 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
6 I0 E7 ?, ^5 @ Q: j# ^' Xfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
0 C2 H* o3 i5 }- |7 U( E' junsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house" T; P4 k' Z7 `8 x, Z. \
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
, C" x0 k2 y/ _: Ifundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This e5 d. ^+ t" n2 X6 [$ @6 N
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
3 n/ n5 Y/ N' W7 M- jthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately+ q# p7 C O( g' j. D9 a$ A
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past& U: e: d3 J. {. A- K
three years.$ t3 [' ]* V- M0 x" ~: o
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
$ @! N: [2 H& j! z. Btheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of1 O9 J! U6 J$ \9 K' G$ W2 N
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects% n O" \; O4 @, `4 o: _
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices) V* u+ i& Z( t
to fundamentally justified levels.
* j; }; k/ |4 |We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven” S4 z& e# u/ L& Z2 J
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and/ S* V9 d0 }0 G0 O) I
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
; @( g$ W5 V9 o2 f- S8 @8 W7 dwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although2 Q3 ?) {1 f. n$ ~( E% q, m9 j
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
" e: z" t6 s0 z' u“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where8 t; P( q: V( T6 y7 A( _
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch. z3 N- F4 D9 D# x: i' }
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 Z, u: d. ^5 K% y
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,! j8 W9 P `6 ]; w6 L
the construction of too many new homes over the boom. Y$ m2 `" C: X/ D& g: {7 Y6 C. J
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh1 Q2 P8 H4 u+ q' U
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers* ?: w: v0 f8 K1 R/ k( ~2 F
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
" p6 F+ t; @' tremain choppy and new residential construction will be2 v8 R w; k9 }
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction, |' w; L% t- y; Y, a$ b
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 e. s: Q1 Q$ S: s; e0 u+ q5 ^
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
8 s# F( m6 q! z3 Kresidential construction will fall further to around4 v9 ?' E3 g/ M. Z
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units& J5 ?% b; {, k
in the fourth quarter.
2 \% h6 Z+ p( zTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, V% _5 M* A3 c" x3 m
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
, B8 s9 S4 ]. @/ P- v mfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each( C' Q/ _; Q) k
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
+ k4 f- l8 ^1 X% j) h# U! F6 f! L* `values since house prices should track incomes over the
8 u' }; r6 a+ c" Jlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
. k* X7 A7 D _ J0 B+ }regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
: } g2 p3 O C1 u5 R8 S$ `of residential construction.% \7 {/ T4 K! [- R- v; g
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a" ^3 ]3 }3 `6 G8 T! H/ {
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction0 X5 S& N5 `4 y9 b( r6 p
would have occurred if housing had been priced( f( S# y& a2 k6 K+ e
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this% q. P* T3 ]; y! a- D
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
8 S. Y" i6 X: m& q+ G6 }, Nunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too4 g) m7 |" q" {" U4 _
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.( t' G5 a* I: D( Q% s
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,( e- R" _5 t. S, A" E
where housing demand will further contract under waning2 l" N7 v, S( O; I* I, d/ z
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are7 y, d( R7 F, |8 s
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
( H+ ^. B u1 p# @very time that the resale market has swung into strong- ^ P- }- h5 s5 y6 B; b x1 [- r
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
c# }5 i8 E. yhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural5 _/ v0 P. `0 s t6 ?" m
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
5 |" V! W/ w! H, p: {Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the9 W5 e! ~$ H3 i) H
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
& P$ g/ |& h' [$ t4 xMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,0 s- I) ?- k% o: g I
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
' S. v# z3 ~+ b Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
8 e) A0 ]* E- Lcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears% k+ O& s O4 N! z2 q E
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto, R, g4 O+ n) h8 t
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically; w6 h2 c8 ~" G7 E; Q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
3 ^' u$ r5 z1 Pconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
8 F8 h$ _+ G8 P& a% w( I# ~5 J' sreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
; c4 T; {! Y- z. j% H/ Scyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
; `8 u1 y0 R) r1 o, }& l- D) y: mspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
+ T0 W3 ~3 v$ ^" r6 c# V! ^5 uresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
5 H' N% N, j7 ]! ]: u$ Qanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from# d+ s6 T5 z1 {* s; ?5 N/ E4 N+ [1 F
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
# C9 ` t6 D- `% r9 l1 Y& hyears, which, along with improvements in affordability," Q# H: g# F, T+ D0 Z
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
7 q4 O4 t" b0 r" l" bOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING! v: ], G2 U7 I
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS7 I1 p1 ^8 F. P, ?1 i8 Q4 T
Grant Bishop, Economist
/ k3 v$ m y2 B" }; x2 G416-982-8063* j" C9 l5 N% [& m/ }. z% C& [
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
% @: d8 I1 ?! K# n/ [416-944-5730; X2 X+ `$ j" O" }" u8 g
, I8 r5 o* o! L T: C
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|