 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
0 _( k0 m }5 P$ e/ WDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs( ~2 L! @- g; @, h4 [$ x8 Q( C
( H; [+ v$ r' ~2 {( f
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
, G& `: P9 C- i4 J$ u7 ^
7 J1 s1 H2 A. S* B4 c0 ^9 o MMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. / R* _& ~9 F" w. f# i: U
& W9 E( A5 Z: d y/ v+ N L
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.9 `* z- w* Q9 l/ K: r
: g! L5 E9 J) rDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer., r' l; s, l$ O% i( y" ^1 V
# M+ X1 V- @8 \7 c- S2 M3 A% _
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
4 y8 O1 ~$ y _9 z C, |% ?& ?3 w# w1 ]; A/ d1 Y
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.- z4 m% j" Q9 E1 s1 R6 {
; X$ [; L, i& Y
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.' E) @) ]! T' `
6 H9 d$ Y0 t1 M; w4 _6 w- I1 w5 fPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
& `* ]( O1 [9 f' v; o9 l U4 o9 _# U7 [# I. H- t! l
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|