 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员" E' |! j7 `1 @* z
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
' r/ F$ X0 P# k8 m- E( {
+ g8 z: `/ I8 h& I' A9 N+ j0 AEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.) |) ], U1 c- U2 R5 [, ~, `+ D
2 S8 z( S* h! k$ vMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ; y7 S; Y, l1 e: ^" ~6 E
8 p* V- V- r$ v% o# ]
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
) W1 {; g/ o, D$ b8 K8 V. u: }! |1 p* c6 K# v: n' w8 s
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.$ C7 `: ^: M/ r% p7 s1 U
: i7 m2 x/ G% M' D: N2 i: b
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
6 h3 i/ N; C [% C5 i9 D! T: {3 N U" o2 l* F
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.9 K, R) _# ^5 ?, P3 u
+ U) Y5 b; o7 W3 w" p
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.8 e, {- ^3 s( k! W/ x' I& f
& a( F! y" a3 f& b3 h8 |7 S3 C4 v
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
* j5 l2 Q# t k# e: T6 p! L1 O; t$ N( Q2 D* S
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|