' b
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
. _! W% A- [0 ]0 x1 _where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although+ ~' G/ ~, F' k" [
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
9 K1 b" {7 G* ~$ `# V$ b: u# r“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where- ]; L6 k( e- j- Z ]9 E
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
: D0 H* L. u* ?that is now being rapidly reined in." m" |+ Z2 g( ^
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,( @! r* ?& i5 O& k$ G8 p; e
the construction of too many new homes over the boom% Z5 |. E9 [! S* q2 Z. M! f7 [3 k
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh3 X% U2 r+ h1 U8 R& q6 F6 A6 r1 ~2 {
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
1 K% g7 }- i+ e- G" {& dfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
+ I' d4 G# K: x( V$ Hremain choppy and new residential construction will be% J9 N6 G- X- q
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
% O3 L& E- R$ f, z8 I/ |* {is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this0 \5 ^ y: q, \5 `* ~0 K) ~
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide! _; B1 ]2 f; `0 f1 K( }7 r
residential construction will fall further to around1 G9 Y% ^) y' W. B" U7 \
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units8 h5 k0 D" W! f' l' g/ B. p% }
in the fourth quarter.; _0 A$ O* ]3 w
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
5 Q5 Y3 j# `* g6 t1 m0 Xwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
$ [3 T+ m0 K! ~6 _/ G) W( wfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
* S- f3 A- E! q% X4 iprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home9 H+ }: l, _5 e; z
values since house prices should track incomes over the0 l, b! J( M+ p; w/ x
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
' D/ j5 Z$ v Z( V3 jregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers( R/ B) D+ _* {6 C; W
of residential construction.. M7 V8 {4 N' k5 _! S& U
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a, U5 O0 o3 y* |
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction9 g, ~" L& `! U# r! f
would have occurred if housing had been priced M) h2 e9 O6 w- E3 y3 u; ?9 u2 K; T
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this2 `: P# }/ K9 p+ A4 v
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
: U; z; U3 U( j/ l {units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
: B. S7 O. B$ |3 W' Y: P k$ g2 s8 ~many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.! g' @% v; K' \
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,& |1 [- \! R8 `4 C2 Z( X7 F; l
where housing demand will further contract under waning
3 A3 A: o: R* w2 x6 S/ }population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
) q2 ^, _$ Y. F7 ]already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the$ @/ y- f* S& { K/ F
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
; d+ y! W y5 a- W3 |buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces; `( Z6 K. {* k
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural6 @! ~2 a q& m* d! H* w6 n0 d5 U
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.8 E& y7 r2 A I O) x6 e! y
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
0 }! h9 B" l+ u% K& t7 [# }strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
- h# X0 k1 \3 h) X* nMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
. X) i8 ?/ [- b+ Sgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership, I0 c4 V: V, ?- ]; s! k
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
0 }' M3 W7 @: A$ t4 dcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears+ }8 c9 l8 J9 d3 j) m! h3 @; n
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
8 P+ m9 o f' s, a* ycondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically4 _$ Z2 X% P# v" Z" h
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
9 _+ S$ b9 Q& w0 W3 b1 S9 mconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
( ^( t U# q- n0 breach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as3 x0 A8 Q( R4 U% M6 I' V" l9 W7 A
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could% q2 W3 [3 Z6 U
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while7 A/ a8 Q2 v2 O5 \
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
' R' y1 K0 f' E. Y# t( h- canticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
; Y, o6 {4 E( sinter-provincial and international migration over the coming
0 L/ Z) L K9 `# \/ D$ @years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
2 d$ B, s9 {, `! S" w: ]will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
* I0 P" x8 K2 e0 MOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING" L- D( B1 d) a+ w; m" K' o% F% e
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
# f" _& U$ H Q5 _ x4 D) fGrant Bishop, Economist) y! Q p3 h8 [9 M+ V* v; [( `
416-982-8063
( d" R" K% L$ q& _, WPascal Gauthier, Economist+ j( D+ e8 W7 O3 Q, O5 `
416-944-5730
' e2 h y( o/ [+ b e" e+ l. }
2 y) j2 A1 o( D/ s5 uhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|